Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haru-Sari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn. Aaron 18:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
(削除) Non-notable, should be moved to Comixpedia, 800ish google hits, no alexa ranking, not found in this list, started in 2005, there are thousands of webcomics out there, They'll need their own CSD guidelines soon. O bli (Talk) 21:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ]
- Can you please clarify the reason for the deletion request? Burning phoneix 21:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- Done O bli (Talk) 21:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- But there are several comics with those qualifactions already on wikipedia such as The adventures of Gumbo,The Coffee Achievers,Concerned,Courting Disaster,Everybody Loves Eric Raymond, Fabricari and Genevieve's Shades of Grey. Why should Haru-Sari be specifaclly deleted?Burning phoneix 22:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- Because I found it, I suppose =\. Webcomics are websites, and it fails WP:WEB. O bli (Talk) 23:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- But shouldn't we just leave the up until the website fails? I mean, Haru-Sari is one of the more proffesional works out there. The artist is actually an artist by profession (she pencils and inks a published manga) and is planning to release a published edition of the comic soon. Surely that's enought to keep it on? Burning phoneix 00:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- Fine, have it then, I guess I'd have to be consistent all through the endless swamp of webcomic articles if this one got through, and I don't have the time for that :)
- But shouldn't we just leave the up until the website fails? I mean, Haru-Sari is one of the more proffesional works out there. The artist is actually an artist by profession (she pencils and inks a published manga) and is planning to release a published edition of the comic soon. Surely that's enought to keep it on? Burning phoneix 00:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- Because I found it, I suppose =\. Webcomics are websites, and it fails WP:WEB. O bli (Talk) 23:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- But there are several comics with those qualifactions already on wikipedia such as The adventures of Gumbo,The Coffee Achievers,Concerned,Courting Disaster,Everybody Loves Eric Raymond, Fabricari and Genevieve's Shades of Grey. Why should Haru-Sari be specifaclly deleted?Burning phoneix 22:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- Done O bli (Talk) 21:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
Withdrawn O bli (Talk) 00:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.