User:Valereee
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scam Watch
Warning: There is an on-going scam targeting people who would like Wikipedia to have an article about them. See this scam warning for detailed information. If you've been scammed please send details to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org to help others who could be future victims of this scam.
About me
This user pledges to adhere to
Old-Fashioned Wikipedian Values.
Old-Fashioned Wikipedian Values.
Icon This user has been on Wikipedia for 18 years, 11 months and 2 days.
This editor is a Looshpah Laureate of the Encyclopedia and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix, Errata Sheet, and Author's Signature.
Action | Count |
---|---|
Edits | 82867 |
Edits+Deleted | 85170 |
Pages deleted | 109 |
Revisions deleted | 39 |
Pages restored | 5 |
Pages protected | 180 |
Pages unprotected | 8 |
Protections modified | 31 |
Users blocked | 380 |
Users reblocked | 39 |
Users unblocked | 37 |
User rights modified | 12 |
Users created | 1 |
I love Wikipedia and have been editing for years; for nearly a decade, I edited without logging in unless making a particular edit required me to do so. I'm particularly interested in food issues, including local artisanal foods, food writers, and food history, and in biographies and works of women and people of color, but on a regular basis some other topic sets off an edit binge.
I have an alt account User:TrainerValereee which I created so I could demonstrate editing without all the extra buttons.
Tools
[edit ]- Google books wikipedia citation tool: http://reftag.appspot.com/
- {{subst:Uw-ewsoft|Article|Additional text}} produces Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Article. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page. If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Additional text
- Going to need this and not be able to find it: quotes and spacing
- Citing contents of media template: {{Cite AV media}}
- {{linktext|WORD}} for a link to wiktionary
- search spam blacklists [1]
- Columns: {{div col|colwidth=30em}}{{div col end}}
- paywallreader.com
- Template:Contentious topics/table
- https://search.creativecommons.org/
- https://citer.toolforge.org/
Tips
[edit ]- Undisclosed paid editing study: [2]
- Reliable Indian sources from User:Cesdeva (copied from an AfD post for Bibhusita Das) In case you are still interested: the two big news RS in India are 'The Times of India' (TOI) (except for entertainment coverage, which is for-pay spam per WBG) and The Hindu. After that you have the New Indian Express, The Economic Times, The Telegraph and the Hindustan Times. There are some decent regionals such as the Deccan Chronicle etc. I'd put Firstpost and The Business Standard on the list too, but some may not agree.
- User:Usedtobecool/PSN guide to sources on Nepal
- ANI advice: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Barkeep49&oldid=988670136
- Closing at AE: Special:Permalink/1026882611#closing at AE
- If you go to the contributions page for an IPv6 and and type /64 onto the end of it, and then hit enter, it’ll bring up all contributions for a range. TonyBallioni 7:35 pm, 8 October 2019, Tuesday (1 year, 10 months, 2 days ago) (UTC−4) at User talk:TonyBallioni/Just block the /64
- Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Placed by the Wikipedia community
- Arb enforcement sanction notice from admin
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Principles
- OED
- To move a draft over a redirect:
- Use Special:MergeHistory to history merge the redirect into the draft
- Move the draft to the old redirect
- interwiki links: prepend a colon and the abbreviation for the applicable project (as defined in meta:Interwiki map), so for example you can link c:Commons:Download tools like
[[:c:Commons:Download tools]]
- PSHAW hanging up: if you get a PSHAW error (hopefully you're on chrome), hit "inspect", go to "console", and copy/paste whatever error message you're gettin' there.
- Edit notices Wikipedia:Editnotice#Creating editnotices
Expertise
[edit ]- Indian news organizations: WP:NEWSORGINDIA
- Nepali sources: Usedtobecool
- Nigerian sources: Celestina007 User:Celestina007#List_of_Nigerian_Reliable_and_Unreliable_Sources
- UPE: GeneralNotability
- Singaporean sources and foods: Justanothersgwikieditor
- Transgender/nonbinary: Tamzin per Special:Diff/1031095452
- Italian foods: JackkBrown
- Transliteration searches: Cunard, especially Chinese
COI
[edit ]I have a minor COI with three articles I have edited:
This user has publicly declared that she has a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles: