Is there any reason why all your methods are sychronized
? There are no shared variables, so the methods could be stateless. The passed Socket to loadUser
could be a reason why synchronized
is needed.
It is unusual to for the class User
, to have a constructor which accepts a Socket
. Data from the Socket
should probably be read elsewhere and after that the constructor could be called.
Instead of the File
class with its isFile()
and canRead()
methods, the more modern Path
-based API could be used. see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903335/java-7-path-vs-file https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903335/java-7-path-vs-file
edit: the properties of the User
class seem to be public or protected. This should be replaced by setters or a constructor which makes sure your object is in a consistent state. like
public User(String id, String userName, String password)
{
this.id=id;
// etc.
}
Is there any reason why all your methods are sychronized
? There are no shared variables, so the methods could be stateless. The passed Socket to loadUser
could be a reason why synchronized
is needed.
It is unusual to for the class User
, to have a constructor which accepts a Socket
. Data from the Socket
should probably be read elsewhere and after that the constructor could be called.
Instead of the File
class with its isFile()
and canRead()
methods, the more modern Path
-based API could be used. see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903335/java-7-path-vs-file
edit: the properties of the User
class seem to be public or protected. This should be replaced by setters or a constructor which makes sure your object is in a consistent state. like
public User(String id, String userName, String password)
{
this.id=id;
// etc.
}
Is there any reason why all your methods are sychronized
? There are no shared variables, so the methods could be stateless. The passed Socket to loadUser
could be a reason why synchronized
is needed.
It is unusual to for the class User
, to have a constructor which accepts a Socket
. Data from the Socket
should probably be read elsewhere and after that the constructor could be called.
Instead of the File
class with its isFile()
and canRead()
methods, the more modern Path
-based API could be used. see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903335/java-7-path-vs-file
edit: the properties of the User
class seem to be public or protected. This should be replaced by setters or a constructor which makes sure your object is in a consistent state. like
public User(String id, String userName, String password)
{
this.id=id;
// etc.
}
Is there any reason why all your methods are sychronized
? There are no shared variables, so the methods could be stateless. The passed Socket to loadUser
could be a reason why synchronized
is needed.
It is unusual to for the class User
, to have a constructor which accepts a Socket
. Data from the Socket
should probably be read elsewhere and after that the constructor could be called.
Instead of the File
class with its isFile()
and canRead()
methods, the more modern Path
-based API could be used. see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903335/java-7-path-vs-file
edit: the properties of the User
class seem to be public or protected. This should be replaced by setters or a constructor which makes sure your object is in a consistent state. like
public User(String id, String userName, String password)
{
this.id=id;
// etc.
}
Is there any reason why all your methods are sychronized
? There are no shared variables, so the methods could be stateless. The passed Socket to loadUser
could be a reason why synchronized
is needed.
It is unusual to for the class User
, to have a constructor which accepts a Socket
. Data from the Socket
should probably be read elsewhere and after that the constructor could be called.
Instead of the File
class with its isFile()
and canRead()
methods, the more modern Path
-based API could be used. see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903335/java-7-path-vs-file
Is there any reason why all your methods are sychronized
? There are no shared variables, so the methods could be stateless. The passed Socket to loadUser
could be a reason why synchronized
is needed.
It is unusual to for the class User
, to have a constructor which accepts a Socket
. Data from the Socket
should probably be read elsewhere and after that the constructor could be called.
Instead of the File
class with its isFile()
and canRead()
methods, the more modern Path
-based API could be used. see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903335/java-7-path-vs-file
edit: the properties of the User
class seem to be public or protected. This should be replaced by setters or a constructor which makes sure your object is in a consistent state. like
public User(String id, String userName, String password)
{
this.id=id;
// etc.
}
Is there any reason why all your methods are sychronized
? There are no shared variables, so the methods could be stateless. The passed Socket to loadUser
could be a reason why synchronized
is needed.
It is unusual to for the class User
, to have a constructor which accepts a Socket
. Data from the Socket
should probably be read elsewhere and after that the constructor could be called.
Instead of the File
class with its isFile()
and canRead()
methods, the more modern Path
-based API could be used. see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903335/java-7-path-vs-file