Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:WDAF-TV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Baseball Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Television : Stations Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television , a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject icon Missouri Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Missouri , a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri . If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Kansas City Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri , and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Userbox

[edit ]
WDAF This user is a viewer of
FOX 4 News Kansas City
in the Kansas City market.

If you watch WDAF for your news source, here is the userbox you can display on your user page if you'd like. The code is {{User WDAF-TV }}. Corkythehornetfan (talk) 01:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC) [reply ]

Disputed Image

[edit ]

This doesn't seem to look loke the complete logo of 1993 as it is missing the Newschannel box around it had back then.

Might Get 4 kids tv?

[edit ]

As You Know, Fox Is Planning To Sell WDAF Along With Eight Other Owned and Operated Stations. And Because Of This, WDAF Might Pick Up 4 Kids TV. 12.216.123.8 16:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Unsourced

[edit ]

Nearly this entire article is unsourced, and it has a lot of historical information about the station. I added a {{refimprove}} to mark it as such. Xadnder (talk) 07:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

[edit ]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in the article. Not including this type of material in articles abides by current consensus and is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

  1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
  2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
  3. WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
  4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 04:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

[edit ]

There are two different logos for WDAF-TV and I want other thoughts. WDAF-TV currently uses the word "NEWS" at the bottom of their logo. They use it on their website, Facebook page and their Twitter page, as well. The question is Do we use the logo with "WDAF-TV" at the bottom or "NEWS". I am thinking that we should use the logo with "NEWS", since they use it for everything. Thoughts? Corkythehornetfan (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC) [reply ]

Agreed - we should be going by whatever logo they currently identify with. ~Super Hamster Talk Contribs 22:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
I go with on-air branding as far as how the logo should be, not solely their web and media presence. Unless this station is identifying as 'Fox 4 News' through the entire broadcast day, we should retain the call version in the infobox; the news version can stay in the newscast section or be replaced with a still of the open. Nate • (chatter) 23:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
I would go for the one with the callsign on the bottom, because it thoroughly identify the station as a whole. Yes, even though the station probably use it "Fox 4 News" logo almost everywhere, it doesn't really identify the station as a whole. Like Mrschimpf said, it would be a different situation if the station's overall branding (non-news prorgamming, etc.) were "Fox 4 News" (i.e. WMBF uses WMBF News for the overall brand). So I agree, the logo with the callsign should be posted on the infobox.Csworldwide1 (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
[edit ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on WDAF-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

[edit ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on WDAF-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /