User talk:Tin2012

Information icon Hello, I'm Kuru. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions to Draft:NichLmao, you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:58, 2 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Zing MP3, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Zing_MP3&preloadparams%5b%5d=1356852731"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:24, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hello, I'm Rusty Cat. I noticed that you recently removed content from ToRung without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ rusty ^meow ~ 14:44, 2 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia.

I happened to come across your edits, and noticed a couple things I wanted to bring up. I just wanted to let you know and clear up confusion.

First of all, I noticed how you mentioned on your user page that you're using Google Translate. At least on the English Wikipedia, it is preferred that a human reviewer double-checks the machine translation, since it can occasionally make mistakes. Regardless of whether you translate from or to English, however, you need to make sure that the article meets the standards of the target wiki; each wiki has different standards, so this makes many articles on other Wikipedia language editions not suitable for inclusion on the English Wikipedia.

In addition, if you're fluent in a language other than English, and prefer to use it to communicate with editors, I would recommend you to edit at the Wikipedia edition in that language instead.

My second point is regarding ChatGPT. I noticed in some edits, such as this one, you're including links that contain a URL parameter ?utm_source=chatgpt.com. While generative AI can be helpful assistance tool, its output should still be checked by a human, as AI is prone to hallucinating sources, or suggesting pages that don't support the text that cites them.

Lastly, I want to talk about minor edits. I noticed you're making lots of small edits to the same page in a short period of time, such as on Jess No Limit, and doing so without an edit summary. This can make it harder for other editors to review your edits by adding more revisions to the page history; for instance, accidents like this one may be easier to catch. I would recommend you to make all your edits without publishing the changes, then hit "Publish Changes" when you're done, and be sure to provide a helpful edit summary, such as "updating follower count". This will aid collaboration with other editors, by ensuring they know what your change does.

If there's a misunderstanding, or you have further questions, feel free to let me know.

Thanks, ~ rusty ^meow ~ 23:55, 2 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

By the way: You can also mark edits as minor, to signal to other editors there are no significant changes. ~ rusty ^meow ~ 15:11, 4 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Ok, I agree this message! Tin2012 (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ria Ricis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A unsupported parameter error. References show this error when you use a parameter name that does not exist. Please replace the parameter with one that the template supports, or remove it if no such parameter exists. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:

• • Sumarni (27 Oktober 2022). "Akun YouTube Ria Ricis Kembali Usai Diretas, Sosok Lelaki Bule Muncul di Foto Profil". suara.com (in Indonesian). Retrieved 25 Juni 2024.{{cite news}}: Check date values in: |access-date= and |date= (help); Unknown parameter |reporter= ignored (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Ria_Ricis&preloadparams%5b%5d=1366778022"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:25, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Reply