I've since come up with an improved version, which isn't technically lock-free, but might be as close as you can get (nearly) lock-free job queue of dynamic size (multiple read/write) (nearly) lock-free job queue of dynamic size (multiple read/write)
I've since come up with an improved version, which isn't technically lock-free, but might be as close as you can get (nearly) lock-free job queue of dynamic size (multiple read/write)
I've since come up with an improved version, which isn't technically lock-free, but might be as close as you can get (nearly) lock-free job queue of dynamic size (multiple read/write)
I've since come up with an improved version, which isn't technically lock-free, but might be as close as you can get (nearly) lock-free job queue of dynamic size (multiple read/write)
code below is not thread safe
I've since come up with an improved version, which isn't technically lock-free, but might be as close as you can get (nearly) lock-free job queue of dynamic size (multiple read/write)
code below is not thread safe
Here's a silly example of how to use it http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/189255cefd561602Here's a silly example of how to use it .
Please let me know if you see any issues with it, or feel things could be done smarter! Please let me know if you see any issues with it, or feel things could be done smarter!
Here's a silly example of how to use it http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/189255cefd561602
Please let me know if you see any issues with it, or feel things could be done smarter!
Here's a silly example of how to use it .
Please let me know if you see any issues with it, or feel things could be done smarter!
- 98.1k
- 17
- 219
- 419