Skip to main content
Code Review

Return to Answer

replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link
added 509 characters in body
Source Link
Heslacher
  • 50.9k
  • 5
  • 83
  • 177

EDIT based on comment:

The ~FirstClassRepository() method is what the compiler takes as beeing the Finalize() method of the object. If you forget to call the Dispose() method of that object, this method will be called at the time your object is destructed.
So as the method is implemented by calling the overloaded Dispose(Boolean) method with the parameter == false, only unmanaged ressources will be freed (where the comment is written) as the GC takes care of the managed objects.

Otherwise your implementation looks fine for me.

Otherwise your implementation looks fine for me.

EDIT based on comment:

The ~FirstClassRepository() method is what the compiler takes as beeing the Finalize() method of the object. If you forget to call the Dispose() method of that object, this method will be called at the time your object is destructed.
So as the method is implemented by calling the overloaded Dispose(Boolean) method with the parameter == false, only unmanaged ressources will be freed (where the comment is written) as the GC takes care of the managed objects.

Otherwise your implementation looks fine for me.

Source Link
Heslacher
  • 50.9k
  • 5
  • 83
  • 177

The one thing I am not satisfied about is the dispose method. In every repository I have to add a dispose method that calls the base dispose method.

IDisposable
The IDisposable interface should be impelemented in the base class. By using the default pattern of disposing, you will get this result

public class BaseRepository<TEntityType> : IDisposable where TEntityType : class
{
 private readonly DataClassesDataContext _dataContext;
 protected BaseRepository()
 {
 _dataContext = new DataClassesDataContext();
 }
 protected Table<TEntityType> GetTable()
 {
 return _dataContext.GetTable<TEntityType>();
 }
 protected void SaveChanges()
 {
 _dataContext.SubmitChanges();
 }
 public void Dispose()
 {
 Dispose(true);
 GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
 }
 ~BaseRepository()
 {
 Dispose(false);
 }
 protected void Dispose(Boolean disposing)
 {
 // free unmanaged ressources here
 if (disposing)
 {
 // This method is called from Dispose() so it is safe to
 // free managed ressources here
 if (_dataContext != null)
 {
 _dataContext.Dispose();
 }
 }
 }
}

But wait, what if you also need to dispose ressources of the FirstClassRepository object which descends from that object. Then the FirstClassRepositoryobject also needs to implement the IDisposable interface with the pattern below.

public class FirstClassRepository : BaseRepository<FirstTable>, IRepository<FirstTable>, IDisposable
{
 public FirstTable GetById(int id)
 {
 return GetTable().FirstOrDefault(x => x.Test == id);
 }
 public IQueryable<FirstTable> GetAll()
 {
 return GetTable();
 }
 public void Delete(FirstTable item)
 {
 GetTable().DeleteOnSubmit(item);
 }
 public void Add(FirstTable item)
 {
 GetTable().InsertOnSubmit(item);
 }
 public void Dispose()
 {
 try
 {
 Dispose(true); //true: safe to free managed resources
 GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
 }
 finally
 {
 base.Dispose();
 }
 }
 ~FirstClassRepository()
 {
 Dispose(false);
 }
 protected void Dispose(Boolean disposing)
 {
 // free unmanaged ressources here
 if (disposing)
 {
 // This method is called from Dispose() so it is safe to
 // free managed ressources here
 }
 }
}

If the FirstClassRepository obect doesn't need to dispose ressources you can omit the implementation of IDisposable.

Otherwise your implementation looks fine for me.

Some SO links
proper-use-of-the-idisposable-interface
when-should-i-use-gc-suppressfinalize

lang-cs

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /