The code appears to be functionally correct, although you could simply choose to use a StringBuffer.reverse(). There is some discussion of this here here.
If you do need to roll your own reversing method, you can avoid using StringBuffer/StringBuilder at all and simply do new String(array) instead.
As a general point, if you're not dealing with multithreaded code you should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer you should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer.
The code appears to be functionally correct, although you could simply choose to use a StringBuffer.reverse(). There is some discussion of this here.
If you do need to roll your own reversing method, you can avoid using StringBuffer/StringBuilder at all and simply do new String(array) instead.
As a general point, if you're not dealing with multithreaded code you should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer.
The code appears to be functionally correct, although you could simply choose to use a StringBuffer.reverse(). There is some discussion of this here.
If you do need to roll your own reversing method, you can avoid using StringBuffer/StringBuilder at all and simply do new String(array) instead.
As a general point, if you're not dealing with multithreaded code you should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer.
The code appears to be functionally correct, although you could simply choose to use a StringBuffer.reverse()StringBuffer.reverse(). There is some discussion of this here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2439141/what-is-the-most-efficient-algorithm-for-reversing-a-string-in-javahere .
If you do need to roll your own reversing method, you can avoid using StringBufferStringBuffer/StringBuilderStringBuilder at all and simply do new String(array)new String(array) instead.
As a general point, if you're not dealing with multithreaded code you should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer (see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/355089/stringbuilder-and-stringbuffer-in-javayou should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer ).
The code appears to be functionally correct, although you could simply choose to use a StringBuffer.reverse(). There is some discussion of this here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2439141/what-is-the-most-efficient-algorithm-for-reversing-a-string-in-java
If you do need to roll your own reversing method, you can avoid using StringBuffer/StringBuilder at all and simply do new String(array) instead.
As a general point, if you're not dealing with multithreaded code you should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer (see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/355089/stringbuilder-and-stringbuffer-in-java )
The code appears to be functionally correct, although you could simply choose to use a StringBuffer.reverse(). There is some discussion of this here .
If you do need to roll your own reversing method, you can avoid using StringBuffer/StringBuilder at all and simply do new String(array) instead.
As a general point, if you're not dealing with multithreaded code you should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer .
The code appears to be functionally correct, although you could simply choose to use a StringBuffer.reverse(). There is some discussion of this here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2439141/what-is-the-most-efficient-algorithm-for-reversing-a-string-in-java
If you do need to roll your own reversing method, you can avoid using StringBuffer/StringBuilder at all and simply do new String(array) instead.
As a general point, if you're not dealing with multithreaded code you should probably use StringBuilder in preference to StringBuffer (see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/355089/stringbuilder-and-stringbuffer-in-java)