| Impact | Details |
|---|---|
|
Read Application Data; Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands |
Scope: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability |
| Phase(s) | Mitigation |
|---|---|
|
Implementation |
Carefully check each input parameter against a rigorous positive specification (allowlist) defining the specific characters and format allowed. All input should be neutralized, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including tag attributes, hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. We often encounter data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended.
|
|
Implementation |
Strategy: Output Encoding Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks. |
|
Implementation |
With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
|
|
Implementation |
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XMLHTTPRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth |
| Nature | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChildOf | Base Base - a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource. | 79 | Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') |
| ParentOf | Variant Variant - a weakness that is linked to a certain type of product, typically involving a specific language or technology. More specific than a Base weakness. Variant level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 3 to 5 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource. | 82 | Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes of IMG Tags in a Web Page |
| Phase | Note |
|---|---|
| Implementation |
Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined Prevalence)
Note: this is a curated list of examples for users to understand the variety of ways in which this weakness can be introduced. It is not a complete list of all CVEs that are related to this CWE entry.
| Reference | Description |
|---|---|
|
Bypass filtering of SCRIPT tags using onload in BODY, href in A, BUTTON, INPUT, and others.
|
|
|
guestbook XSS in STYLE or IMG SRC attributes.
|
|
|
Javascript in onerror attribute of IMG tag.
|
|
|
XSS in web-based email product via onmouseover event.
|
|
|
XSS via script in <P> tag.
|
|
|
Onload, onmouseover, and other events in an e-mail attachment.
|
|
|
Onmouseover and onload events in img, link, and mail tags.
|
|
|
Javascript in onmouseover attribute in e-mail address or URL.
|
| Ordinality | Description |
|---|---|
|
Primary
|
(where the weakness exists independent of other weaknesses)
|
| Method | Details |
|---|---|
|
Automated Static Analysis |
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Effectiveness: High |
| Nature | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| MemberOf | CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. | 990 | SFP Secondary Cluster: Tainted Input to Command |
| MemberOf | CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. | 1347 | OWASP Top Ten 2021 Category A03:2021 - Injection |
| MemberOf | CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. | 1409 | Comprehensive Categorization: Injection |
Rationale
This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.Comments
Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.| Mapped Taxonomy Name | Node ID | Fit | Mapped Node Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLOVER | XSS using Script in Attributes | ||
| Software Fault Patterns | SFP24 | Tainted input to command |
| Submissions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submission Date | Submitter | Organization | |
|
2006年07月19日
(CWE Draft 3, 2006年07月19日) |
PLOVER | ||
| Modifications | |||
| Modification Date | Modifier | Organization | |
| 2023年06月29日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Mapping_Notes | |||
| 2023年04月27日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Detection_Factors, Relationships | |||
| 2023年01月31日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Description | |||
| 2021年10月28日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships | |||
| 2020年06月25日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Potential_Mitigations | |||
| 2020年02月24日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships | |||
| 2019年06月20日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Related_Attack_Patterns | |||
| 2017年11月08日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Applicable_Platforms, Causal_Nature | |||
| 2017年05月03日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Potential_Mitigations, Related_Attack_Patterns | |||
| 2014年07月30日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |||
| 2012年10月30日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Potential_Mitigations | |||
| 2012年05月11日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships | |||
| 2011年06月01日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Common_Consequences | |||
| 2011年03月29日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Potential_Mitigations | |||
| 2010年06月21日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Potential_Mitigations | |||
| 2010年04月05日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Description, Name, Related_Attack_Patterns | |||
| 2009年10月29日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships | |||
| 2008年09月08日 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships, Observed_Example, Taxonomy_Mappings, Weakness_Ordinalities | |||
| 2008年07月01日 | Eric Dalci | Cigital | |
| updated Time_of_Introduction | |||
| Previous Entry Names | |||
| Change Date | Previous Entry Name | ||
| 2008年04月11日 | XSS using Script in Attributes | ||
| 2010年04月05日 | Failure to Sanitize Script in Attributes in a Web Page | ||
Use of the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE™) and the associated references from this website are subject to the Terms of Use. CWE is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and managed by the Homeland Security Systems Engineering and Development Institute (HSSEDI) which is operated by The MITRE Corporation (MITRE). Copyright © 2006–2025, The MITRE Corporation. CWE, CWSS, CWRAF, and the CWE logo are trademarks of The MITRE Corporation.