Talk:Overclass
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Added three source - is it OK now? --GwydionM 17:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
Restored
[edit ]A great deal of well-sourced material was removed, restored it. --GwydionM (talk) 08:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- If it was well-sourced, why was almost all of it tagged {{cn }}? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
Kindly READ before removing. A couple of items were unsourced: they could go. --GwydionM (talk) 09:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- All I could find was the (probably excessive) quote. Nothing else was sourced, although one section was attributed to a person, not sourced, and should have been removed as a BLP violation, as it was added before the person's death. It's no longer a BLP violation, but there is no reason it should remain without evidence. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
I am strongly considering a major overhaul of this page in terms of content amount and quantity of resources. Vnguyen518 (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC) [reply ]