Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

International Fujita scale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from IF0+)
Tornado rating system
"IF2-" redirects here; not to be confused with IF2.

The International Fujita scale (abbreviated as IF-Scale) is a scale that rates the intensity of tornadoes and other wind events based on the severity of the damage they cause.[1] It is used by the European Severe Storms Laboratory (ESSL) and various other organizations including Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) and State Meteorological Agency (AEMET). The scale is intended to be analogous to the Fujita and Enhanced Fujita scales, while being more applicable internationally by accounting for factors such as differences in building codes.

In 2018, the first draft version of the IF-scale, version 0.10 was published. This version was based on a 12-step rating scale. Over the next few years, dozens of tornadoes would be rated on this version of the scale. Most notably, the 2021 South Moravia tornado received a rating (IF4) and full damage survey on the IF-scale conducted by ESSL, the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute and four other organizations.[2] On May 6, 2023, version 0.99.9d was published, which changed it to a 9-step rating scale.[3] In late July 2023, the first official version of the IF scale was published.[4]

2018 version

[edit ]
Tornado rating classifications[5]
IF0− IF0 IF0+ IF1− IF1 IF1+ IF2− IF2 IF2+ IF3 IF4 IF5
Weak Strong Violent
Significant
Intense

Parameters

[edit ]

The 12 categories for the International Fujita scale are listed below, in order of increasing intensity. Although the wind speeds and photographic damage examples are updated, which are more or less still accurate. However, for the actual IF-scale in practice, damage indicators (the type of structure which has been damaged) are predominantly used in determining the tornado intensity. The IF-scale steps are defined by a central value and an error. The errors have been estimated to be 30% of the central value, resulting in overlapping speed ranges. The distances between the central values of the steps have been so chosen that the upper bound exceeds the central value of the next step, ensuring a balance between the resolution of the scale and the expected errors. Since ESSL required that the steps be consistent with the original Fujita scale, they introduced steps with − and + suffixes indicating steps one third higher or lower than the central value of the original scale, e.g. IF2− equals "IF2 − 1⁄3IF2" and IF2+ equals "IF2 + 1⁄3IF2". Above F2, such a subdivision was not introduced and only full steps are used.

Scale Wind speed
(Estimated)
mph km/h m/s
58EBF8</span>"}]]}'>IF0− 45 ± 14 72 ± 22 20 ± 6
4DFFFF</span>"}]]}'>IF0 56 ± 17 90 ± 27 25 ± 7
89FFF3</span>"}]]}'>IF0+ 67 ± 20 108 ± 32 30 ± 9
C4FFE6</span>"}]]}'>IF1− 70 ± 24 128 ± 38 36 ± 11
FFFFD9</span>"}]]}'>IF1 92 ± 28 149 ± 45 41 ± 12
FFF2BF</span>"}]]}'>IF1+ 106 ± 32 170 ± 51 47 ± 14
FFE5A5</span>"}]]}'>IF2− 120 ± 36 193 ± 58 54 ± 16
FFD98C</span>"}]]}'>IF2 135 ± 40 217 ± 65 60 ± 18
FFC57B</span>"}]]}'>IF2+ 150 ± 45 241 ± 72 67 ± 20
FF9E59</span>"}]]}'>IF3 182 ± 55 293 ± 88 81 ± 24
FF738A</span>"}]]}'>IF4 234 ± 70 376 ± 113 105 ± 31
A188FC</span>"}]]}'>IF5 290 ± 87 466 ± 140 130 ± 39

2023 version

[edit ]

On May 6, 2023, version 0.99.9d was published, which changed it to a 9-step rating scale.[3] In this version, the wind speed damage indicator was introduced, which made it the first tornado intensity and damage scale to use measured wind speeds and Doppler weather radar measured wind speeds.[3] When the first official publication of the IF scale, the 9-step rating scale was kept. It was noted that each scale's wind speed is to be taken with a 20% error margin on each side of the central value.[4] This was done to ensure the lower or upper bound of the overlapping rating came close to the central value of the other rating.[4]

Tornado rating classifications[5]
IF0 IF0.5 IF1 IF1.5 IF2 IF2.5 IF3 IF4 IF5
Weak Strong Violent
Significant
Intense
Scale Wind speed
(Estimated)
(Central value; Full range of the 20% error margin)
mph km/h m/s
4DFFFF</span>"}]]}'>IF0 55; 44–66 90; 72–108 25; 20–30
89FFF3</span>"}]]}'>IF0.5 75; 60–90 120; 96–144 33; 27–40
FFFFD9</span>"}]]}'>IF1 90; 72–108 150; 120–180 40; 32–48
FFF2BF</span>"}]]}'>IF1.5 110; 88–132 180; 144–216 50; 40–60
FFD98C</span>"}]]}'>IF2 135; 108–162 220; 176–264 60; 48–72
FFC57B</span>"}]]}'>IF2.5 160; 128–192 250; 200–300 70; 56–84
FF9E59</span>"}]]}'>IF3 180; 144–216 290; 232–348 80; 64–96
FF738A</span>"}]]}'>IF4 230; 184–276 380; 304–456 105; 84–126
A188FC</span>"}]]}'>IF5 290; 232–348 470; 376–564 130; 104–156

Damage indicators, subclasses, and degrees of damage

[edit ]

The IF scale currently has 23 damage indicators (DI), each with a varying number of subclasses and degrees of damage (DoD).[4] [3]

DI Abbr.Damage indicator (DI)SubclassesDegrees of damage
BSBuilding - structure A, AB, B, C, D, E, F 0, 1A, 1B, 2
BRBuilding - roof A, AB, B, C, D, E, F 0, 1, 2
BNBuilding - non-structural elements SW, SS, TW, TS, HW, HS 0, 1, 2, 3
BMBuilding - anchoring SM, SI, DB 1
VHRoad Vehicles C, E, L, T 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
TRTrees W, A, S 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
TSTree stands WA, S 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
WTWind turbines A, S 0, 1, 2, 3
GHGreenhouses W, A, S 0, 1, 2, 3
TCTrain cars S, F 0, 1
MHMobile homes / Static caravans 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
PTPoles and towers W, S, T 0, 1, 2
SPSolar Panels 0, 1
FCFences W, S 0, 1
FWFree-standing walls Z, A, AB, B, C, D, E, F 1, 2
SNSigns and billboards T, M 0, 1, 2
SWConnected scaffolding 1
CPCarports / garages 1
SSService Station Canopies 0, 1, 2, 3
SCShipping Containers A, B, C, D, E, F 1, 2, 3
CRCranes G, t 1, 2
OFOutdoor Furniture L, H 0, 1, 2
WMWind Speed Measurement See section below See section below

DI: Wind Speed Measurement

[edit ]

A unique feature of the International Fujita scale compared to the Fujita or Enhanced Fujita scale is a new damage indicator based on measured wind speeds. For the IF scale, only wind speeds measured at or below 10 metres (11 yd) can be used to determine a rating. Doppler weather radar measurements are also able to be used to determine a rating if they are measured within damaging distance. For radar measurements, any readings below 60 metres (66 yd) can be used to determine a rating.[4] [3]

Three second measurement

[edit ]

For three-second wind speed measurements, it is assumed to be an average of 88.8% of the three-second measurement.[4] [3]

Degree of Damage (DoD) / Measured IF# Speed Three Second Measurement
mph km/h m/s
4DFFFF</span>"}]]}'>DoD 0 / IF0 42.556 6991 1925
89FFF3</span>"}]]}'>DoD 0.5 / IF0.5 5774.5 92120 2632
FFFFD9</span>"}]]}'>DoD 1 / IF1 73.990 119146 3340
FFF2BF</span>"}]]}'>DoD 1.5 / IF1.5 91109 147176 4049
FFD98C</span>"}]]}'>DoD 2 / IF2 110129 177208 5057
FFC57B</span>"}]]}'>DoD 2.5 / IF2.5 129156.5 209242 5870
FF9E59</span>"}]]}'>DoD 3 / IF3 151183.9 243296 6882
FF738A</span>"}]]}'>DoD 4 / IF4 184231 297373 83103
A188FC</span>"}]]}'>DoD 5 / IF5 ≥232 ≥374 ≥104

Two second measurement

[edit ]

For two-second wind speed measurements, it is assumed to be an average of 90.9% of the two-second measurement.[4] [3]

Degree of Damage (DoD) / Measured IF# Speed Two Second Measurement
mph km/h m/s
4DFFFF</span>"}]]}'>DoD 0 / IF0 43.458 7094 2026
89FFF3</span>"}]]}'>DoD 0.5 / IF0.5 5974 95120 2733
FFFFD9</span>"}]]}'>DoD 1 / IF1 7593 121150 3440
FFF2BF</span>"}]]}'>DoD 1.5 / IF1.5 93111.8 150180 4250
FFD98C</span>"}]]}'>DoD 2 / IF2 111.8132 180213 5159
FFC57B</span>"}]]}'>DoD 2.5 / IF2.5 133154 214248 6068
FF9E59</span>"}]]}'>DoD 3 / IF3 154188 249303 6984
FF738A</span>"}]]}'>DoD 4 / IF4 188237 304382 85106
A188FC</span>"}]]}'>DoD 5 / IF5 ≥238 ≥383 ≥107

One second measurement

[edit ]

For one-second wind speed measurements, it is assumed to be an average of 92.5% of the one-second measurement.[4] [3]

Degree of Damage (DoD) / Measured IF# Speed One Second Measurement
mph km/h m/s
4DFFFF</span>"}]]}'>DoD 0 / IF0 44.158 7195 2026
89FFF3</span>"}]]}'>DoD 0.5 / IF0.5 5976 96123 2734
FFFFD9</span>"}]]}'>DoD 1 / IF1 7794 124152 3542
FFF2BF</span>"}]]}'>DoD 1.5 / IF1.5 95113 153183 4351
FFD98C</span>"}]]}'>DoD 2 / IF2 114134 184220 5260
FFC57B</span>"}]]}'>DoD 2.5 / IF2.5 135156 218252 6170
FF9E59</span>"}]]}'>DoD 3 / IF3 157191 253308 7185
FF738A</span>"}]]}'>DoD 4 / IF4 192241 309388 86107
A188FC</span>"}]]}'>DoD 5 / IF5 ≥241.5 ≥389 ≥108

Zero second measurement

[edit ]

For zero-second wind speed measurements, it is assumed to be an instantaneous wind speed measurement.[4] [3] This can only be used if it was 10Hz or higher sample rate.[4] [3] [6]

Degree of Damage (DoD) / Measured IF# Speed Zero Second Measurement
mph km/h m/s
4DFFFF</span>"}]]}'>DoD 0 / IF0 47.864 77103 2228
89FFF3</span>"}]]}'>DoD 0.5 / IF0.5 6482 104132 2936
FFFFD9</span>"}]]}'>DoD 1 / IF1 82101.9 133164 3745
FFF2BF</span>"}]]}'>DoD 1.5 / IF1.5 102123 165198 4655
FFD98C</span>"}]]}'>DoD 2 / IF2 124145 199234 5665
FFC57B</span>"}]]}'>DoD 2.5 / IF2.5 146169 235273 6675
FF9E59</span>"}]]}'>DoD 3 / IF3 170207 274333 7692
FF738A</span>"}]]}'>DoD 4 / IF4 208260 334420 93116
A188FC</span>"}]]}'>DoD 5 / IF5 ≥261 ≥421 ≥117

See also

[edit ]

References

[edit ]
  1. "The International Fujita (IF) Scale Tornado and Wind Damage Assessment Guide" (PDF). ESSL.org. European Severe Storms Laboratory . Retrieved 26 June 2022.
  2. Tomás Púcik; David Rúva; Miroslav Singer; Miloslav Stanëk; Pieter Groenemeijer (23 June 2022). "Damage Survey of the Violent Tornado in Southeast Czechia on 24 June 2021" (PDF). European Severe Storms Laboratory. pp. 1–31. Retrieved 16 May 2023.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "The International Fujita (IF) Scale" (PDF). European Severe Storms Laboratory. Retrieved 8 May 2023.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pieter Groenemeijer (ESSL); Lothar Bock (DWD); Juan de Dios Soriano (AEMet); Maciej Dutkiewicz (Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology); Delia Gutiérrez-Rubio (AEMet); Alois M. Holzer (ESSL); Martin Hubrig; Rainer Kaltenberger; Thilo Kühne (ESSL); Mortimer Müller (Universität für Bodenkultur); Bas van der Ploeg; Tomáš Púčik (ESSL); Thomas Schreiner (ESSL); Miroslav Šinger (SHMI); Gabriel Strommer (ESSL); Andi Xhelaj (University of Genova) (30 July 2023). "The International Fujita (IF) Scale" (PDF). European Severe Storms Laboratory. Retrieved 30 July 2023.
  5. 1 2 "Severe Thunderstorm Climatology". Archived from the original on 2012年10月04日. Retrieved 2022年07月17日.
  6. A. C. M. Beljaars (1 December 1987). "The Influence of Sampling and Filtering on Measured Wind Gusts". Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 4 (4): 613–626. Bibcode:1987JAtOT...4..613B. doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1987)004<0613:TIOSAF>2.0.CO;2 . ISSN 1520-0426.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /