Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Wikia's new "Style" causes uproar

Score: 1 Advertisements on this page

1. For. Something about this article made me laugh. ----_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80 ^☭ 01:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
2. Symbol for vote.svg For.-Its alright--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
3. I'm tempted to agree that it's short and not very clever, but something about it made me laugh too, and I'd be wrong to deny it my vote for that. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:30 Jun 13, 2008
4. We'd need to properly rape the Main Page though. Maybe we can call it a test run? — Sir Manticore progress-wheel.gif 04:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
5. Strong for. Too bad that the article's partially true, even...in any case, I'm wondering if Wikia paid TLB some $$$ for that against-vote, hmm. --Sai.png Jack Phoenix , professional (削除) killer (削除ここまで) admin (Whine ?) • (Wikia ♥ ads) 11:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
6. For --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 06:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
7. For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:28, Jun 17

1. Nah. Found it funny, but too meta-y and not quite good enough for the main page, IMHO. - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora.JPG (Nyah, see, n y a h !) 01:53, Jun 13
2. against. basically a one-joke article. if you take away the image, its not even close to being long enough for a feature. --Sir Gerrycheevers Gun Talk 02:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
3. Against. As per the above. Mr N MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:34, Jun 13
4. Against. I thought about writing exactly this article, and realized it could probably only be done if the whole thing were one large picture. On a monitor with a high resolution, that ad doesn't even look ridiculously intrusive; if you were running at 600x400, I'm guessing it's all you'd see. I also think it would be funnier if there were actual parody ads involved, and if the text weaved through them like it was navigating a maze. I think this is a funny idea but kind of a half-assed execution. --Hyperbole 21:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
5. Against. One joke - a funny one, but one nonetheless, and it's pretty much an in-joke. Did chuckle, didn't see a feature. --Sir U.U. Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:43, Jun 16
6. Against per the people who voted against. It would be like featuring Euroipods or AAAAAAAAA! or something in that there's only one joke. Nice image, though. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

• Abs. if I ever need an example of how to define an article that would prompt an abstain from THINKER , this would be it. I really like the article and think it is a great satire and very funny (I don't know why others aren't laughing as hard), but I also agree with the against remarks quite firmly as well. --THINKER 06:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank God, I can sleep at night now knowing what prompts an abstain from THINKER. :) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:33 Jun 17, 2008
    • My large, devoted fanbase needs to know these things, lest they lie awake at night in pools of their own icy cold sweat, wondering why...WHY! ...why? --THINKER 04:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)