User talk:Avibliz
Welcome, Avibliz!
Hello, Avibliz, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm CMacMillan, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few helpful links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Fun stuff...
{{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Speedy deletion nomination of User:Avibliz/sandbox/chiportal
[edit ]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Avibliz/sandbox/chiportal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator . Kostas20142 (talk) 19:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC) [reply ]
- This is only a scrapt under my user page. i intend to lave only facts. It impossible to do somehting if you don't let me work on it in my own space.
Avibliz (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC) [reply ]
Using multiple accounts
[edit ]Information icon Hello, Avibliz, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Avi Blizovsky1 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 12:53, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Hello.
- Thank you for the notice.
- avibliz1 is not active for 20 years. Probably I opened it because in the beginning there was a need to open separate account on each language edition. It's an aboundand account that even I forgot about it. Avibliz (talk) 13:01, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- That's not quite what I'm seeing here (User:Avi Blizovsky1 was created a few days ago, and User:Avibliz had been editing very occasionally since 2007, most recently in February 2025) but I just wanted to make sure that you were aware of Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts. You're free to choose one account and to stop using the other. Belbury (talk) 17:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- deleted avibliz1 Avibliz (talk) 18:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- That's not quite what I'm seeing here (User:Avi Blizovsky1 was created a few days ago, and User:Avibliz had been editing very occasionally since 2007, most recently in February 2025) but I just wanted to make sure that you were aware of Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts. You're free to choose one account and to stop using the other. Belbury (talk) 17:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Linking to your own blog
[edit ]Information icon Hello, Avibliz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page 101955 Bennu, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI }} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 12:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- My blog is a legitimate source for over 20 years in Hebrew, they even have a pattern. It is a science news site that quote only peer review papers Avibliz (talk) Avibliz (talk) 13:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- If you are professionally connected to the site, you should not add links to it, that's all. The editor-in-chief of Nature would be breaking Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy if she added Nature links to articles. Belbury (talk) 17:23, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- As I said there is not yet awarenetss to the site to hvav natively links. If so please help me to introduce the site to Wikipedia users, so they will understand what the site has to offer and in what quality and then they will decide. BTW I deleted avibliz1 account Avibliz (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Where you think that your website would be a useful source for an article, adding information which does not already exist in it, you can post a message to that article's talk page, being sure to clearly state that it is your own website. That's all I can suggest. Belbury (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- you try to make hard instead of helping. What wrong with voluntarly training? of users? then i will not have to apologize on my existence to one user at a time?
- you just help by that to sciemce denayers Avibliz (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Where you think that your website would be a useful source for an article, adding information which does not already exist in it, you can post a message to that article's talk page, being sure to clearly state that it is your own website. That's all I can suggest. Belbury (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- As I said there is not yet awarenetss to the site to hvav natively links. If so please help me to introduce the site to Wikipedia users, so they will understand what the site has to offer and in what quality and then they will decide. BTW I deleted avibliz1 account Avibliz (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- If you are professionally connected to the site, you should not add links to it, that's all. The editor-in-chief of Nature would be breaking Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy if she added Nature links to articles. Belbury (talk) 17:23, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
March 2025
[edit ]Hello, I have patched up various errors in your recent addition to Science policy of the United States (please use your sandbox and/or Preview in future, to avoid errors before submitting). Can you elaborate on "It is the final cut?" Your meaning is not super clear. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]