Javascript disabled? Like other modern websites, the IETF Datatracker relies on Javascript.
Please enable Javascript for full functionality.
Experience with IPv6 path probing
draft-naderi-ipv6-probing-01
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|---|---|---|
| Authors | Habib Naderi , Brian E. Carpenter | |
| Last updated | 2018年07月11日 (Latest revision 2015年04月21日) | |
| RFC stream | (None) | |
| Intended RFC status | Informational | |
| Formats | ||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | |
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | |
| IESG | IESG state | Expired |
| Telechat date | (None) | |
| Responsible AD | (None) | |
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document reports on experience and simulations of dynamic probing of alternate paths between two IPv6 hosts when network failures occur. Two models for such probing were investigated: the SHIM6 REAchability Protocol (REAP) and the Multipath Transmission Control Protocol (MPTCP). The motivation for this document is to identify some aspects of path probing at large or very large scale that may be broadly relevant to future protocol design.
Authors
Habib Naderi
Brian E. Carpenter
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)