Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Kalpana Chawla

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 hours ago by Simongraham in topic GA review

Kalpana Chawla is currently a Physics and astronomy good article nominee. Nominated by Salmon of Knowledge (talk) at 19:49, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

An editor has reviewed this article and has placed it on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. To view the review and add comments, click discuss review .

Note: Co-nominated with Spookyaki.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by adopt an astronaut .
WikiProject icon India : Haryana Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India , which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page .IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Green project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 2 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Syssrq2016.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Reply

Beliefs

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 years ago 4 comments4 people in discussion

I'm curious about the part of User:216.119.134.146 edit where the part reading

"The administrator for the temple in Houston where Chawla attended when her schedule permitted said "She was a nice lady ... and very pious."

was replaced with

"Kalpana had no interest in religion and did not attend or participate in any such activities - especially after arriving in the United States."

These versions seem rather contradictary. Sources? Wondering, -- Infrogmation 17:44, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)of curse yes


It is easy to find, on the web, quotations from her husband, Jean-Pierre Harrison, that appear in newspaper articles after the 2003 groundbreaking ceremony for a university residence hall (at the University of Texas, Arlington) to be named after Kalpana Chawla. There was in his view, contrary to an agreement he felt he had made, a religious portion of this ceremony. He states that he was not pleased by the ceremony -- because Kalpana "was not a religious person, not a Buddhist or a Hindu'". I would expect him to be an authority on the religious views of his late wife. This would contradict her religious characterization in the article. So I must ask: What is the source for the claim in the article that she attended Hindu religious services in Houston?Daqu 21:32, 25 December 2006 (UTC) Reply
One Source: A Muse for Indian Women; Los Angeles Times; Feb 2, 2003:
"Chawla was a member of the Sri Meenakshi Temple Society near Houston, attending when her schedule permitted, temple officials said. The temple will hold a traditional service today to pray for the peace of her soul and those of the other astronauts killed, said P. Ramalingam, administrator for the temple. "She was a nice lady ... and very pious," Ramalingam said."
(Just offering ref; not commenting on inclusion in article.) -- ToE 11:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC) Reply

Kalpana had absolutely interest in and was at best antagonistic towards religion. As far as I know Kalpana never attended any religious temple in Houston; the only explanation I can come up with for the above-mentioned quote from the temple administrator is that this person/organization attempted to used Kalpana's name to promote their own agenda. Kalpana would on occasion leave any event in which any religious ceremony would occur.

Jean-Pierre Harrison


she was Sikh . her non-indian husband may not wanna to except that. Whether he like it or not, it's not gonna take away from her heritage.

Here heritage was Sikh , I'm sure her husband doesn't deny it), but she evidently was not religious and you should accept that. Plch (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Reply

Her ethnic origins did not ensure that she remained religious in this regard - her husband's statements would trump your personal views. 104.169.17.29 (talk) 02:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Reply

Citizenship

[edit ]

The phrase "became a naturalized United States citizen" has twice been removed by anon editor/s. Is the phrase false or inaccurate? Is there a reason it should not be in the article? Please explain. -- Infrogmation 16:15, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Is it for relevance? --Rj 20:37, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

Categories

[edit ]
Latest comment: 12 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Does she belong in the "Indian Astronauts" category? She was a naturalized US citizen, and was in NASA, the U.S. space corps, not the Indian space corps. -- FelineAvenger 05:26, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Does she belong in the "Indian scientists" category? (Same reasoning as above). -- Zigzackly (talk) 22:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC) Reply

"First..."

[edit ]
Latest comment: 17 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

"...first astronaut to have been born in India."

This may cause some confusion. Rakesh Sharma was the first Indian in space. See: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/SPACE/space-human.html .

There is no confusion since Rakesh Sharma was India's first cosmonaut, so Chawla naturally is the first Indian born astronaut. --PremKudva Talk 11:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Reply

I propose that the above sentence be changed to:

"She was the first Indian-born woman in space."

I think this is clearer in stating Dr. Chawla's achievements.

Chawla was the first Indian to fly in the space shuttle. Vera Cruz

Probably. Some web sites like to say "first Indian-American" in space, but no doubt for any person in space, you can find some X that satisfies "first X in space", so these kinds of "records" are just pointless. -(

I know this is a late reply...but Premkudva the English genius probably DOESN'T realise that cosmonaut is Russian for Astronaut.... --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Reply

NPOV

[edit ]

This section at the end "She died a hero and a role-model for many young women, especially in India and particularly those in her hometown of Karnal where she serves to encourage young people to follow in her footsteps." seems way too opinionated for Wikipedia. I have not changed it, mind. Palnu 18:53, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

STS-87

[edit ]

I took out:

==Criticism==
Chawla was criticized for a 1996 accident which sent a satellite tumbling out of control.

I googled for her name + satellite + 1996 and couldn't find incident. Might this be a reference to her work with the Shuttle's robot arm on the Spartan Satellite during STS-87 in 1997? -- Infrogmation 21:38 Feb 1, 2003 (UTC)

http://msnbc.com/news/857733.asp?0cv=CA00#BODY Vera Cruz
On her only other space flight, in 1996, Chawla made mistakes that sent a satellite tumbling out of control, and two spacewalkers had to go out and capture it. Some saw this flight as her chance to redeem herself.
Perhaps MSN has the wrong date?
I guess so. Either way that sentance is no longer in that article when I just looked at it. All sources I checked said her previous mission was in '97. -- Infrogmation 21:56 Feb 1, 2003 (UTC)

I re-integrated it into the STS-87 section.

74th Street

[edit ]

Perhaps the reference should be changed to 74th Street in Jackson Heights, Queens? I haven't seen the street sign there recently, so I won't make the change. As a former resident of Jackson Heights, changing that street name seems a higher probability than any of the many other 74th Streets in New York. An unadorned reference to New York City usually leads people to think of Manhattan. Eddieuny 19:55:32 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)

date of birth

[edit ]
Latest comment: 5 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

While this article give the date of birth as 17 March 1962, other language versions say it's 1 Juli 1961, see fr:Kalpana Chawla. --Martinwilke1980 18:37, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Reply


Kalpana's date of birth was 7 March 1962. The 1 July 1961 date is quoted because that is what was used to enroll her in school at a younger than normal age. This manufactured date therefore became part of her official record.

Jean-Pierre Harrison

Why is her date of birth in the box listed as 17 March 1961, but the article body says "17 March 1962" was her actual date of birth?

GigaG (talk) 02:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Reply

ISU Scholarship

[edit ]
Latest comment: 13 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

This is now defunct. Still worth leaving there though, because I think there was one edition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.224.246.155 (talk) 11:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC) Reply

Death

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Possibly consider adding more information to her death. Adding a one to two sentence overview on the Columbia disaster could be beneficial for people finding quick information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerrittluoma (talkcontribs) 18:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kalpana Chawla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC) Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2018

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

change Punjab to Harayana. 68.181.88.1 (talk) 07:53, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Reply

Not done Haryana did not exist until 1966 so, as Chawla was born in 1962, she could not have been born there. - Arjayay (talk) 13:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Reply

Citizenship

[edit ]
Latest comment: 5 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Per MOS:OPENPARABIO we need to include her citizenship here, not her ethnicity. Unless there is reliably sourced evidence that she maintained an Indian passport as well as her US citizenship, she is considered an American, with ethnicity to be discussed in her early/personal life sections. Elizium23 (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Reply

Pronunciation of surname

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Is the first syllable of Chawla's surname pronounced to rhyme with jaw or with chav? Would the phonetic spelling be chaw-la or chav-la (or even something else)?

NASA recordings of her colleagues talking to her are unhelpful because they addressed her as "KC" (her initials; sounds like "Casey").

Reliable source(s) for replies would be appreciated (not original research or speculation). Thank you. Spideog (talk) 00:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC) Reply

Planned improvements

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 4 comments3 people in discussion

Hello! I am planning on improving this article. My main goals are to expand the article and improve its sources. I will be working in my sandbox, so there will probably be a huge edit coming through once I'm done. You can check on my progress there. I am a fairly new editor, so I apologize if I make mistakes. If there are issues with my edits, please let me know and we can discuss it here. Thank you! Spookyaki (talk) 04:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

Okay, edits complete. Many aspects of the article have been rewritten and reorganized. Some notable things:
  • I decided to change the date format to MDY per MOS:DATETIES. Chawla was an American citizen when she did most of the things she's notable for, and it seems pretty clear to me based on my research that she considered herself an American, at least in her capacity as an astronaut:

    Chawla became a naturalized US citizen in 1990, but many in India still consider her a hero of India. They almost always ignore that she had to give up her Indian citizenship and become a US citizen before she could even apply to become an astronaut. Chawla said, "I think for a lot of people there’s confusion," adding that before her first mission, people would call her mother and ask if they could talk to Kalpana please, because they thought she was still in New Delhi. She understands why people in India still feel a connection with her: "It’s understandable. I was born there; I grew up there for 20 years. If some people feel possession as a result of that, it is not anything unexpected." But she was always quick to explain to people, "I am part of the US astronaut corps." (Chien 2006)

  • I converted the "Honours and recognition" and "In popular culture" into a single section, "Legacy", and tried to order it as chronologically as I could. I also converted most of it into paragraph form. Some claims here were poorly sourced or not particularly relevant, so I removed them.
  • The "Personal life" section is mostly covered in the "Early life and education" section now, so I have removed it.
Again, thank you everyone for your patience. If there are any problems with my edits, feel free to let me know. Spookyaki (talk) 21:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC) Reply
YOU DID NOT HAVE CONSENSUS TO CHANGE DATE FORMAT. DO IT AGAIN AND YOU WILL BE BARRED FROM EDITING.07:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC) Abebenjoe (talk) 07:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
Hostility like that is out of line and someone who's been editing since 2006 should know better. Sgubaldo (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC) Reply

Removed Second Masters Degree

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

I found no proof in her NASA official biography, nor other sources cited, that she was required to obtain a second Masters Degree before doing her Ph.D in Colorado. If it is questionable, the NASA biography, for Wikipedia standards, is the authoritative source, as they would list all her degrees. There is no mention of a second Masters Degree from the University of Colorado. – Abebenjoe (talk) 08:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

The CU Boulder Alumni Association has her listed as receiving a Master's degree in Aerospace Engineering in 1986 before her PhD in 1988. https://www.colorado.edu/coloradan/2023/03/06/twenty-years-rememberance OrbitingJupiter (talk) 18:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC) Reply

Date format

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 6 comments4 people in discussion

Hi all! I was not aware that consensus was required before date format changes, so I apologize. Since that's the case, I'd like to open it up to other editors. Should the date format be changed from DMY to MDY? My argument in favor is above, per MOS:DATETIES. Do folks agree or object? Spookyaki (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC) Reply

I would support changing to MDY. While Chawla was born in India, the activities she is notable for were done in the United States. NASA also uses MDY dates for its public facing materials as far as I am aware. If you want to get more opinions, you could try posting a notice on WikiProject Spaceflight or other relevant ones. Sgubaldo (talk) 16:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
Currently 2:1 in favor of MDY. Technically a majority, but not what I would call consensus. I won't change it for now, but if more people have thoughts, feel free to add them. Spookyaki (talk) 05:44, 13 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
Changing to MDY seems perfectly reasonable to me (as has already been noted, Chawla has a strong connection to the U.S, and the majority of her biography covers life events that took place after her immigration to the U.S.). I would support. Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
  • Suport MDY. The article seems to be written in American English ("honor" etc), though there is no template to say so, so US-type MDY dates would be consistent. Pam D 21:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC) Reply
4:1 seems more like consensus. I'll go ahead and make the change. Spookyaki (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2025 (UTC) Reply

Edit at 08:52 on 11 July 2026

[edit ]
Latest comment: 14 days ago 4 comments2 people in discussion

I've just submitted an edit that significantly modified this article, adding and removing a sizable amount of content and sources. Most of these edits were limited to expanding the page, but I also removed some sentences that I felt were inappropriate or out-of-place in the article. Among my more contentious changes, I shifted the figure in the infobox for the time Chawla spent in space from 31 days, 14 hours, and 54 minutes to one day in the past. While I was researching, I couldn't find too many sources that supported the previous figure besides the source it cited, which was an old, archived site hosted by NASA. I found more sources confirming my proposed figure, which is accompanied by a live site that's also hosted by NASA. Other than those major revisions, I added captions to the portrait in the infobox, copy edited the prose for grammar and clarity, and modified the wikitext for readability. You can see the rest of my changes by looking at the revision history. I've put this edit up for now, but if anyone objects to something I did, please let me know! Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 08:52, 11 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Great work! I'd be happy to help you with the SFN citations if you'd like. I also wonder if it'd be worthwhile to try for a good article nomination again. I could go in as your co-nominator as one of the other major contributors to this article. Let me know what you think. Spookyaki (talk) 13:03, 11 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hi! Thanks for your reply. Yes, if you could help me with the {{sfn }} citations, I'd appreciate it deeply. About nominating it as a good article, if you think it meets the criteria, I'd absolutely be interested in doing so as a co-nominator with you. Should I add it to the GA nominations page? Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 19:43, 11 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
So sorry, am a little busy in real life, but am happy to work with you on a Good Article Nom. Looks like the SFN issues have been resolved. See the instructions here if you're interested. Spookyaki (talk) 23:39, 19 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

GA review

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 hours ago 4 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kalpana Chawla/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: SalmonofKnowledge(talk · contribs) 19:49, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Reviewer: Simongraham(talk · contribs) 11:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

This looks an interesting article and a cursory glance shows it is likely to be near to meeting the Good Article criteria. I will review this article as part of a Good Article review pledge. simongraham (talk) 11:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Comments

[edit ]
  • First, some general comments.
  • Overall, the standard of the article is high.
  • It is of reasonable length, with 2,853 words of readable prose.
  • The lead is appropriately long at 483 words.
  • Authorship is 46.2% and 3.68% from the co-nominators (Spookyaki and Salmon of Knowledge respectively) with contributions from 231 bots and other editors.
  • GPTZero confirms that it is highly confident that the writing is human. There are a few sentences that may have been enhanced with AI (such as "Over the years, she has become a household name in India because of her ethnicity and achievements, with scholarships and awards being made in her honor, usually to promote female or Indian participation in space exploration.") that may need to be reviewed.
  • It is currently assessed as a B class article.
  • There are some duplicate links, including to aerodynamics and Space Shuttle Columbia.
  • Consider "the Space Shuttle Columbia" rather than just "Space Shuttle Columbia" and "the prime minister of India" rather than "Prime Minister of India".
  • Although not a GA criteria, suggest adding ALT text to the images for accessibility.

Criteria

[edit ]

The six good article criteria:

  1. It is reasonable well written.
    the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
    • The writing is clear and appropriate.
    • I can see no obvious and significant spelling or grammar errors.
    it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
    • It seems to comply with the Manuals of Style.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable .
    it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    • A reference section is included, with sources listed.
      • Add publication dates and ISBN where it is missing (such as Launius 2008).
      • Add years to the citations that are missing them (such as MOSDAC 2024).
      • Add page numbers for chapters (such as Furuyama 2013).
    all inline citations are from reliable sources;
    • Sources are mainly books and peer-reviewed journals published by reputable publishers.
    • 75 is a press release. Please replace this with something independent.
    it contains no original research;
    • All relevant statements have inline citations.
    • Spot checks:
      • 1j confirms her time in space.
      • 2g confirms date and location over Texas and Louisiana,
      • 5b the listing of her siblings is on page 50.
      • 7d confirms UTA and her father's permission.
      • 12b confirms that Karnal did not have an engineering college.
      • 26b confirms the steps.
      • 47 confirms the statement.
      • 60 (add the author, Sadaf Ashsan, and date, February 1, 2023).
      • 65 confirms the award.
      • 72 confirms the foundation.
      • 72 confirms the foundation.
      • 73 confirms the series.
      • 76 confirms the movie.
    it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
    • Earwig gives a 32% chance of copyright violation, which means it is unlikely. The majority of common material are proper names like Congressional Space Medal of Honor, the NASA Space Flight Medal, and the NASA Distinguished Service Medal. There are some similar phrases to an article on Chawla by Mykah Jones on the TSHA website, but these are common phrases (like "Kalpana Chawla ...was born on March 17, 1962, in Karnal,,. India".
  3. It is broad in its coverage
    it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
    • The article covers her life and career without any significant gaps.
    it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
    • The article balances the need for detail with summary style well.
  4. It has a neutral point of view .
    it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
    • Suggest replacing "immigrated" with "migrated" for neutrality.
    • The article seems generally balanced.
  5. It is stable.
    it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    • There is no evidence of edit wars.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
    • The images have appropriate PD tags.
    images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
    • The images are diverse, appropriate and enhance the article.

@Salmon of Knowledge:@Spookyaki: Thank you for an interesting and well-researched article. Please take a look at my comments above and ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 00:04, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /