Timeline for "How are you spending your time on the computer?"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | Community Bot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 15:16 | comment | added | t3chb0t | @IanF1 You're right, I should have mentioned it from the beginning. Updated. | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 15:13 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 15:09 | comment | added | IanF1 | Worth pointing out that if you want to remove all items but not columns, listview.Items.Clear() is preferable to listview.Clear(). | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 14:36 | comment | added | Denis | Thank you for the great suggestions once again @t3chb0t, I removed the list.Reverse() and now i'm just comparing 2 -> 1 for ascending and 1 -> 2 for descending | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 14:30 | vote | accept | Denis | ||
| Jan 8, 2017 at 12:04 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 542 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 11:02 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 33 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 10:57 | comment | added | 404 | Indeed and that's the problem with C# (or rather those who code it), there's all this shiny black box stuff which makes it so easy to write cool-looking but inefficient code if you don't know what's going on underneath. | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 10:28 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 254 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 10:19 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 254 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 10:14 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 254 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 168 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 9:31 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 639 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 9:18 | comment | added | realvictorprm |
Hey hey, nice one! Things you mention in the performance section are so clear to me, that I always ask myself why other people don't think about what such stuff as add(..) is doing and how many time it costs. [Edited]
|
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 8:51 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 143 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 8:40 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1205 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 7:17 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 6:52 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1566 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 6:23 | history | answered | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |