top
up

4.2Identifiers and BindingπŸ”— i

The context of an expression determines the meaning of identifiers that appear in the expression. In particular, starting a module with the language racket, as in

#lang racket

means that, within the module, the identifiers described in this guide start with the meaning described here: cons refers to the function that creates a pair, car refers to the function that extracts the first element of a pair, and so on.

+Symbols introduces the syntax of identifiers.

Forms like define , lambda , and let associate a meaning with one or more identifiers; that is, they bind identifiers. The part of the program for which the binding applies is the scope of the binding. The set of bindings in effect for a given expression is the expression’s environment.

For example, in

(define f
(lambda (x)
(let ([y5])
(+ xy))))
(f10)

the define is a binding of f, the lambda has a binding for x, and the let has a binding for y. The scope of the binding for f is the entire module; the scope of the x binding is (let ([y5])(+ xy)); and the scope of the y binding is just (+ xy). The environment of (+ xy) includes bindings for y, x, and f, as well as everything in racket.

A module-level define can bind only identifiers that are not already defined or require d into the module. A local define or other binding forms, however, can give a new local binding for an identifier that already has a binding; such a binding shadows the existing binding.

Examples:
(define f
(define cons (append "ugly""confusing"))
(let ([append 'this-was])
> (flist )

'(this-was ("ugly" "confusing"))

Similarly, a module-level define can shadow a binding from the module’s language. For example, (define cons 1) in a racket module shadows the cons that is provided by racket. Intentionally shadowing a language binding is rarely a good idea—especially for widely used bindings like cons —but shadowing relieves a programmer from having to avoid every obscure binding that is provided by a language.

Even identifiers like define and lambda get their meanings from bindings, though they have transformer bindings (which means that they indicate syntactic forms) instead of value bindings. Since define has a transformer binding, the identifier define cannot be used by itself to get a value. However, the normal binding for define can be shadowed.

Examples:
> define

eval:1:0: define: bad syntax

in: define

> (let ([define5])define)

5

Again, shadowing standard bindings in this way is rarely a good idea, but the possibility is an inherent part of Racket’s flexibility.

top
up

AltStyle γ«γ‚ˆγ£γ¦ε€‰ζ›γ•γ‚ŒγŸγƒšγƒΌγ‚Έ (->γ‚ͺγƒͺγ‚ΈγƒŠγƒ«) /