I am posting sample test runs for my usage of timeit
module for timing for the following code. I wrote it for this question this question.
I am posting sample test runs for my usage of timeit
module for timing for the following code. I wrote it for this question.
I am posting sample test runs for my usage of timeit
module for timing for the following code. I wrote it for this question.
Is this the proper way of doing timing Timing analysis of many test cases in Python or not
Chat room I am learning about timing analysis in Python. I used time
module before it was pointed out that timeit
module would be better for discussing this questiontiming analysis.
I am learning about timing analysis in Python. I used `time` module before it was pointed out that `timeit` module would be better for timing analysis.
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0643831414457
0.0445699517515
0.0446611241927
0.0616633662243
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0625827896417
0.045101588386
0.0443568108447
0.0607123363607
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0647336488305
0.0596154305912
0.0445711673841
0.0614101094434
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0689924148581
0.0502542495475
0.0443466805735
0.0903267660811
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0695374234506
0.0579001730656
0.0443790974415
0.0835670386907
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0675612101379
0.05079925814
0.044170413854
0.0681050030978
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0643831414457 0.0445699517515 0.0446611241927 0.0616633662243 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0625827896417 0.045101588386 0.0443568108447 0.0607123363607 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0647336488305 0.0596154305912 0.0445711673841 0.0614101094434 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0689924148581 0.0502542495475 0.0443466805735 0.0903267660811 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0695374234506 0.0579001730656 0.0443790974415 0.0835670386907 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0675612101379 0.05079925814 0.044170413854 0.0681050030978
Is this the proper way of doing timing analysis of many test cases in Python or not
Chat room for discussing this question.
I am learning about timing analysis in Python. I used `time` module before it was pointed out that `timeit` module would be better for timing analysis.
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0643831414457
0.0445699517515
0.0446611241927
0.0616633662243
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0625827896417
0.045101588386
0.0443568108447
0.0607123363607
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0647336488305
0.0596154305912
0.0445711673841
0.0614101094434
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0689924148581
0.0502542495475
0.0443466805735
0.0903267660811
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0695374234506
0.0579001730656
0.0443790974415
0.0835670386907
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================
>>>
0.0675612101379
0.05079925814
0.044170413854
0.0681050030978
Timing analysis of many test cases in Python
I am learning about timing analysis in Python. I used time
module before it was pointed out that timeit
module would be better for timing analysis.
>>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0643831414457 0.0445699517515 0.0446611241927 0.0616633662243 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0625827896417 0.045101588386 0.0443568108447 0.0607123363607 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0647336488305 0.0596154305912 0.0445711673841 0.0614101094434 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0689924148581 0.0502542495475 0.0443466805735 0.0903267660811 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0695374234506 0.0579001730656 0.0443790974415 0.0835670386907 >>> ================================ RESTART ================================ >>> 0.0675612101379 0.05079925814 0.044170413854 0.0681050030978
**Please note that** I started using Python 3 while I was still discussing the question. I won't be using anything specific to Python 3 so all codes can be run on Python 2. Anyone wanting to run new codes will just need to change the `print` statements. Nothing else.
**Please note that** I started using Python 3 while I was still discussing the question. I won't be using anything specific to Python 3 so all codes can be run on Python 2. Anyone wanting to run new codes will just need to change the `print` statements. Nothing else.