GNU bug report logs - #78772
Feature request: glob-matching patterns

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 78772 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Prindeville <philipp <at> redfish-solutions.com>
To: bug-grep <at> gnu.org
Subject: Feature request: glob-matching patterns
Date: 2025年6月11日 21:29:35 -0600

It might be useful to have an argument like --glob-regexp to have a file containing globbing patterns to match (or exclude) against a stream of filenames.
Example:
find . -print -depth | grep -v --glob-regexp -f do-not-backup-list | cpio -ov > filtered-backup.cpio
Where files matching glob patterns in "do-not-backup-list" would be excluded.
Thanks

Message #8 received at 78772 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Dale R. Worley" <Dale.Worley <at> comcast.net>
To: Philip Prindeville <philipp <at> redfish-solutions.com>
Cc: 78772 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78772: Feature request: glob-matching patterns
Date: 2025年6月13日 14:07:59 -0400

Philip Prindeville via Bug reports for GNU grep <bug-grep <at> gnu.org>
writes:
> It might be useful to have an argument like --glob-regexp to have a
> file containing globbing patterns to match (or exclude) against a
> stream of filenames.
It seems to me what you want is an argument that causes grep to
interpret patterns as shell "globs" rather than as regexps. (Note that
the glob language is considerably weaker than regexps, and AFAIK they
are never called "regexps".) So a better name would be "--glob".
I can see value in that.
Is there an unambiguous standard for globs? I know that different
shells do globbing somewhat differently. Although I notice that grep
has these options that take glob arguments, so the code in grep must
contain a glob-matcher already, and thus a definition of glob-patterns.
 --exclude=GLOB
 --exclude-dir=GLOB
 --include=GLOB
Dale

Message #11 received at 78772 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Prindeville <philipp <at> redfish-solutions.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <Dale.Worley <at> comcast.net>
Cc: 78772 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78772: Feature request: glob-matching patterns
Date: 2025年6月13日 13:17:49 -0600

> On Jun 13, 2025, at 12:07 PM, Dale R. Worley <Dale.Worley <at> comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Philip Prindeville via Bug reports for GNU grep <bug-grep <at> gnu.org>
> writes:
>> It might be useful to have an argument like --glob-regexp to have a
>> file containing globbing patterns to match (or exclude) against a
>> stream of filenames.
> 
> It seems to me what you want is an argument that causes grep to
> interpret patterns as shell "globs" rather than as regexps. (Note that
> the glob language is considerably weaker than regexps, and AFAIK they
> are never called "regexps".) So a better name would be "--glob".
> 
> I can see value in that.
> 
> Is there an unambiguous standard for globs? I know that different
> shells do globbing somewhat differently. Although I notice that grep
> has these options that take glob arguments, so the code in grep must
> contain a glob-matcher already, and thus a definition of glob-patterns.
> 
> --exclude=GLOB
> --exclude-dir=GLOB
> --include=GLOB
> 
> Dale
Corrected. —-glob or —-glob-pattern ...
Yes, it seemed like a light lift using the globbing already included.
And POSIX globbing is fine.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.