User talk:Idacticus
June 2026
[edit ]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elohim have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Elohim was changed by Idacticus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883622 on 2026年06月05日T15:55:37+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
My edit has been undone by a bot. The change could be verified by reference to any concordance, and I don't know if I should reference one or which one to reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idacticus (talk • contribs)
- Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. Please report the edit as an error as instructed in the post above. 331dot (talk) 16:49, 5 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
CS1 error on Tanning (leather)
[edit ]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tanning (leather), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:50, 9 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
I tweaked your fix. Provision of the DOI (which is, or anyway ought to be, permanently valid) makes provision of an URL superfluous. Deletion of the URL makes provision of an access-date superfluous (indeed, its provision throws up an error). ¶ I hope that this makes sense. -- Hoary (talk)WWU 👍︎ 22:30, 9 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]