Talk:Danube Delta

About 44 km of the Danube Delta lies the Snake Island, a territory which belongs to Ukraine but claimed by Romania. I find this sentence hard to comprehend. What does 44 km refer to? /Habj 10:47, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

that should be about 44 off the coast of the Danube Delta. bogdan ʤjuʃkə | ^Talk 11:07, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pages and (and probably others) note a Herodotus' mention of the delta. Much more descriptive is . We should use these sources, at least as an inspiration. It would be better to find out more reliable sources for these statements, of course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miraceti (talk • contribs) 07:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC) Reply

The whole article needs a good clean up of the English used, that's why there are bits we can't understand! Maelli (talk) 14:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Danube Delta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061209042801/http://www2.unesco.org/mab/br/brdir/directory/biores.asp?code=ROM-UKR+01&mode=all to http://www2.unesco.org/mab/br/brdir/directory/biores.asp?code=ROM-UKR+01&mode=all

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck }}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Reply

This is not a bad article to read. B-class articles should be "mostly complete and without major problems", resulting that "Readers are not left wanting". It should certainly follow [[WP:policies and guidelines}]] A serious flaw is a lack of sourcing so an inability to provide inline verification. There are unsourced sections and subsections, clarification tags, and one section tag, and some of this has been ongoing since 2008. There are numerous figures, usually presented as "facts", with no sourcing. This might be acceptable at C-class (probably not) and if it may have been bot assessed. It needs to have issues resolved or be considered for downgrading. Otr500 (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC) Reply

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Danube Delta ESA23450088.jpeg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 13, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-06-13. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC) Reply