Check out this link on the using directive <[using namespace std][1]><using namespace std > Placing a using directive in the global namespace (which you have done) contradicts the value of namespaces. Consider placing using definitions within blocks. Placing using definitions within blocks puts them in the local scope. For example:
void somefunction()
{
using std::cout;
using std::cin;
//some code...
}
Just like when a local variable losses scope when a program leaves the block, so does a namespace. This not only documents which names you use but also allows you to omit names you don't use. Even placing such using definitions at the start of a file is preferable to using an entire namespace such as using namespace std; You could also qualify the name with the scope resolution operator. For example:
std::cout << "Hello";
std::cin >> var;
This seems to be the prevailing method for many people. You decide which is best. [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1452721/why-is-using-namespace-std-considered-bad-practice/%22using%20namespace%20std%22
Check out this link on the using directive <[using namespace std][1]> Placing a using directive in the global namespace (which you have done) contradicts the value of namespaces. Consider placing using definitions within blocks. Placing using definitions within blocks puts them in the local scope. For example:
void somefunction()
{
using std::cout;
using std::cin;
//some code...
}
Just like when a local variable losses scope when a program leaves the block, so does a namespace. This not only documents which names you use but also allows you to omit names you don't use. Even placing such using definitions at the start of a file is preferable to using an entire namespace such as using namespace std; You could also qualify the name with the scope resolution operator. For example:
std::cout << "Hello";
std::cin >> var;
This seems to be the prevailing method for many people. You decide which is best. [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1452721/why-is-using-namespace-std-considered-bad-practice/%22using%20namespace%20std%22
Check out this link on the using directive <using namespace std > Placing a using directive in the global namespace (which you have done) contradicts the value of namespaces. Consider placing using definitions within blocks. Placing using definitions within blocks puts them in the local scope. For example:
void somefunction()
{
using std::cout;
using std::cin;
//some code...
}
Just like when a local variable losses scope when a program leaves the block, so does a namespace. This not only documents which names you use but also allows you to omit names you don't use. Even placing such using definitions at the start of a file is preferable to using an entire namespace such as using namespace std; You could also qualify the name with the scope resolution operator. For example:
std::cout << "Hello";
std::cin >> var;
This seems to be the prevailing method for many people. You decide which is best.
Check out this link on the using directive <[using namespace std][1]> Placing a using directive in the global namespace (which you have done) contradicts the value of namespaces. Consider placing using definitions within blocks. Placing using definitions within blocks puts them in the local scope. For example:
void somefunction()
{
using std::cout;
using std::cin;
//some code...
}
Just like when a local variable losses scope when a program leaves the block, so does a namespace. This not only documents which names you use but also allows you to omit names you don't use. Even placing such using definitions at the start of a file is preferable to using an entire namespace such as using namespace std; You could also qualify the name with the scope resolution operator. For example:
std::cout << "Hello";
std::cin >> var;
This seems to be the prevailing method for many people. You decide which is best. [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1452721/why-is-using-namespace-std-considered-bad-practice/%22using%20namespace%20std%22 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1452721/why-is-using-namespace-std-considered-bad-practice/%22using%20namespace%20std%22
Check out this link on the using directive <[using namespace std][1]> Placing a using directive in the global namespace (which you have done) contradicts the value of namespaces. Consider placing using definitions within blocks. Placing using definitions within blocks puts them in the local scope. For example:
void somefunction()
{
using std::cout;
using std::cin;
//some code...
}
Just like when a local variable losses scope when a program leaves the block, so does a namespace. This not only documents which names you use but also allows you to omit names you don't use. Even placing such using definitions at the start of a file is preferable to using an entire namespace such as using namespace std; You could also qualify the name with the scope resolution operator. For example:
std::cout << "Hello";
std::cin >> var;
This seems to be the prevailing method for many people. You decide which is best. [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1452721/why-is-using-namespace-std-considered-bad-practice/%22using%20namespace%20std%22
Check out this link on the using directive <[using namespace std][1]> Placing a using directive in the global namespace (which you have done) contradicts the value of namespaces. Consider placing using definitions within blocks. Placing using definitions within blocks puts them in the local scope. For example:
void somefunction()
{
using std::cout;
using std::cin;
//some code...
}
Just like when a local variable losses scope when a program leaves the block, so does a namespace. This not only documents which names you use but also allows you to omit names you don't use. Even placing such using definitions at the start of a file is preferable to using an entire namespace such as using namespace std; You could also qualify the name with the scope resolution operator. For example:
std::cout << "Hello";
std::cin >> var;
This seems to be the prevailing method for many people. You decide which is best. [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1452721/why-is-using-namespace-std-considered-bad-practice/%22using%20namespace%20std%22
Check out this link on the using directive <[using namespace std][1]> Placing a using directive in the global namespace (which you have done) contradicts the value of namespaces. Consider placing using definitions within blocks. Placing using definitions within blocks puts them in the local scope. For example:
void somefunction()
{
using std::cout;
using std::cin;
//some code...
}
Just like when a local variable losses scope when a program leaves the block, so does a namespace. This not only documents which names you use but also allows you to omit names you don't use. Even placing such using definitions at the start of a file is preferable to using an entire namespace such as using namespace std; You could also qualify the name with the scope resolution operator. For example:
std::cout << "Hello";
std::cin >> var;
This seems to be the prevailing method for many people. You decide which is best. [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1452721/why-is-using-namespace-std-considered-bad-practice/%22using%20namespace%20std%22