Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:World Wildlife Fund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World Wildlife Fund article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives : 1 Auto-archiving period: 12 months
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Environment Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Switzerland Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 11, 2007 and September 11, 2008.
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions

Page is wrong

[edit ]

Page is wrong 103.105.176.204 (talk) 13:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Yes true 103.105.176.204 (talk) 13:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Yeah 103.105.176.204 (talk) 13:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

? 188.118.10.169 (talk) 08:14, 13 June 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Move discussion in progress

[edit ]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:WWF which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:02, 3 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Source verification: Assisi meeting 1986

[edit ]

The section describing the Assisi meeting in 1986 goes beyond the cited source, especially in terms of the involvment of Prince Philip, the name of the declarations, and the interpretation of their spiritual significance. While what is written is historically accurate, the citation is technically insufficient. I have published research that covers this event (see Lund, A.J., "Greening the Church Year: A History of the Season of Creation." Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology 79, no. 2 (2025): 144–61, doi:10.1080/0039338X.2025.2587112, pp. 147-148), but as the author, I would prefer if another editor reviews this, the sources I refer to, or suggest other independent sources to ensure editorial neutrality. TheAkselJ (talk) 08:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Requested move 2 May 2026

[edit ]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Agent 007 (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]


World Wide Fund for NatureWorld Wildlife Fund – In English, thanks to the name of the organization remaining World Wildlife Fund in the U.S. and Canada, this is far more common. It is also historically more common since it was its original name and the "World Wide Fund for Nature" name was quickly abandoned for just the abbreviation (look at the global website, https://wwf.panda.org/, where the full name cannot be found anywhere vs. the North America website, https://www.worldwildlife.org/, which still says "World Wildlife Fund"). ~2026-26794-42 (talk) 16:03, 2 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Support per Myceteae🍄‍🟫. Mainly on the basis of WP:COMMONNAME. Significantly more common than the official name, which honestly I wasn't even aware of. I saw the first part of the move and thought to myself that I don't know what that is, and then had a moment of confusion when I saw the proposed title. I reckon many readers have a similar experience. ⹃Maltazarian parley {\displaystyle \lor } {\displaystyle \lor }investigate 22:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Yeah, I, too was unaware of the long name and had the same momentary puzzlement upon seeing this. —Myceteae 🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:19, 3 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Support per above. Feeglgeef (talk) 22:29, 2 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Support per WP:COMMONNAME and Myceteae's excellent breakdown of current media coverage. DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 03:10, 3 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Support clearly the name everyone knows the organization by. The Adventures of the Not So Venerable Mr. Siggs (talk) 20:36, 5 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /