[フレーム] Skip to main content
Javascript disabled? Like other modern websites, the IETF Datatracker relies on Javascript. Please enable Javascript for full functionality.

Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6) Options for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers
RFC 3319

Document Type RFC - Proposed Standard (July 2003)
Authors Bernie Volz , Henning Schulzrinne
Last updated 2015年10月14日
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
IESG Responsible AD Allison J. Mankin
Send notices to (None)
Email authors Email WG IPR References Referenced by Search Lists
RFC 3319
Network Working Group H. Schulzrinne
Request for Comments: 3319 Columbia University
Category: Standards Track B. Volz
 Ericsson
 July 2003
 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6) Options
 for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers
Status of this Memo
 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
 This document defines a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 6
 (DHCPv6) option that contains a list of domain names or IPv6
 addresses that can be mapped to one or more Session Initiation
 Protocol (SIP) outbound proxy servers. This is one of the many
 methods that a SIP client can use to obtain the addresses of such a
 local SIP server.
1. Terminology
 This document uses the DHCP terminology defined in [1].
 A SIP server is defined in RFC 3261 [2]. This server MUST be an
 outbound proxy server, as defined in [3]. In the context of this
 document, a SIP server refers to the host the outbound SIP proxy
 server is running on.
 A SIP client is defined in RFC 3261 [2]. The client can be a user
 agent client or the client portion of a proxy server. In the context
 of this document, a SIP client refers to the host the SIP client is
 running on.
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
 In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
 "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
 and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119
 [4].
2. Introduction
 The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) [2] is an application-layer
 control protocol that can establish, modify and terminate multimedia
 sessions or calls. A SIP system has a number of logical components:
 user agents, proxy servers, redirect servers and registrars. User
 agents MAY contain SIP clients, proxy servers always do.
 This document specifies two DHCPv6 options [1] that allow SIP clients
 to locate a local SIP server that is to be used for all outbound SIP
 requests, a so-called outbound proxy server. (SIP clients MAY
 contact the address identified in the SIP URL directly, without
 involving a local SIP server. However in some circumstances, such as
 when firewalls are present, or local dialing plans, local emergency
 and other services need to be provided, SIP clients need to use a
 local server for outbound requests.) This is one of many possible
 solutions for locating the outbound SIP server; manual configuration
 is an example of another.
3. SIP Server DHCPv6 Option
 This document defines two DHCPv6 options that describe a local
 outbound SIP proxy: one carries a list of domain names (Section 3.1),
 the other a list of 128-bit (binary) IPv6 addresses (Section 3.2).
 Since DHCPv6 does not suffer from a shortage of option codes, we
 avoid the encoding byte found in the IPv4 DHCP option for SIP
 servers [6]. This makes the option shorter, easier to parse,
 simplifies appropriate word alignment for the numeric addresses
 and allows the client to request either numeric or domain name
 options using the "option request option".
 An implementation implementing this specification MUST support both
 options.
3.1 SIP Servers Domain Name List
 The option length is followed by a sequence of labels, encoded
 according to Section 3.1 of RFC 1035 [5], quoted below:
 "Domain names in messages are expressed in terms of a sequence of
 labels. Each label is represented as a one octet length field
 followed by that number of octets. Since every domain name ends
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
 with the null label of the root, a domain name is terminated by a
 length byte of zero. The high order two bits of every length
 octet must be zero, and the remaining six bits of the length field
 limit the label to 63 octets or less. To simplify
 implementations, the total length of a domain name (i.e., label
 octets and label length octets) is restricted to 255 octets or
 less."
 RFC 1035 encoding was chosen to accommodate future
 internationalized domain name mechanisms.
 The option MAY contain multiple domain names, but these SHOULD refer
 to different NAPTR records, rather than different A records. The
 client MUST try the records in the order listed, applying the
 mechanism described in Section 4.1 of RFC 3263 [3] for each. The
 client only resolves the subsequent domain names if attempts to
 contact the first one failed or yielded no common transport protocols
 between client and server or denote a domain administratively
 prohibited by client policy. Domain names MUST be listed in order of
 preference.
 Use of multiple domain names is not meant to replace NAPTR or SRV
 records, but rather to allow a single DHCP server to indicate
 outbound proxy servers operated by multiple providers.
 The DHCPv6 option has the format shown in Fig. 1.
 option-code: OPTION_SIP_SERVER_D (21)
 option-length: Length of the 'SIP Server Domain Name List' field
 in octets; variable.
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | OPTION_SIP_SERVER_D | option-length |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | SIP Server Domain Name List |
 | ... |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 Figure 1: DHCPv6 option for SIP Server Domain Name List
 SIP Server Domain Name List: The domain names of the SIP outbound
 proxy servers for the client to use. The domain names are encoded
 as specified in Section 8 ("Representation and use of domain
 names") of the DHCPv6 specification [1].
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
3.2 SIP Servers IPv6 Address List
 This option specifies a list of IPv6 addresses indicating SIP
 outbound proxy servers available to the client. Servers MUST be
 listed in order of preference.
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | OPTION_SIP_SERVER_A | option-len |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | |
 | SIP server (IP address) |
 | |
 | |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | |
 | SIP server (IP address) |
 | |
 | |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | ... |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 option-code: OPTION_SIP_SERVER_A (22)
 option-length: Length of the 'options' field in octets; must be a
 multiple of 16.
 SIP server: IPv6 address of a SIP server for the client to use.
 The servers are listed in the order of preference for
 use by the client.
4. Client Operation
 A client may request either or both of the SIP Servers Domain Name
 List and SIP Servers IPv6 Address List options in an Options Request
 Option (ORO) as described in [1],
 If a client receives both the SIP Servers Domain Name List and SIP
 Servers IPv6 Address List options, it SHOULD use the SIP Servers
 Domain Name List option. Only if no server in the SIP Servers Domain
 Name List can be resolved or reached, the client MAY use the SIP
 Servers IPv6 Address List option.
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
5. Server Operation
 A server MAY send a client one or both of the SIP Servers Domain Name
 List and SIP Servers IPv6 Address List options.
 If a client requests both options and the server is configured for
 both, the server MAY send a client only one of these options and
 SHOULD send the SIP Servers Domain Name List.
 A server configured with the SIP Servers IPv6 Address List option
 MUST send a client the SIP Servers IPv6 Address List option if that
 client requested the SIP Servers IPv6 Address List option and not the
 SIP Servers Domain Name List option in an ORO (see [1]).
 The following table summarizes the server's response:
 Client sends in ORO Domain Name List IPv6 Address List
 __________________________________________________________________
 Neither option SHOULD MAY
 SIP Servers Domain Name List SHOULD MAY
 SIP Servers IPv6 Address List MAY MUST
 Both options SHOULD MAY
6. Security Consideration
 The security considerations in RFC 3315 [1], RFC 3261 [2] and RFC
 3263 [3] apply. If an adversary manages to modify the response from
 a DHCP server or insert its own response, a SIP user agent could be
 led to contact a rogue SIP server, possibly one that then intercepts
 call requests or denies service. A modified DHCP answer could also
 omit host names that translated to TLS-based SIP servers, thus
 facilitating intercept.
7. IANA Considerations
 The IANA has assigned a DHCPv6 option number of 21 for the "SIP
 Servers Domain Name List" and the DHCPv6 option number of 22 for the
 "SIP Servers IPv6 Address List" defined in this document.
8. Acknowledgements
 Erik Nordmark and Alex Zinin provided helpful comments.
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
9. Normative References
 [1] Droms, R., Editor, Bounds, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.
 and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6
 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.
 [2] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
 Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M. and E. Schooler, "SIP:
 Session Initiation Protocol," RFC 3261, June 2002.
 [3] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "Session Initiation Protocol
 (SIP): Locating SIP Servers", RFC 3263, June 2002.
 [4] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to indicate requirement
 levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
 [5] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
 specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.
10. Informative References
 [6] Schulzrinne, H., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP-for-
 IPv4) Option for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers," RFC
 3361, August 2002.
11. Authors' Addresses
 Henning Schulzrinne
 Department of Computer Science
 Columbia University
 1214 Amsterdam Avenue, MC 0401
 New York, NY 10027
 USA
 EMail: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
 Bernie Volz
 116 Hawkins Pond Road
 Center Harbor, NH 03226-3103
 USA
 EMail: volz@metrocast.net
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
12. Full Copyright Statement
 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
 This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
 others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
 or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
 and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
 kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
 included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
 document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
 the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
 Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
 developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
 copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
 followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
 English.
 The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
 revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
 This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
 TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
 BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
 HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
 Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 Internet Society.
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 7]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /