User talk:184.166.97.71

It matters exactly zero that a section is longstanding if it is citing facially unreliable sources. Per WP:BURDEN, do not replace this material without citing reliable sources for it. If you feel the table as it exists here is also unverifiable, then feel free to remove it entirely. Remsense .. 论 18:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I answered this on the Talk page of the House (astrology) article.

Yes, it does matter, actually. Respected outlets themselves base their readings on information from that page, and have been doing so. Either you know little about astrology (..that article can help you learn), or you're being frivolous. Deleting something is by definition not adding anything of value. Cell phones and social media don't have anything to do with a house interpretation. 184.166.97.71 (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

If you're engaging in good faith, I'll make clear that yes, actually, editing is just as much about what you omit or what you choose not to say. We should choose not to say things just because an anonymous self-published outlet does. Remsense .. 论 18:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

But, you're not saying anything that enhances the article(s) in structure or content. 184.166.97.71 (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

You're willingly violating site policy, which exists for good reason, and you know it. You are required not to readd that material unless you supplied specific inline citations to reliable sources for each claim readded. How am I supposed to work with you if you refuse to do that? It's clearly not up to anyone but you to deign that the material is lovely and fine, but most readers would have issues with that possessiveness. Remsense .. 论 18:52, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Yet, you think it's okay to self-rummage through articles and delete stuff like Elon Musk is the U.S. Government, because...? 184.166.97.71 (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Because no one cares what you or I or any anonymous editor have to say about this or any topic. Original research by us is less than worthless. That is why it is not allowed on Wikipedia. Remsense .. 论 18:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I'm not willingly violating any Wikipedia policy. LOL, don't be silly, lady. If you have better sources, then cite them. Just changing words/sentences/paragraphs - and to stuff even more bizarre - is ludicrous, and not a good practice, even for people with nothing better to do. ;) 184.166.97.71 (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]