User talk:Epicazowski

Hello, Epicazowski, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Mathglot and I've volunteered to be your Wikipedia mentor. I'm here for you whenever you need help with Wikipedia. It's great to have you on board to help create this online encyclopedia.

See your homepage for a brief tutorial. Here are a few links you might find helpful:

Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or the Task Center.

Help is available: as your Mentor, you can always find me listed in the "Get editing help" module bottom right on your homepage; there are also additional help links there. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or try the Wikipedia:Teahouse to get help designed especially for new users from a team of experienced volunteers. So go ahead and ask questions — we're here to help!

Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! Mathglot (talk) 21:25, 23 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you so much, Mathglot! I felt I should join and help improve this place because I understand this website will never be finished, at least until the end of the world. Once again, thanks. ❤️ (P.S. Gotta find the missing pieces of the Wikipedia puzzle globe. Could you help me? LOL) Epicazowski (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

If we can extend it into the far future, Maybe you'll have time to find those missing pieces. But get going, there's not a minute to lose, if you really wanna find 'em. Mathglot (talk) 06:15, 25 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Ok. Did I leave them with the others? LOL. [end sentence] Epicazowski (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Information icon Hi Epicazowski! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Apple Inc.. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Apple Inc., please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 20:27, 5 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Alright. I am very sorry. I did not know that was wrong. Thank you for telling me. Epicazowski (talk) 20:37, 5 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Earth. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. You seem to be reverting back to the stable version, but this is still edit warring. I have already warned the previous editor, so please stop, as you have already breached 3RR. Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:36, 9 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I am SO SORRY. Maybe Wikipedia... wasn't the right place for me 😔 Epicazowski (talk) 11:55, 9 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Apple Inc.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. There's a solid black background behind it in dark mode. It's not ideal and looks worse. The switcher doesn't have a solid black background. GSK (talk • edits) 16:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Ok, sorry. I've only been here for a month so I don't have much experience. Epicazowski (talk) 17:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I noticed your message on the Teahouse and your other messages and just wanted to say: don't let a few little mistakes deter you from Wikipedia. I made lots of mistakes as a new editor–and so has every other user–and continue to make mistakes even as an experienced editor. You seem to have strong communication skills, which is valuable on Wikipedia. If you feel you should continue editing here (and I believe you should, though it's entirely your decision), I'd advise you to keep going! You've apologized, and you can move on now–you're already a better editor.

Sorry if I'm overstepping at all. Have a great day! 🏳️‍🌈JohnLaurens333 (Ping me!) 17:32, 9 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks <:) Everything is resolved now. Epicazowski (talk) 17:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Glad to hear it. See you around the 'pedia! 🏳️‍🌈JohnLaurens333 (Ping me!) 17:54, 9 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

You too 🧩 ⚪️ Epicazowski (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Please read WP:DENY and refrain from feeding the trolls. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 21:32, 10 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Ok. - Epicazowski (talk) 22:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Sorry for scaring you with the deletion request, I was going to leave a note here but I got distracted. You can read more about our image use policy here and our rules for non-free content (like the image you found.) Basically Wikipedia focuses on free content so non free content like the ad would have to have a pretty good justification about why it's essential to be included. Don't worry about making mistakes, you're going to mess up plenty here because there's a lot of rules built up over the years. Have a great day. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 00:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks. You too. - Epicazowski (talk) 01:04, 14 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:04, 18 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Ok. - Epicazowski (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Epicazowski. I wanted to let you know that I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaxbys early. WP:Articles for deletion is not the place to propose a page move. Requested moves is, though, so I've started a requested move at Talk:Zaxby's#Requested_move_13_May_2026 on your behalf. In the future, use that process if you want to change the title of a page (or be bold and move it yourself if you think it'll be uncontroversial). Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:35, 13 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Information icon Hello, I'm ApexParagon. I noticed that you recently removed content from Short-term memory loss without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ApexParagon (talk) 21:43, 16 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

stopPlease stop changing the target of redirects that are currently tagged for active discussion at WP:RFD. Removing the {{rfd }} tag or changing the redirect target in the middle of an active discussion is disruptive and unilaterally (削除) inactive (削除ここまで) enacting your preferred outcome in the middle of a consensus-building discussion is against Wikipedia policy and practice. I note that you removed the RFD tag again after @ApexParagon left you the above warning. If you continue this disruptive editing despite repeated warnings you are at risk of being blocked. —Myceteae ‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:02, 16 May 2026 (UTC) Edited. 23:55, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply ]

Ok. Epicazowski (talk) 23:02, 16 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Myceteae. I was trying to get the redirect to work properly because it didn't actually redirect. Epicazowski (talk) 00:00, 17 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Gotcha. When a redirect is tagged for discussion at WP:RFD, its functionality is temporary disabled precisely because there is an active discussion about what to do with the redirect. Among other things, this allows editors who click on the redirect in the middle of a discussion to join in. Feel free to share you opinion about what we should do with Short-term memory loss at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 6#Memory loss. If you are new to RFD (Redirects for discussion), you may want to read Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion § The guiding principles of RfD and Wikipedia:Redirect before participating. —Myceteae ‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:21, 17 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

If you have questions about RfD, let me know. —Myceteae ‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:24, 17 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Ok. — Epicazowski (talk) 00:24, 17 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]