Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Skomorokh in topic Languages
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Objectivism, a project which is currently considered to be defunct .ObjectivismWikipedia:WikiProject ObjectivismTemplate:WikiProject ObjectivismObjectivism
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books . To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
WikiProject icon Philosophy : Literature / Epistemology Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
/
Taskforce icon
Philosophical literature
Taskforce icon
Epistemology
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category

[edit ]
Latest comment: 20 years ago 6 comments3 people in discussion

Shouldn't this have the philosophy book category label? uriah923 (talk) 19:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC) Reply

An edit war over the inclusion of categories? Seriously? The book is obviously a philosophy book, so why wouldn't it have that category tag, Buridan? uriah923 (talk) 17:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Reply

Honest... I wouldn't kid you. There is now a section at the bottom of the List of Philosophy publications talk page titled, "mediation" where that is exactly what is being debated. I'm just about to put a reply there. Give me a minute and take a look. Also, should you be willing, I'd love to see you make a comment as well. SteveWolfer 18:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Reply
You have a link to the discussion? Crazynas t 21:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Reply
Yes, the discussion is near the bottom of the Discussion tab's page in a section called "mediation" (and for several sections above that) for theList of publications in philosophy‎ - I don't know how to do the Wiki formatting to make that come out right, but here is the URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_publications_in_philosophy SteveWolfer 22:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Reply
This link works Talk:List_of_publications_in_philosophy#mediation (user:Uriah clued me in) SteveWolfer 22:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Reply

Main points of the book, please

[edit ]
Latest comment: 18 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

It would be helpful if the main points or theses of the book were summarized. -- DBooth (talk) 21:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Reply


Languages

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

Are there any sources which could verify the claimed foreign languages this book is supposed to be available in? I tried very hard to find a German translation and can only arrive at the conclusion that such a translation does not exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.195.197.70 (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC) Reply

Both Worldcat and the Ayn Rand Institute list Chinese as the only translation, though neither list may be exhaustive. You might have better luck asking at the reference desk. I've removed the section of the article for now. Skomorokh 17:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /