Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gidron Pope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Gidron Pope (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats )

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Article's subject fails WP:NCRIC and therefore the WP:GNG. Longstanding consensus at WP:CRIC that under-19 international cricketers are not inherently notable. GreenCricket ^TALK 10:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 13:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

• Delete per nom. May be re-created if/when he begins playing profesionally/at a senior level (per WP:CRIN). IgnorantArmies (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete U-19 cricketer fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.