Commons:Administratoren
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
Diese Seite ist eine offizielle Empfehlung auf Wikimedia Commons.
Sie stellt Standards oder Verhaltensweisen dar, die von den meisten Benutzern befürwortet und generell befolgt werden. Du darfst diese Seite je nach Bedarf aktualisieren; schlage größere Änderungen bitte auf der Diskussionsseite vor.
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Bahasa Melayu
- Deutsch
- English
- Esperanto
- Jawa
- Lëtzebuergesch
- Nederlands
- Soomaaliga
- Tiếng Việt
- Türkçe
- Zazaki
- asturianu
- azərbaycanca
- brezhoneg
- català
- dansk
- español
- français
- galego
- interlingua
- italiano
- magyar
- norsk bokmål
- occitan
- polski
- português
- português do Brasil
- română
- shqip
- sicilianu
- suomi
- svenska
- čeština
- Ελληνικά
- беларуская (тарашкевіца)
- български
- молдовеняскэ
- русский
- українська
- հայերեն
- עברית
- اردو
- العربية
- فارسی
- مصرى
- پښتو
- अंगिका
- नेपाली
- मराठी
- हिन्दी
- বাংলা
- ગુજરાતી
- ไทย
- 中文
- 日本語
- 閩南語 / Bân-lâm-gú
- ꠍꠤꠟꠐꠤ
- 한국어
Diese Seite erklärt die Rolle von Administratoren (manchmal auch Admins bzw. Sysops) auf Wikimedia Commons. Bitte beachte, dass die Rolle der Administratoren und die Voraussetzungen, Administrator zu werden, von denen anderer Projekte abweichen können.
Wenn du die Hilfe eines Administrators brauchst, wende dich bitte an das Administrators' noticeboard.
Es gibt derzeit 182 Administratoren auf Commons.
Was ist ein Administrator?
Number of Admins: 182
- 1234qwer1234qwer4, ru, de-4, en-3
- 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
- 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
- 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
- A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
- Aafi, ks, ur-5, en-3, hi-2, ar-1
- Abzeronow, en, fr-1
- Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
- AFBorchert, de, en-3
- Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1
- Aka, de, en-3
- Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
- Андрей Романенко, ru, en-3, uk-3, be-2, fr-2, lv-2
- Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
- AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
- Anthere, fr, en-3
- AntiCompositeNumber, en, fr-2 (steward)
- Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
- Auntof6, en, es-2, fr-1
- Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, fi-1, pl-1
- Bedivere, es, en-4, pt-1
- Billinghurst, en
- Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
- BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
- Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
- Captain-tucker, en
- Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2
- Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
- Common Good, en
- CptViraj, gu, hi-4, en-3 (bureaucrat)
- Cromium, en, de-1, fr-1
- Cybularny, pl, en-2, es-1, de-1
- Czar, en
- DaB., de, en-1
- DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
- Davepape, en
- DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
- Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
- DMacks, en
- Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
- Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1
- D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
- Ebrahim, en-3
- Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
- Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat)
- Ellywa, nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1
- Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
- Érico, pt, en-2, es-1
- EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
- Explicit, en, es, ko-2
- Ezarate, es-3, en-1
- Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2
- FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
- Gbawden, en-3, af-1
- Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
- Geni, en
- George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
- Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
- Gnangarra, en, nys-1
- Gnom, de, en-3, fr-2, it-2, es-1
- GPSLeo, de, en-2
- GreenMeansGo, en
- Grin, hu, en-3, de-1
- Hekerui, de, en-4
- Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
- Hesperian, en
- Holly Cheng, en, ja-2
- Huntster, en
- Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
- Infrogmation, en, es-1
- IronGargoyle, en, de-1
- Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
- Jaqen, it, en-2
- Jarekt, pl, en
- Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
- Jdforrester, en
- Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
- Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-2
- Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
- Joergens.mi, de, en-3
- JoKalliauer, de, en-3
- Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2 (steward)
- Josve05a, sv, en-3
- Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1
- Kadı, tr, en-5, fr-2, az-2
- Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
- King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
- Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
- Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
- Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
- Kritzolina, de, en-3, fr-2, it-1
- Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
- Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
- Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2
- Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
- Magog the Ogre, en, es-2
- Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
- Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1
- Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
- Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
- Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
- Matrix, en, ta-2
- MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1
- MBisanz, en
- Mdaniels5757, en, es-1
- MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, no-1, sv-1
- Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1
- Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
- Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1
- Minorax, en, zh (oversighter)
- Missvain, en
- Mitchazenia, en, es-2
- Miya, ja, en-2
- Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1
- Morgankevinj, en
- MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
- Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
- Mys 721tx, zh, en-3
- Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
- NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1
- Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
- notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
- odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
- P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
- Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
- Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
- Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
- Podzemnik, cs, en-2
- Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
- Pyb, fr, en-2
- Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
- Racconish, fr, en-4
- Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
- Ra'ike, de, en-2
- Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
- Ratekreel, ks, en-3, ur-3
- Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
- Red-tailed hawk, en, es-4, pt-2, ug-1
- Regasterios, hu, en-1
- Rehman, en, si-1
- Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
- Revi C., ko, en-3
- Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
- Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
- Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
- Royalbroil, en, es-1
- RP88, en, de-1
- Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
- Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
- Sadads, en, es-3
- Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
- Satdeep Gill, pa, en-5, hi-5, es-3, fr-2, fa-1
- Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
- Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
- Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1
- Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
- Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2
- Strakhov, es, en-2
- TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
- Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
- Teles, pt, en-3, es-2
- Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1
- The Squirrel Conspiracy, en
- Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-1
- Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
- Triplec85, de, en-3, fr-1, hr-1, la-1
- Tulsi, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, hif-2, bh-1
- Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
- VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
- Wdwd, de, en-2
- Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3
- Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1
- Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
- Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1
- Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
- Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
- Yuval CT, he, en-3
- Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
- علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward)
- Abuse filter, (automated account)
- CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request
- KrinkleBot, (bot) see request
If 182 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily.
Technisch
Administratoren sind Benutzer mit folgenden Rechten:
- Bilder oder andere hochgeladene Dateien löschen und wiederherstellen bzw. gelöschte Versionen einsehen und wiederherstellen
- Seiten löschen und wiederherstellen bzw. gelöschte Versionen einsehen und wiederherstellen
- Seiten schützen und auch den Schutz wieder aufheben sowie geschützte Seiten bearbeiten
- Benutzer und IP-Adressen/IP-Adressbereiche sperren und entsperren
- Bearbeiten weniger eingeschränkter Oberflächenameldungen (siehe auch Commons:Oberflächenadministratoren)
- Dateien umbenennen
- Benutzer verschiedenen Gruppen hinzufügen und wieder daraus entfernen
- Upload Wizard-Kampagnen konfigurieren
- Einzelne Logbuch-Einträge sowie einzelne Versionen von Seiten löschen und wiederherstellen
- Seiten aus anderen Wikis importieren
- Versionsgeschichten von Seiten vereinen
- Missbrauchsfilter-Einstellungen bearbeiten
- Beim Verschieben die Erstellung einer Weiterleitung unterdrücken
- Die Benutzernamens-Ähnlichkeitsprüfung und die schwarze Liste unerwünschter Seiten- oder Benutzernamen außer Kraft setzen
- Gleichzeitig Nachrichten an mehrere Benutzer senden (massmessage)
- Höhere Limits in API-Abfragen
Diese Rechte sind allgemein als Administrationswerkzeuge bekannt.
Rolle in der Gemeinschaft
Administratoren sind erfahrene und vertrauenswürdige Mitglieder der Commons-Benutzerschaft, die zusätzliche Verwaltungsaufgaben übernommen haben und nach Konsens/Abstimmung mit den Administrationswerkzeugen ausgestattet wurden. Administratoren haben unterschiedliche Interessen- und Fachgebiete; typische Aufgaben eines Administrators sind die Bearbeitung und Erledigung von Löschanträgen, das Löschen von Urheberrechtsverletzungen, das Wiederherstellen von Dateien, das Schützen von Commons vor Vandalismus und die Bearbeitung von Vorlagen und anderen geschützten Seiten. Selbstverständlich können einige dieser Aufgaben auch von Benutzern ohne erweiterte Rechte erledigt werden.
Von Administratoren wird erwartet, dass sie die Ziele des Projekts verstehen und bereit sind, konstruktiv mit anderen auf diese Ziele hinzuarbeiten. Administratoren sollten außerdem Commons' Richtlinien verstehen und befolgen und gegebenenfalls den Konsens der Community befolgen.
Außerhalb von Rollen, die die Benutzung von Administrationswerkzeugen bedingen, haben Administratoren keine besondere redaktionelle Autorität durch ihre Position. In Diskussionen und Abstimmungen werden ihre Beiträge genauso behandelt wie die jedes anderen Benutzers. Einige Admins werden vielleicht einflussreicher, nicht aufgrund ihrer Position als solche, sondern aufgrund des persönlichen Vertrauens, das sie aus der Community gewonnen haben.
Vorschläge für Administratoren
Bitte lies Commons:Ratgeber zur Administratorentätigkeit.
Entzug von Adminrechten
Gemäß der Entzugs-Richtlinie können Adminrechte bei Inaktivität oder Missbrauch wieder entzogen werden. Bei einem Antrag zum Entzug von Adminrechten gelten die normalen Standards zur Ermittlung des Konsenses nicht. Stattdessen sollte der „Mehrheitskonsens" verwendet werden, wobei ein Konsens von mehr als 50 % ausreicht, um den Admin abzuwählen.
Bewerbung als Administrator
Alle Benutzer, die Administratorenrechte erlangen möchten, müssen durch diesen Prozess gehen und eine Anfrage zu Administratorenrechten stellen, das schließt auch alle ehemaligen Administratoren ein, die ihre früheren Rechte wiedererlangen möchten.
Gehe als erstes auf Commons:Administrators/Howto und lies dir die Seite gründlich durch. Danach kannst du zurückkommen und im folgenden Abschnitt deine Kandidatur starten.
- Nachdem du auf den passenden Button geklickt und die Unterseite angelegt hast, kopiere den Link zur Unterseite, beispielsweise „Commons:Administrators/Requests/Benutzername", bearbeite Commons:Administrators/Requests und füge ihn oben im entsprechenden Abschnitt ein. Danach umschließe ihn mit doppelten geschweiften Klammern (beispielsweise {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}), um die Unterseite einzubinden. Fordere eine Beobachtungslisten-Benachrichtigung unter MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice an, oder bearbeite MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice, um eine solche zu erstellen, wenn du Administrator bist.
- Wenn du von jemandem nominiert wurdest, akzeptiere bitte die Nominierung durch einen kurzen Kommentar und deine Signatur. Die Unterseite muss dann durch dich oder den Nominierenden entsprechend eingebunden werden.
Abstimmung
Jeder registrierte Benutzer kann sich an der Abstimmung beteiligen. Wenn ein Benutzer bisher erst wenige oder gar keine Beiträge gemacht hat, könnte seine Stimme jedoch nicht vollständig gewichtet werden. Es ist gern gesehen, wenn die Gründe für unterstützende- oder ablehnende-Stimmen angegeben werden, da dies dem Bürokraten, der über den Antrag entscheidet, bei seiner Entscheidung hilft. Eine gute Begründung, bei Bedarf mit entsprechenden Nachweisen, kann stärker gewichtet werden als eine bloße Pro- oder Kontra-Stimme.
Damit der Antrag erfolgreich ist, werden normalerweise mindestens 75 % Zustimmung und mindestens 8 positive Stimmen erwartet. Allerdings hat der bearbeitende Bürokrat einen Spielraum bei der Einschätzung des Community-Konsens und die Entscheidung muss nicht ausschließlich auf bloßen Zahlen beruhen. Die Bürokraten können nach eigenem Ermessen die Dauer einer RfA verlängern, wenn sie der Meinung sind, dass dies für eine bessere Bestimmung des Konsenses in der Gemeinschaft hilfreich ist.
Neutrale Kommentare werden zur Ermittlung der prozentualen Pro-/Kontra-Ergebnisse nicht mitgezählt. Jedoch sind solche Kommentare Teil der Diskussion, können andere Diskussionsteilnehmer umstimmen und dem Bürokraten beim Verständnis des Community-Konsens behilflich sein.
Cache leeren Benutze den untenstehenden Bearbeiten-Link, um die eingebundene Seite zu bearbeiten.
Administratorkandidatur starten
Wenn die Anfragen erledigt sind, sollten die hier aufgelisteten Seiten in Commons:Administrators/Archive archiviert werden.
- Bitte lies Commons:Administratoren, bevor Du hier postest oder abstimmst. Jeder angemeldete Benutzer kann wählen, wobei diejenigen, die wenige oder keine vorherigen Bearbeitungen haben, möglicherweise nicht vollständig gezählt werden.
No current requests.
Bürokratenkandidatur starten
Wenn die Anfragen erledigt sind, sollten die hier aufgelisteten Seiten in Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive archiviert werden.
- Bitte lies Commons:Bürokraten, bevor Du hier postest oder abstimmst. Jeder angemeldete Benutzer kann wählen, wobei diejenigen, die wenige oder keine vorherigen Bearbeitungen haben, möglicherweise nicht vollständig gezählt werden.
No current requests.
CheckUserkandidatur starten
Wenn die Anfragen erledigt sind, sollten die hier aufgelisteten Seiten in Commons:Checkusers/Archive archiviert werden.
- Bitte lies Commons:Checkuser, bevor Du hier postest oder abstimmst. Jeder angemeldete Benutzer kann wählen, wobei diejenigen, die wenige oder keine vorherigen Bearbeitungen haben, möglicherweise nicht vollständig gezählt werden.
Yann (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth )
Scheduled to end: 06:02, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Dear community,
today I would like to nominate Yann to be the next checkuser for Commons.
It appears that the most active CU for the last years, Elcobbola, is currently inactive, and I have the impression that there is some need for more hands. Per my personal perception Yann is currently the most active admin in CU releated areas. They have been CU already from 2007 to 2009, and appear to be consistently active in the last two years.
Yann has agreed in private to accept the nomination.
Thank you, yours, --Krd 06:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Thanks a lot Krd for this nomination. I accept it again, and I would be glad if I could help. Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Votes
- Support --— D Y O L F 77 [Talk ] 07:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support --— Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose per my and other comments at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Yann (de-adminship). DrKay (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Neutral Though he could get things done, I’m concerned the inactive CU called him
the singular worst admin on the Commons and routinely demonstrates ignorance of and disregard for policy [sic]
in the link above. I’m interested to hear how they feel now, though from the looks of it, that is not possible right now. 1989 (talk) 14:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]- Full disclosure: this commentator is also involved, per their comments at the de-adminship discussion. Brianjd (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support he is OK modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 15:23, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- i checked discussions about this and my suggestion to yann is please do your work with consedaretion of community's concerns(bad english sory). you are hard working user. we are here voluntary, dont burnout. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 15:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support — Jeffrey Beall (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC).[reply ]
- Oppose per Brianjd's first bullet point. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support I trust Yann. And he has the checkuser experience already. Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
(削除) Neutral per 1989, and (削除ここまで)the inactive CU has previously had to confron Yann on when CU checks can be performed. This does not bode well, but Krd's nomination statement lays the problem out pretty clearly: we need another CU. Whether Yann is the person to fill that role? I don't know. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 03:10, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]- I'm changing to Oppose,the incidents highlighted by AntiCompositeNumber are not indicative of the trust needed of CUs. We need another CU, but that CU shouldn't be Yann. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose per my discussion in the comments section. Brianjd (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Neutral - not sure where I exactly belong. While I agree that Yann is experienced and I have had good time with them, but the issues raised are equally concerning. I am staying neutral. signed, Aafi (talk) 06:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Neutral per Aafi. --TenWhile6 11:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Neutral I like Yann. He's very active and very responsive. Having said that, my issue is that checkuser is a right that requires buy-in from the community, e.g. trust, and reading through the comments here I'm not sure he has that trust. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 16:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose "Checkusers are highly-trusted administrators..." - seeing the comments here, maybe not. —kallerna (talk) 16:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support trusted admin Bedivere (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support, No concerns.--Kadı Message 22:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Strong Support --— Fit India 16:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support While Yann and I often disagree on the status of some images, I trust him completely to use the CU tools appropriately. The CU team can certainly use an experienced CU who has shown the willingness to put in long hours. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support I've been on the fence because, when it comes to advanced permissions, I trust the people in the role to know who the best candidates are. Krd nominating Yann counts for a lot, but so does Elcobbola's historical opposition. Jim being on board is enough to push me into support. I am slightly concerned though that, should this pass, two of the CUs are bus criticalities (Commons will have a very hard time absorbing their workloads should either retire). I'd like to see 4 or 5 CUs so that krd and Yann have more room to breathe. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I too have been thinking about this. I think it would be great if some relatively newer admins (with a good tenure both as admins and users) put themselves forward for the role. --Ratekreel (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Always a strong Support for Yann. Trusted & experienced contributor for over a two decade. Kind regards, Tulsi 24x7 13:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support -- Jakubhal 19:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support There are undoubtedly several points of disagreement that I could find regarding Yann's contributions. However he is very involved and
(削除) experimented (削除ここまで)experienced . But the more important, two members of the CU's team, who are both very experienced and trustworthy support this candidacy. I support that. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]- @Christian Ferrer: Did you mean ‘experienced’? Brianjd (talk) 07:08, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Brianjd: English is not my native langage, isn't it the same thing? Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- You did use the word ‘experienced’ in the third sentence. I missed that. The second sentence says ‘experimented’. To ‘experiment’ means to try something, as in a science experiment. The word ‘experimented’ does not make any sense in this context. I’m not an English teacher; someone else might be able to explain better. Brianjd (talk) 07:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Thanks you, I fixed it, it is because in french we can literally use "expérimenté" in both senses. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Trustworthy admin. I'm confident that Yann can be a good CU. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Due to the issues other people have raised. Although I'm on the weak side since I don't really see him abusing the checkuser right like he seems to love doing with the normal administrator privileges. Really, he should just be desysopped. The project would certainly be a lot better off if he was. That's a discussion for another time and place though. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support We definitely need way more help, and Yann is fully qualified. Jianhui67 T ★C 09:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Herby talk thyme 10:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Weak support - thanks Yann for volunteering and doing this mostly thankless work: the more someone is doing this, the more they get involved in possible controversies. Yet I would urge you to try and moderate your messages when editing in such a responsible position. "lol" comments and borderline trolling are unbecoming. --Enyavar (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support. During last de-adminship vote I supported de-adminship, but during last years behavior of Yann has improved considerably and now I support him. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support --Lukas Beck (talk) 10:40, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Иованъ (talk) 16:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Unacceptable threats by Yann and User talk:Yann/archives 61#Wheel warring on File:Flag of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.svg are far too recent to be considering granting Yann any further rights. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Could you explain your reasoning on the wheel warring case? Based on the discussion you cited, it looks like Yann apologised and fixed their mistake within 2 minutes, with no further issues, so it was no big deal. But the undeletion discussion (not as easy to find as it should be, once archived) paints a different picture. Brianjd (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yes, that was a mistake. I don't remember exactly what happened, but I may have come across Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, and saw that it was not deleted, and thought it was an oversight, not seeing the undeletion discussion. Adminship duty is difficult: deleting/blocking, and some people get angry; not deleting/blocking, other people get angry. Yann (talk) 09:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Could you explain your reasoning on the wheel warring case? Based on the discussion you cited, it looks like Yann apologised and fixed their mistake within 2 minutes, with no further issues, so it was no big deal. But the undeletion discussion (not as easy to find as it should be, once archived) paints a different picture. Brianjd (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support --0x0a (talk) 11:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support I personally found Yann as one of the most helpful admins in the project; he is very active and all of my interactions with them were overwhelmingly positive. I do think the community has raised valid concerns for some of their previous actions. But Krd's support does say a lot about Yann's ability to checkuser, so I will support this one. I do wish you keep the opposes to heart, however.--Takipoint123 (💬) 12:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Neutral I would normally support active users to get more involved, and Yann has been a hardworking community member, and I am thankful for their tireless commitment to improving Commons. Yet, considering the flag that is being discussed, I believe they need to show a little bit more temperance in their decisions and commit more strongly to the principle that people in this project are contributing in good faith even when they make mistakes. I had initially opposed, but now after a second thought I think neutral is more aligned with what I have stated, and I hope that if approved Yann does a great job. --Joalpe (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose per above. Checkusers need to be overwhelmingly trusted by the community. Janhrach (talk) 09:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose per above. ---Mateus2019 (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose same opinion as Janhrach. // Kakan spelar (talk) 22:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Absolutely trustworthy user. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Comments
- The votes section above has already raised concerns from the de-adminship discussion. Since those concerns are being discussed anyway, I also mention the following:
- Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Unacceptable threats by Yann: A discussion from this year where another admin and I listed such threats.
- Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Mirror_Selfie_of_erect_penis_with_removed_pubic_hair.jpg: An even more recent discussion about an incident involving me, where the candidate both formed a wrong conclusion based on non-public information and expressed that conclusion in a poor way, making me look bad.
- In both cases, the candidate addressed some of the underlying deletion/undeletion issues but failed to acknowledge any communication issues.
(削除) Even worse, in the first discussion, the candidate said: (削除ここまで)(削除)Big LOL. This is supposed to be a joke, but your sense of humor is quite obviously lacking... Do you have anything serious to say? Otherwise, please stop wasting my time and others'.
(削除ここまで)
- It is the second case that I find particularly concerning, since the community depends on checkusers to carefully analyze very non-public information and carefully communicate their conclusions. I was tempted to vote oppose on that basis, but I want to see more discussion first. Brianjd (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- The candidate did say that, and I still find it concerning, but it might be taken out of context. Or not. I’m too tired to decide. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Honestly, in my more than 20 years on Commons, that's the weirdest complain I have ever seen against anybody. OK, I got that someone didn't like my little joke on my talk page, but reproaching me that in relation to my work as admin or check user, sorry, but I don't understand. For those you might want to know the context, File:God is busy.jpg was on a T-shirt in India, and I find it funny, even more today than when I took the picture. In our world falling apart in every ways, God is probably busy fixing all problems, so They can't bother with the little problems of our community. Yann (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- You deserve credit for participating in this discussion, and for clarifying the meaning of my struck out quote.
- But your response also clarifies something else: you insist on continuing your petty dispute with Andy Dingley, while ignoring the real issues here. Brianjd (talk) 03:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- FWIW, Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above, but I don't have any issue with Andy, so I don't understand why they were so aggressive. Yann (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above
I linked directly to the diff by you, with your signature. Brianjd (talk) 09:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]- @Brianjd: Just to understand, what are you complaining about exactly? The erroneous closure of File:Mirror Selfie of erect penis with removed pubic hair.jpg, which I reverted? Or the disagreement about File:Indy Fuel new logo.png, which I undeleted and created a regular DR? FYI, the DR is still open, and for good reason: the outcome is far from obvious. Or File:God is busy.jpg on my talk page? Yann (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I thought my unresolved complaints were clear. Here is a summary of those complaints, which you have not addressed (or even acknowledged) at all:
- Per my contribution to the ‘unacceptable threats’ section, you gave an unnecessary ‘last warning’ to a new user who had already improved their behavior after previous warnings. (That section also raises other serious issues that you have not acknowledged either. (追記) One of those issues is an unjustified accusation of incivility together with an unjustified threat of a block, both made towards a fellow admin! (追記ここまで) I have not looked at (追記) the other issues (追記ここまで) closely.)
- Per the subsequent section about the erroneously closed undeletion request, you falsely implied that I had knowingly requested undeletion of a recent naked picture of a minor.
(削除) Per the comments above, you seem to have falsely attributed your own negative comment to Andy. (削除ここまで)
- Also, the fact that you have not even acknowledged the complaints described above is itself one of my complaints. Brianjd (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Just to be clear, I don’t give a damn about this ‘God is busy’ thing. I didn’t realize that my struck out quote was actually about that. (I would be more worried about the template {{Busy}} at the top of your talk page, but actually, you do respond swiftly to most queries, to the extent that you respond at all. So that is one good thing I can say about you.) Brianjd (talk) 13:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I think there is a lot of misunderstanding here. I mistaken read "Minor" for "Mirror". I am sorry that you thought that I had accused you of anything.
- When I talked about negative comments by Andy Dingley , I mean the ones they made there. I didn't attribute my comment to Andy.
- Leyo said that I threatened them linking this. I don't see any threat there. OK, I deleted this file shortly after tagging it. A regular DR would have been better, but I still think it is too complex to be on Commons without a VRT permission.
- I tagged File:Finnischer Eishockeyverband logo.svg with missing permission, and the DR created by Andy Dingley is still open. The Squirrel Conspiracy also thinks that is should be deleted. Yann (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- In view of all this, it seems to me that the complain raised by Leyo here lacks substance. In addition, the complain by Andy of the same page (which includes the ‘God is busy’ thing) looks like a bad faith attempt to criticize me.
- I am always ready to apologize and/or revert my actions when necessary. I am more aware than anybody that, on a multilingual and multicultural project like Commons, some misunderstandings and disagreements can ready become big conflicts. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Regarding the undeletion request, I appreciate the belated apology.
- Regarding Andy, I linked to the discussion as a whole, then later linked to your comment specifically. When you referred to my link, you were not clear about which one. So yes, there was some misunderstanding. I don’t think that was anyone’s fault.
- Regarding the threat to Leyo, I accidentally linked to the revision prior to the correct one. The correct revision was Special:Diff/987704578, where you threatened Leyo, a fellow admin, with a block. Anyway, the correct link was already provided at the ‘unacceptable threats’ discussion.
- Regarding the two files whose copyright status is in dispute, I have not looked at them closely, so I currently have no specific comment. I note that files that are considered copyright violations are often deleted immediately, regardless of tags or even discussions. I also note that these two files form context for the next issue.
- Regarding the ‘last warning’ to Xgeorg, do you have any comment?
- You have not acknowledged my complaint about the ‘last warning’ to Omar.idma. Brianjd (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I thought my unresolved complaints were clear. Here is a summary of those complaints, which you have not addressed (or even acknowledged) at all:
- @Brianjd: Just to understand, what are you complaining about exactly? The erroneous closure of File:Mirror Selfie of erect penis with removed pubic hair.jpg, which I reverted? Or the disagreement about File:Indy Fuel new logo.png, which I undeleted and created a regular DR? FYI, the DR is still open, and for good reason: the outcome is far from obvious. Or File:God is busy.jpg on my talk page? Yann (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- FWIW, Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above, but I don't have any issue with Andy, so I don't understand why they were so aggressive. Yann (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Honestly, in my more than 20 years on Commons, that's the weirdest complain I have ever seen against anybody. OK, I got that someone didn't like my little joke on my talk page, but reproaching me that in relation to my work as admin or check user, sorry, but I don't understand. For those you might want to know the context, File:God is busy.jpg was on a T-shirt in India, and I find it funny, even more today than when I took the picture. In our world falling apart in every ways, God is probably busy fixing all problems, so They can't bother with the little problems of our community. Yann (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- The candidate did say that, and I still find it concerning, but it might be taken out of context. Or not. I’m too tired to decide. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- This is not a major issue in itself, but since we are digging up a lot of old discussions here, it would help if you maintained your talk page archives correctly. Your archive links only go up to archive 61, but you now have 63 archives. Brianjd (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- ✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- If I had received so many "oppose", I would withdraw my candidacy. However I doubt my words would reach Yann, I have seen him block IPs in conflicts where he has not given the time to explain their edits or the required consideration to their opinions in the cases of several IPs. People with prejudices may work much but serve little. 200.39.139.21 16:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I was going to suggest it myself as a good faith measure towards the opposers on his part, but maybe it's better to let the process play out. It would be good if he at least acknowledged the feedback and criticism though since it looks like he ignored Brianjd's last couple of comments asking him to. I. E. Brianjd's comment on the 19th of February "you have not acknowledged my complaint about the ‘last warning’ to Omar.idma." Really, it's not a good look on Yann's end. I could see admins just not closing this either way once the time runs out even there's enough support for it. But a statement from Yann on the whole thing would be nice regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- If I had received so many "oppose", I would withdraw my candidacy. However I doubt my words would reach Yann, I have seen him block IPs in conflicts where he has not given the time to explain their edits or the required consideration to their opinions in the cases of several IPs. People with prejudices may work much but serve little. 200.39.139.21 16:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- ✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Oversightkandidatur starten
Wenn die Anfragen erledigt sind, sollten die hier aufgelisteten Seiten in Commons:Oversighters/Archive archiviert werden.
- Bitte lies Commons:Oversighter, bevor Du hier postest oder abstimmst. Jeder angemeldete Benutzer kann wählen, wobei diejenigen, die wenige oder keine vorherigen Bearbeitungen haben, möglicherweise nicht vollständig gezählt werden.
No current requests.