User talk:Djnjwd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello. You seem to have been here a while without anyone saying hello to you. So I will. Deb 19:33 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)

Hi again. We seem to be interested in a few of the same subjects. There's still lots of scope for work on the Civil War period, so go for it! Deb 20:39 Apr 19, 2003 (UTC)

---

Hi! The headings should be in nested form:

fsdfsdfdsfdf

dsfdsdsfsdfsd

dfdsfsfasdfsaf

Otherwise, the new TOC will be messed up (when it appears after three headlines are made). See Wikipedia:Manual of style. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask at the Wikipedia:Village pump. --Jiang 20:25, 1 Aug 2003 (UTC)

You can sign your name with ~~~~ (w/ date) or ~~~ (w/o date). --Jiang

---

Thanks for contributing the article about the Battle of Mons Graupius. It's been on my todo list for months, but other things kept getting in the way. Its omission has been a glaring hole. -- llywrch 03:32, 4 Sep 2003 (UTC)

---

Óscar Arias: No harm done! Peace, as the Nobel committee would say. –Hajor 14:59, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Have you been working on anything lately? If not I wouldn't mind some help with this list: Noted_translators - suggestions and additions welcome! -- Simonides 03:35, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page . It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Good catch on the vandalism. Thanks. Stirling Newberry 21:18, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your upcoming wikifying or wikification of my Swinburne rewrite. During that time, you have my authority to cut out someone else's half-sentence or so that says some critics believe Swinburne's lines were rhyme-forced. No professional critic ever said that about Swinburne, any more than they ever said it about Gilbert: both men were masters of rhyming and everybody knew it.

The vaguer offense of writing for the sake of MELODY instead of GOOD SENSE -- yes, that was a charge that Swinburne often encountered, and when he parodied himself in THE HEPTALOGIA OR THE SEVEN AGAINST SENSE, he good-naturedly produced some deliberately senseless stuff. In fact, however, he is a very intellectual poet, with a highly complex sentence structure and a lot of difficult, if not always profound, ideas. His melodic skills hide this intellectual difficulty, and let lazy readers (even including relative sharpies like Max Beerbohm) skip over the hard-to-figure-out content of what he writes.

The above paragraph is more controversial than I wanted to get in my rewrite of the Swinburne article itself, but no critic of Swinburne, or indeed of Victorian poets in general, misses their intellectual complexity. This was the age of the great logical puzzle-makers like Dudeney and Lewis Carroll, after all.

Perfect rhyming was really impossible much before the Victorian era. It requires a settled pronunciation with very few accepted dialectical variations, and this was the case IN EXCELSIS in Swinburne's and Gilbert's era. Though exact and clever rhyme lives on in writers like Stephen Sondheim, modern rap songs use near rhyme just as they use non-standard English, and even in Swinburne's time Whitman was showing that Americans (who after all couldn't pronounce English in the "proper" British manner) could give up rhyme and meter altogether and stick to free verse -- a stance which has since conquered the English-speaking world.

Swinburne and Gilbert are thus the absolute peak of clever, exact rhyming before competing dialects made that kind of effort problematic. Swinburne, Gilbert and Lewis Carroll are at the same time all masters of what I might call "empty logic," reasoning closely from one's premises, no matter how absurd those premises may be. Not one of the three has gotten any real scholarly attention. I wouldn't be surprised if the much-neglected Swinburne were actually the best represented in academic publications.

Thanks very much for your Wikification. I have some general questions. Who are you and how do you react so fast to wikifying needs? And what do you mean by NPOV, as when you said someone might object to my edits as not being NPOV enough? Could such a person be diverted or tempted into a discussion? Is this a talk site or what? I'm still a little confused.

I am having trouble with a simonP. I edit Arete (virtue) and he immediately reverts the edits. Him and his friends have deleted [Classical definition of republic] and after the many facts and the quoting of material they will not acknowledge they won't even let an external link and the talk is ongoing at Talk:Republic. This man doesn't know what he is doing. I ask that someone step in and stop this please. This man has no expertise in the classical field. He is an anonymous user. Please see also Talk:Arete (virtue).WHEELER 17:37, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

What do you mean by "OTT"? -- llywrch 18:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No, I don't think that you are "over the top" about this editor's changes. I'd have reverted them myself upon first glance, but because you gave me a clue that she/he's on a campaign to push a rather odd POV, I asked that person to supply references for this opinion. Because it is at the least a case of original research (know any published writings that claim every inhabitant of the Roman Empire spoke Greek -- er Koine -- as a first or second language?), I think that as long as no one loses their temper over this, it can be handled. -- llywrch 22:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've noticed that he has reverted Roman Empire to the same version at 01:10, 11 Jun 2005, 17:57, 11 Jun 2005, & 18:33, 11 Jun 2005. If he does it a 4th time before 01:10 12 June 2005 (i.e., within 24 hours), leave a note at WP:AN/3RR, & someone will ban him. Having said that, since I've been involved in this matter -- as have you -- it is best if an admin outside of the dispute does the deed. He seems to be headed for the ArbCom in a hurry. :-/ llywrch 21:29, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nevermind, he crossed the line already. I have reported him. -- llywrch 22:36, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi, why would you want to have two See also sections at Scandal (novel)? What's wrong about Read on? All the best, <KF> 21:07, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply! <KF> 21:16, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

Hi Djnjwd, according to the Talk:Roman Empire a long time ago you were interested in the reorganization of Roman Empire. If you still are, please visit Roman Empire/reorganization and feel free to contribute and discuss!--Hippalus 09:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chichestercathedraltoday.jpg . I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self }} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 14:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Djnjwd, at Perugia we have some inconveniences about the references. I'm sure of the quality of the article and I quite agree with his reliability, however I did a little research on the history of the voice and I noticed that most part of the history section comes from your former addition to Perusia. So if you could add some references to your contribution it will be worthy of further consideration. Otherwise if you have lack of time and cannot help there isn't any problem, and as all you have added is absolutely true I'll demonstrate it in the same way of the rest of the article. Faithfully yours, --Grifomaniacs 17:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

I'm contacting you out of courtesy as you have contributed to the page and may wish to supply your own citations. If you feel this doesn't matter to you, please ignore it. This page was rated as a Good Article, but has been downgraded because nobody did the donkeywork of listing the attributions to the various statements provided, which is after all a fairly serious dereliction of duty in what's suppoed to be a historical record. Having discussed the withdrawal of GA with LuciferMorgan, I give notice that I am sitting down with the three classic original source texts (Puylaurens, Vaux-de-Cernay and de Tudèle - the last in the Livre de Poche edition as the Martin-Chabot is long out of print) to add the missing inline citations to this page. I do not intend at this point to make any textual alterations, but if comments are made which are NOT justified, be prepared to state your sources now. Jel 21:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Felipe; I know that the image has changed, but my question is: is it the right image? It's derived from a glass portrait of Galla, Honoria and Valentinian. It's obvious which one's Valentinian, but of the two women do we know for sure who is Galla and who is Honoria? The Wikimedia Commons link takes you to a page where the other woman is captioned as Galla (as do several other language wikis). Now the woman with the pearls looks older to me, but on the other hand she is depicted alongside Valentinian. Is it a known fact which one is which? Djnjwd 20:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Galla was Honoria's mother. Did you read the articles? FilipeS 20:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

I am not sure which is which, but someone else has corrected the caption to indicate that the woman in the middle is Galla and the one one the right is Honoria, and that makes more sense than the original caption. Of course, the original caption could have been wrong in some other way. For example, if the people depicted are not actually Galla, Honoria and Valentinian III... FilipeS 20:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

But the previous version of these articles said the woman on the right was Galla!... FilipeS 20:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

To be honest, I think I've seen the portrait currently at Justa Grata Honoria described as that of Galla Placidia in books, too. However, it makes absolutely no sense that she would look younger than her own daughter... FilipeS 20:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

See this comment: Talk:Valentinian_III#Portrait! FilipeS 12:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end.[reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi. I saw you added a book of de Blois to the references of that article. Are you sure it was really used in the article? If not, it should be added to a "further reading" section. Wishing you a Happy New Year!--Dipa1965 (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

The Roman empirical command of Ninius called this fort "Caer Daun". Later the commands of Antoninus and Notitia called this fort Danum,

I assume that the Notitia refers to the Notitia Dignitatum. but what does the rest of this mean? Djnjwd 23:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC) [reply ]

"Caer Daun" means "Fort Daun" in Welsh. Cear is the Welsh for fort, but daun baffels me still.--86.29.142.86 (talk) 09:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, William Stanley (Elizabethan), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from www.enotes.com/topic/William_Stanley_(Elizabethan). As a copyright violation, William Stanley (Elizabethan) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. William Stanley (Elizabethan) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:William Stanley (Elizabethan) and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:William Stanley (Elizabethan) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL , and note that you have done so on Talk:William Stanley (Elizabethan).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 1:13pm • 03:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Fraticelli, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraticelli until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 20:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:49, 8 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi,

Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.

We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.

We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.

If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:42, 9 April 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High , while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
Readership: Medium	Quality: Low	Sakura (mansa)	Readership: High	Quality: Medium	Christianity in the 10th century
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Victory parade	Readership: High	Quality: Medium	Theocracy
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Chasing Sheep is Best Left to Shepherds	Readership: High	Quality: Medium	Christianity in the 12th century
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Great Kei River	Merge
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Bunnik	Readership: High	Quality: Low	Song of Kumarbi
Readership: High	Quality: High	United Kingdom	Readership: High	Quality: Medium	University of Constantinople
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Language of angels	Readership: High	Quality: Low	Mannus
Readership: Medium	Quality: Low	Hormizd (Constantinople)	Add sources
Readership: Medium	Quality: Low	Fabia Eudokia	Readership: High	Quality: Low	Ampsivarii
Readership: Low	Quality: Low	Adamantius (praefectus urbi)	Readership: High	Quality: High	State church of the Roman Empire
Readership: Medium	Quality: Low	Agricola (vir inlustris)	Readership: High	Quality: Low	John Purvey
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Blood River	Wikify
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Herbert IV, Count of Vermandois	Readership: Low	Quality: Low	Reunite International Child Abduction Centre
Readership: High	Quality: Low	French Flemish	Readership: High	Quality: Low	Edinburgh Handedness Inventory
Readership: Medium	Quality: Low	Arago's rotations	Readership: Medium	Quality: Low	Hydroelectricity in Romania
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Narberth, Pembrokeshire	Expand
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Pyxis	Readership: High	Quality: High	History of the Orthodox Church
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Christoph Cellarius	Readership: High	Quality: Medium	History of Eastern Orthodox Churches in the 20th century
Readership: High	Quality: Low	Agbor Comments on Structuration theory appreciated! [edit ] Hello! My name is MJ. I'm a new editor on Wikipedia. I have recently completed some large-scale edits to the structuration theory page. I saw that you've been active in providing significant content in the past, and I wanted to invite you to return and add your comments and suggestions about the page concerning its readability, clarity, usefulness, and/or comprehensiveness-- or anything you'd like to add! As I said, I'm a new editor on Wikipedia. The structuration theory page has been rated "Highly important" to the Sociology WikiProject, and I'm concerned with making sure that the page is both accurate and informative for readers who want to know more about this important sociological theory. More than anything, I've been inspired by the discussions that I've seen on Wikipedia and I'd like to inspire a similar discussion about the changes that have been made, improvements, or support on the talk page. I would love to see a resurgence in community interaction around structuration theory. Any suggestions you have are gladly received! I hope to see you on the talk page soon!Mjscheer (talk) 10:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC) [reply ]		Readership: High	Quality: High	Baptism

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Your upload of File:Chichestercathedraltoday.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC) [reply ]

The file File:Chertesy location map.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 17:11, 7 March 2018 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Djnjwd&oldid=1218893296"

Categories:

• Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
• Wikipedians who opt out of template messages