Int faster than Integer. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.
"Integer" is an arbitrary precision type: it will hold any number no matter how big, up to the limit of your machine's memory.... This means you never have arithmetic overflows. On the other hand it also means your arithmetic is relatively slow. Lisp users may recognise the "bignum" type here.
"Int" is the more common 32 or 64 bit integer. Implementations vary, although it is guaranteed to be at least 30 bits.
Source: The Haskell Wikibook. Also, you may find the Numbers section of A Gentle Introduction to Haskell useful.
Copy-paste from Haskell Int and Integer Haskell Int and Integer
Int faster than Integer. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.
"Integer" is an arbitrary precision type: it will hold any number no matter how big, up to the limit of your machine's memory.... This means you never have arithmetic overflows. On the other hand it also means your arithmetic is relatively slow. Lisp users may recognise the "bignum" type here.
"Int" is the more common 32 or 64 bit integer. Implementations vary, although it is guaranteed to be at least 30 bits.
Source: The Haskell Wikibook. Also, you may find the Numbers section of A Gentle Introduction to Haskell useful.
Copy-paste from Haskell Int and Integer
Int faster than Integer. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.
"Integer" is an arbitrary precision type: it will hold any number no matter how big, up to the limit of your machine's memory.... This means you never have arithmetic overflows. On the other hand it also means your arithmetic is relatively slow. Lisp users may recognise the "bignum" type here.
"Int" is the more common 32 or 64 bit integer. Implementations vary, although it is guaranteed to be at least 30 bits.
Source: The Haskell Wikibook. Also, you may find the Numbers section of A Gentle Introduction to Haskell useful.
Copy-paste from Haskell Int and Integer
Int faster than Integer. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.
"Integer" is an arbitrary precision type: it will hold any number no matter how big, up to the limit of your machine's memory.... This means you never have arithmetic overflows. On the other hand it also means your arithmetic is relatively slow. Lisp users may recognise the "bignum" type here.
"Int" is the more common 32 or 64 bit integer. Implementations vary, although it is guaranteed to be at least 30 bits.
Source: The Haskell Wikibook . Also, you may find the Numbers section of A Gentle Introduction to Haskell useful.
Copy-paste from Haskell Int and Integer
Int faster than Integer. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.
Int faster than Integer. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.
"Integer" is an arbitrary precision type: it will hold any number no matter how big, up to the limit of your machine's memory.... This means you never have arithmetic overflows. On the other hand it also means your arithmetic is relatively slow. Lisp users may recognise the "bignum" type here.
"Int" is the more common 32 or 64 bit integer. Implementations vary, although it is guaranteed to be at least 30 bits.
Source: The Haskell Wikibook . Also, you may find the Numbers section of A Gentle Introduction to Haskell useful.
Copy-paste from Haskell Int and Integer
Int faster than IntergerInteger. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.
Int faster than Interger. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.
Int faster than Integer. If you have acceptable limitations you should use Int.