Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.

3 December 2025

• diff hist m Logarithm 13:43 +45 B.Jayden talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by ~2025-38126-31 (talk)) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diff hist Logarithm 13:42 −45 ~2025-38126-31 talk contribs (.) Tags: Reverted possible vandalism Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diff hist International System of Quantities 13:27 −15 NebY talk contribs (→Base quantities: trying to deal with some awkward grammar)

2 December 2025

• diff hist International System of Quantities 20:23 0 Quondum talk contribs (spaced dashes should be en dashes)
• diff hist International System of Quantities 20:22 0 Quondum talk contribs (typo)
• diff hist International System of Quantities 20:20 −447 Quondum talk contribs (ref update)
• diff hist Addition 20:14 +319 David Eppstein talk contribs (→Abelian group: textbook source)
• diff hist Addition 19:27 +186 David Eppstein talk contribs (some authorlinks)
• diff hist International System of Quantities 18:54 +95 Quondum talk contribs (+url, publisher)
• diff hist International System of Quantities 18:42 +192 Quondum talk contribs (→Base quantities: updating some refs)
• diff hist International System of Quantities 17:15 −108 Quondum talk contribs (→Logarithmic quantities: after a bit of review, let's remove this claim about dimension of logarithmic quantities: both SI 9th Brochure and ISO 80000-1:2022 (unlike earlier versions) have had any reference to the dimension of a level (and of the associated units such as Np, dB) removed entirely, as though to avoid taking any stance on this, so WP should not be making such a statement)
• diff hist International System of Quantities 16:54 −36 Quondum talk contribs (→Logarithmic quantities: rm claim of levels as being treated as derived quantities (this is hardly useful); a citation for the quantity dimension being 1 would still be useful but I don't see that questioning the validity of this more limited claim will help here)