Talk:Quingnam language/GA1
GA review
[edit source ]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Kepler-1229b (talk · contribs) 19:33, 26 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Reviewer: Erinius (talk · contribs) 01:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Hi, I'm planning on reviewing this for the June backlog drive. Erinius (talk) 01:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
I haven't yet done a full, thorough read-through but The Quingnam language became extinct shortly after the arrival of the conquistadors. Miguel Feyjoo [wikidata] reported that in 1763, the language had already become extinct in favor of Spanish
stood out to me. 1763 isn't shortly after the Spanish conquest, and Feyjoo just establishes that the language had gone extinct sometime before then. Erinius (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- I'll reword the text soon. Just a heaads up; I'm going to be very very busy until the 20th, so I probably won't respond within a reasonable timeframe. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 14:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- That should be fine, thanks for letting me know. Erinius (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- By the way, I'm adding some new info to the article in the vocabulary section. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 15:15, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Cool, I'll read through later. Erinius (talk) 15:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Ok, stable now? Erinius (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yes. I'm not planning on adding anything new. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Done reading over things and taking notes. I really liked this article! I'll have more to say in a bit/when I get organized and look over the GA criteria more closely. For now, the "Spanish vocabulary" subsection near the end seems overly-detailed, a lot of it is relevant to the source being described but not to the Quingnam language. It was cool to learn milpa is used there, but that doesn't really say anything about Quingnam. Erinius (talk) 01:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- What should I do then? 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- I think a lot of that subsection should be cut down or removed, it doesn't need to mention all the non-Quingnam indigenous words in that area's Spanish. Erinius (talk) 01:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- done, see article 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:13, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- I think a lot of that subsection should be cut down or removed, it doesn't need to mention all the non-Quingnam indigenous words in that area's Spanish. Erinius (talk) 01:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- What should I do then? 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Done reading over things and taking notes. I really liked this article! I'll have more to say in a bit/when I get organized and look over the GA criteria more closely. For now, the "Spanish vocabulary" subsection near the end seems overly-detailed, a lot of it is relevant to the source being described but not to the Quingnam language. It was cool to learn milpa is used there, but that doesn't really say anything about Quingnam. Erinius (talk) 01:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yes. I'm not planning on adding anything new. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- By the way, I'm adding some new info to the article in the vocabulary section. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 15:15, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- That should be fine, thanks for letting me know. Erinius (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]