Since I'm new here I can't comment but https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038169/synchronizing-on-simpledateformat-vs-cloneThis brings up the excellent idea of pooling the formatters instead. Have you tried that and seen differences between using a ThreadPoolthread pool and a regular pool? If there's no difference perhaps it's better to use a general pool as you can then switch approach to how short/long lived threads you use without reimplementing your pool.
Since I'm new here I can't comment but https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038169/synchronizing-on-simpledateformat-vs-clone brings up the excellent idea of pooling the formatters instead. Have you tried that and seen differences between using a ThreadPool and a regular pool? If there's no difference perhaps it's better to use a general pool as you can then switch approach to how short/long lived threads you use without reimplementing your pool.
This brings up the excellent idea of pooling the formatters instead. Have you tried that and seen differences between using a thread pool and a regular pool? If there's no difference perhaps it's better to use a general pool as you can then switch approach to how short/long lived threads you use without reimplementing your pool.
Since I'm new here I can't comment but http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038169/synchronizing-on-simpledateformat-vs-clone https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038169/synchronizing-on-simpledateformat-vs-clone brings up the excellent idea of pooling the formatters instead. Have you tried that and seen differences between using a ThreadPool and a regular pool? If there's no difference perhaps it's better to use a general pool as you can then switch approach to how short/long lived threads you use without reimplementing your pool.
Since I'm new here I can't comment but http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038169/synchronizing-on-simpledateformat-vs-clone brings up the excellent idea of pooling the formatters instead. Have you tried that and seen differences between using a ThreadPool and a regular pool? If there's no difference perhaps it's better to use a general pool as you can then switch approach to how short/long lived threads you use without reimplementing your pool.
Since I'm new here I can't comment but https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038169/synchronizing-on-simpledateformat-vs-clone brings up the excellent idea of pooling the formatters instead. Have you tried that and seen differences between using a ThreadPool and a regular pool? If there's no difference perhaps it's better to use a general pool as you can then switch approach to how short/long lived threads you use without reimplementing your pool.
Since I'm new here I can't comment but http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038169/synchronizing-on-simpledateformat-vs-clone brings up the excellent idea of pooling the formatters instead. Have you tried that and seen differences between using a ThreadPool and a regular pool? If there's no difference perhaps it's better to use a general pool as you can then switch approach to how short/long lived threads you use without reimplementing your pool.