Timeline for Request: Please make takedown notice public, and upload it to Chilling Effects [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:48 | history | edited | Community Bot |
replaced http://meta.crypto.stackexchange.com/ with https://crypto.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 9, 2013 at 12:58 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 12, 2013 at 5:32 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2013 at 22:37 | history | closed | mikeazo Mod | off topic | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 22:36 | comment | added | mikeazo Mod | @MichaelPryor has requested that we close this so that all SE inc can have a canonical place to respond to this type of request they will all be in the same place here is the current place for reference. Marking it as off topic seems less than perfect, but probably the best option. | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 20:05 | answer | added | D.W. | timeline score: 21 | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 15:31 | comment | added | user1114 | Jaydles ♦ responded to the post on Meta Stack Overflow: "Sending fraudulent DMCA notices has risks more severe than making your company look bad (example). That said, at first blush, I like this idea a lot - sunlight is an awesome disinfectant. We'll look into this, and post a response shortly" | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 13:55 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCrypto/status/325608755695865856 | ||
| Apr 20, 2013 at 13:24 | comment | added | mikeazo Mod | Once we know exactly what the takedown said we can figure out 1) how to modify the answers to not be in voliation, 2) if necessary submit a counter-claim that there was no copyright violation. I've contacted the SE contact who deleted the question. I'll keep you posted. | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 9:05 | comment | added | Mark Amery | I agree that no rash action should be taken until SE makes the takedown notice public, but somehow I suspect that Ciphercloud are ultimately going to suffer reputationally for this. The popular press tend to be pretty brutal on companies engaging in blatant abuse of the law to silence criticism, and a company selling a security product whose capabilities they tell falsehoods about and that a few nerds can describe how to crack in a few paragraphs makes for a good story. Right now Googling 'Ciphercloud' gives you a pretty positive-looking first page of results. Soon it may not. | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 8:09 | history | edited | D.W. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Apr 20, 2013 at 7:50 | history | asked | D.W. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |