Skip to main content
Code Review

Return to Answer

replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

To catch up where ckuhn203 ckuhn203 got tired, I would like to finish ckuhn203's review.

To catch up where ckuhn203 got tired, I would like to finish ckuhn203's review.

To catch up where ckuhn203 got tired, I would like to finish ckuhn203's review.

I appreciate it, but it's noise and this answer is at least as good as mine.
Source Link
RubberDuck
  • 31.1k
  • 6
  • 73
  • 176

Don't mark this as answer, the credits belong to ckuhn203

Don't mark this as answer, the credits belong to ckuhn203

edited body
Source Link
Heslacher
  • 50.9k
  • 5
  • 83
  • 177

As it is senseless to check wether input > 999 in the case that inuptinput < 1 we can use the short-circuiting boolean operator OrElse

As it is senseless to check wether input > 999 in the case that inupt < 1 we can use the short-circuiting boolean operator OrElse

As it is senseless to check wether input > 999 in the case that input < 1 we can use the short-circuiting boolean operator OrElse

Source Link
Heslacher
  • 50.9k
  • 5
  • 83
  • 177
Loading
lang-vb

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /