Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Quingnam language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Languages Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Peru Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is supported by WikiProject Peru . This project provides a central approach to Peru -related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Peru To-do:

Quingnam language is currently a Language and literature good article nominee. Nominated by 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 at 19:33, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review this article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor. When complete, this review will be closed by the reviewer. To view the review and add comments, click discuss review .


Untitled

[edit ]

This article was split from Chimú culture, with some of the more egregious errors deleted. — kwami (talk) 20:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

GA review

[edit ]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Quingnam language/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kepler-1229b (talk · contribs) 19:33, 26 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Reviewer: Erinius (talk · contribs) 01:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi, I'm planning on reviewing this for the June backlog drive. Erinius (talk) 01:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I haven't yet done a full, thorough read-through but The Quingnam language became extinct shortly after the arrival of the conquistadors. Miguel Feyjoo [wikidata] reported that in 1763, the language had already become extinct in favor of Spanish stood out to me. 1763 isn't shortly after the Spanish conquest, and Feyjoo just establishes that the language had gone extinct sometime before then. Erinius (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I'll reword the text soon. Just a heaads up; I'm going to be very very busy until the 20th, so I probably won't respond within a reasonable timeframe. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 14:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
That should be fine, thanks for letting me know. Erinius (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
By the way, I'm adding some new info to the article in the vocabulary section. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 15:15, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Cool, I'll read through later. Erinius (talk) 15:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Ok, stable now? Erinius (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Yes. I'm not planning on adding anything new. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Done reading over things and taking notes. I really liked this article! I'll have more to say in a bit/when I get organized and look over the GA criteria more closely. For now, the "Spanish vocabulary" subsection near the end seems overly-detailed, a lot of it is relevant to the source being described but not to the Quingnam language. It was cool to learn milpa is used there, but that doesn't really say anything about Quingnam. Erinius (talk) 01:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
What should I do then? 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
I think a lot of that subsection should be cut down or removed, it doesn't need to mention all the non-Quingnam indigenous words in that area's Spanish. Erinius (talk) 01:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
done, see article 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:13, 2 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /