Talk:Paul Claudel

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paul Claudel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject icon France Mid‐importance

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject France , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject icon Poetry High‐importance

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject icon Theatre High‐importance

WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Theatre , a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject icon Symbolism and Art Nouveau

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Symbolism and Art Nouveau , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Symbolism and Art Nouveau on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Symbolism and Art NouveauWikipedia:WikiProject Symbolism and Art NouveauTemplate:WikiProject Symbolism and Art NouveauSymbolism and Art Nouveau

WikiProject icon Biography : Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Taskforce icon This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group .

Taskforce icon This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Fascism

[edit ]

It is true Paul Claudel was no fascist. And it is also true that his position on the Right, as an exponent of Catholic Reaction, facilitated the erection of Vichy as a collaborationist regime and ensured that Petain would become as covered in slime as Pierre Laval, who enthusiastically promoted pro-Nazi collaboration in France. Claudel and others of the Catholic Right became useful to the French fascist movement as one-way screens that opposed and rejected everything progressive because it was tainted with "modernity" but hesitated or entertained even if only momentarily the fascist alternative when it decked itself out as a promise to turn the modern world back.

Ummmm.... What? Claudel was most certainly a fascist. The paragraph above contradicts itself: "Paul Claudel was no fascist." and then "his position on the Right, as an exponent of Catholic Reaction"

Excuse me, but the definition of fascism is the political arm of the Catholic right wing. --Hexag1 (talk) 02:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

No, that's not the only or even the prevalent definition. There are arguably two meanings of "fascism", or two distinct types of militant right wing that the word "fascism" can refer to. Fascism of generation 1 (Mussolini, Hitler) does not embrace existing obnoxious cults, it creates its own obnoxious cult; it does not embrace pure conservatism/traditionalism, but rather mixes it oddly with a pseudo-scientific/modernizationist flavour imitating Marxist socialism. In contrast, fascism of generation 2 (Franco, Pinochet) doesn't have much of a theory of its own; it does embrace Catholicism and does end up as little more than the armed force of conservative reaction. The radical left refers to both as "fascism" and likes to emphasize the similarities between the two, but the modern liberal mainstream prefers to emphasize the differences between the two and to reserve the word "fascism" for the first type (if not for Mussolini only). That is because the first type is more similar to Marxism and thus allows the generalization that fascism and socialism are the same genocidal thing, while conservatism is good. --91.148.159.4 (talk) 19:30, 15 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Camille

[edit ]

'An exhibition of her bronzes in the Swiss Foundation Gianadda from 16 November 1990 until February 1991 shows clearly what can be considered only a small proof of the timeless beauty of her sculptures, inspired by a genuine talent.'

This is clumsily expressed, and non-encyclopaedic in tone. Can someone edit it? Best regards. Notreallydavid (talk) 01:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Claudel&oldid=1271226240"