Package: grep;
Reported by: Kevin Connor Arpe <kevinarpe <at> gmail.com>
Date: 2021年12月28日 14:56:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 52851 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox
bug-grep <at> gnu.org:bug#52851; Package grep.
(2021年12月28日 14:56:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.Kevin Connor Arpe <kevinarpe <at> gmail.com>:bug-grep <at> gnu.org.
(2021年12月28日 14:56:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
From: Kevin Connor Arpe <kevinarpe <at> gmail.com> To: bug-grep <at> gnu.org Subject: git grep feature: boolean logic Date: 2021年12月28日 22:55:32 +0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello, Recently, I was stumped with a difficult grep problem: I needed to filter files containing more than one regex (think: logical-and). I didn't know how to do this using only a single invocation of GNU grep. (Please correct me if I am wrong.) A bunch of Googling led me to discover that git has a grep sub-command that implements boolean logic with and/or/not/parens operators. Manpage: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-grep, Source: https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/grep.c At the moment, it's not possible to use git grep very well outside of git repositories. There are some issues around absolute and relative paths, plus "git working directory". Eventually, I settled on writing a crude shell script that wraps GNU grep to provide similar functionality. However, I am aware of its inefficiency, as it requires multiple invocations of grep. Are people aware of this very cool grep feature with boolean logic? I tried to search the GNU grep message archive, but I didn't see any discussion about it. I'm curious what the GNU grep team thinks about this feature. Kind regards, Kevin Arpe Hongkong
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
bug-grep <at> gnu.org:bug#52851; Package grep.
(2021年12月28日 15:45:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.Message #8 received at 52851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
From: arnold <at> skeeve.com To: kevinarpe <at> gmail.com, 52851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#52851: git grep feature: boolean logic Date: 2021年12月28日 08:44:14 -0700
Hi. You may want a different tool: awk '/pattern1/ && /pattern2/' ... awk '/pattern1/ || /pattern2/' ... awk '/pattern1/ && !/pattern2/' ... And so on. Seems much easier than stuffing boolean logic into grep. Just a thought, Arnold Kevin Connor Arpe <kevinarpe <at> gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Recently, I was stumped with a difficult grep problem: I needed to filter > files containing more than one regex (think: logical-and). I didn't know > how to do this using only a single invocation of GNU grep. (Please correct > me if I am wrong.) > > A bunch of Googling led me to discover that git has a grep sub-command that > implements boolean logic with and/or/not/parens operators. Manpage: > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-grep, Source: > https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/grep.c > > At the moment, it's not possible to use git grep very well outside of git > repositories. There are some issues around absolute and relative paths, > plus "git working directory". > > Eventually, I settled on writing a crude shell script that wraps GNU grep > to provide similar functionality. However, I am aware of its inefficiency, > as it requires multiple invocations of grep. > > Are people aware of this very cool grep feature with boolean logic? I > tried to search the GNU grep message archive, but I didn't see any > discussion about it. I'm curious what the GNU grep team thinks about this > feature. > > Kind regards, > Kevin Arpe > Hongkong
Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(2021年12月28日 17:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.