Talk:Xylopsora canopeorum
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.svg){kind=link}
The good article status of this article is being reassessed to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page .
Date: 02:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Good articles Xylopsora canopeorum has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review : April 5, 2024. (Reviewed version ).
Review : April 5, 2024. (Reviewed version ).
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
GA Reassessment
[edit ]- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
- Result pending
Per this discussion, this article was found to have been, at least in part, LLM-generated. Wikipedia cannot in good conscience reward LLM-generated articles with GA status. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Retain Since no actual issues with the article were noted in the above nomination, seems like a procedural retain close is appropriate. Silver seren C 02:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Procedurally delist per nom. This sends entirely the wrong message. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 16:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]