User talk:Onorem

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

But if you have any further problems at Talk:Tinga Tinga Tales, please feel invited to ask me to help. BusterD (talk) 22:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello! I am not sure whether you've considered it before, but I figured it may be worthwhile to suggest making your user page a simple redirect to your talk page, as I've seen other users do. Cheers! Remsense 诉 17:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for the suggestion, but I prefer the redlink. It goes back a decade or so to when some users were trying to force people to have a userpage. It might be a bit childish, but I'm OK with that. :) --Onorem (talk) 17:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

this,[1] I suspected the edit might be legitimate, but as it was posted by a banned user, I reverted it. So your reverting my revert seems to be valid. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

I don't need to bother looking for "reliable" sources at all because I know from experience your crime syndicate does not follow its own rules. You will delete anything that does not facilitate your crimes.

You have now outed yourself as an operate for the KM. If you do not want to get the death penalty I recommend that you STOP YOUR DISRUPTIVE EDIDING NOW.

Or not. The only way to see to it that your dying crime syndicate never can threaten the world again is to eliminate the lot of you from the gene pool. 173.206.200.14 (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Wow. --Onorem (talk) 16:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Sorry to reply to you so late. Actually, I checked the current reference^[1] and found that the article misquoted its contents. Also, the external links below can prove that the publication information in the text is incorrect. So no more citations need to be added, but text to be fixed, in my opinion. Please let me know what you think. CyanWisp (talk) 04:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi! I am writing to you because your message in my Talk page. The user Svartner has came back (he did the same thing in March [2]) and he is reverting all the articles related to the count of matches between Argentina–Brazil football rivalry, for example Brazil national football team records and statistics and Argentina national football team records and statistics. He was who entered in an edit war, because he doesn ́t discuss anything: he first reverts, removing information with sources, and then, enters in an edit war, reverting and reverting. In the Talk Page of the article Argentina–Brazil football rivalry, I put a lot of sources (a few of FIFA, the most important football association in the world), but he insists in his attitude and he is reverting those articles [3]. He doesn ́t respect 2 official FIFA ́s sources and many others that even put Argentina above by one match (AFA, El Gráfico, TyC Sports, Promiedos), and he only puts 3 sources that say that Brazil is avobe. Only one source gave by him can be considered "serious" (rsssf.com), but the others (eloratings.net and 11v11.com) are a complete "joke". I think that any source can ́t be above a single FIFA source... A single FIFA source "kills" any other source, because FIFA is the major world football association... So, the user does not "recognize" 2 FIFA ́s sources, one of them with the complete list of matches according to FIFA, and others from AFA (with the complete list of matches), El Gráfico (with the complete list of matches), Promiedos (with the complete list of matches too), TyC Sports. Please, read them:

1) FIFA source number 1. Updated to the latest game (BRA 0 ARG 1, 21/11/2023):[4]. Tied in 42 each.

2) FIFA source number 2. Updated to the 21/11/2012 game. After that match, they played 11 matches, with 4 wins each, 2 ties and one suspended because of the circus made by the brazilian "Ministry of Health" or "Security"... The source shows all the lists of matches... To see the complete list of matches, please click in "Advanced search", and then in "Show all matches":[5]. Adding those games, Argentina is above by one match...

3) Argentine Football Association source number 1 (the major Argentina ́s football organization). Updated to the 15/11/2019 game. After that, they played 4 games, with 2 Argentina ́s wins, one tie and one suspended match because of the "circus". The source shows all the lists of matches... [6]. Adding those games, Argentina is above by one match.

4) AFA source number 2. Updated to the 16/11/2021 game. After that, they played only 1 match, won by Argentina. The source shows all the lists of matches... [7] Adding this game, Argentina is above by one match.

5) El Gráfico Magazine source (the major football Latin American magazine between 1919 to the middle 2000 ́s). Updated to the 16/11/2021 game. After that, they played 1 match, won by Argentina... The source shows all the lists of matches... [8]

6) Promiedos.com source. Updated to the latest game (BRA 0 ARG 1, 21/11/2023): [9]

7) TyC Sports source. Updated to the latest game (BRA 0 ARG 1, 21/11/2023). The source shows all the lists of matches... [10]. Argentina is above by one match.

To be "good" I think we should consider the FIFA ́s sources. Beacause if we are "evil", we should even say that Argentina leads by one match, as many sources say...

I think it ́s crazy and inconceivable, and the behavior of this user is capricious and unacceptable. Can you help me to stop this nonsense? I have alredy made a post in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents [11]. Thanks! Regards, --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

You are both edit warring. Look at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. I have no interest in this topic. --Onorem (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

@Onorem It is difficult to reach an agreement as every time he reverses and removes referenced content claiming to be a "joke". Anyway, I think it's even better for other users to give their opinion, the article in question frequently undergoes disruptive edits. Svartner (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

My talk page is not a stage of dispute resolution. Stop edit warring, and figure out what step you need to move on to next. (Here's a hint. Reverting again isn't the next step.) --Onorem (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

I am steven toushin (the last time i did an edit was maybe over 10 years ago, soas of today this is very new to me) and just did a small edit to the personal info section, if i made a mistake please tell me what is was (no need to threaten, also i gave money every year)

steve toushin Stoushin (talk) 20:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi,I'm Wiki30te.And heck yeah you made a mistake@Onorem and I don't need you snooping got it @wiki30te no thanks!!! Wiki30te (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

That's great. Go bother someone else...preferably on some other website. I'll continue 'snooping' as long as you continue adding worthless edits. --Onorem (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hey man, as you can see from the tags I’m on mobile, and you deleted some pretty useful information about how the song was written. So if it’s ok, could you please add in the reference for me? I have the link here that you can watch through the whole documentary and see how the song was made.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/895beb53-96b8-40c0-89af-e1c77836b361 MusicalEditor05 (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

I'm not interested in watching to find the comment...and disagree that it's useful information even if the studio engineer said it. --Onorem (talk) 14:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for your kind response, could you please define your definition of ‘useful information’? MusicalEditor05 (talk) 14:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi there once again, I have now added in what you have requested on the ‘Feelin On Yo Booty’ wiki page. If you want to have a read over it again and change anything then feel free. I’m a relatively new user, so bare with me while I get to grips on the rules of wikipedia. MusicalEditor05 (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Why was my page deleted? It is a real upcoming movie! WikepediaEdits12 (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

There's nothing worth writing about it yet. There isn't a reason to have an article. --Onorem (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

hold up you also deleted my propose for deletion on Malcolm preserve! are you watching me??? (I am new to Wikipedia so I don't know anything about mods) WikepediaEdits12 (talk) 18:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Yes, I looked at your other recent edits. I also reverted the mistake you made on the TikTok article in case you care. I'm not a mod...just a user who noticed a new user making questionable edits. --Onorem (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

This complaint will serve to confirm that User Never 17 has continued editing responses from contributors who vehemently oppose his point of views, thus creating a hostile and unhealthy environment in the article known as the "Best Selling Artists Listing Directory" and its "Talk Pages". Also including but not limited to, the Elvis Presley "Talk Page". To reiterate, this has created furious and angry feedbacks from more than one contributor who have repeatedly question why have their rebuttals been deleted, edited or relocated/transferred to the page "WP: Not A Forum" by User Never 17. This practice has been systematic and ongoing by this user, to no avail. I am hopeful that you can address this matter to avoid further hostilities from common contributors who have differences of opinions from said User and have been severely edited without their consent by the aforementioned User "Never 17". He has been reprimanded for this type of behavior and yet continues this offending practice. I will await your formal response in correlation to this matter. For further inquiries or concerns, please do not hesitate to reach me. Thank you, very truly yours. Victor0327 (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I have no idea why you chose to post this to my talk page. That said, it looks like your comments on Talk:Elvis Presley were very correctly moved into the NOTAFORUM section by an administrator. --Onorem (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I though you were an administrator who handled such complaints. Obviously you are not. I am new at Wikipedia and do not know how go about addressing complaints of this nature. However you did address a similar problem and complaint with the same user. Moreover if you read my comments you would know that they should not have been moved into a Forum by any administrator, for they were not problematic in any shape or form. That being stated, thank you for your response. Victor0327 (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]