Return to Answer

replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/

edited May 23, 2017 at 12:40

edited May 23, 2017 at 12:40

Read this question this question regarding the proper use of inline. If you get very similar results between the two Fibonacci functions, this may explain it.
Instead of abbreviating one function to fib(), name it inline_fibonacci() or something similar. It'll at least make the function calls less-confusing.
timedFibonacci() seems to be doing a little too much. Consider returning the final times and having main() print them.
If you won't need those commented-out lines, then remove them. Don't clutter the code.
Since the times are in double, it's not very likely that you'll get the exact same times.

Read this question regarding the proper use of inline. If you get very similar results between the two Fibonacci functions, this may explain it.
Instead of abbreviating one function to fib(), name it inline_fibonacci() or something similar. It'll at least make the function calls less-confusing.
timedFibonacci() seems to be doing a little too much. Consider returning the final times and having main() print them.
If you won't need those commented-out lines, then remove them. Don't clutter the code.
Since the times are in double, it's not very likely that you'll get the exact same times.

Read this question regarding the proper use of inline. If you get very similar results between the two Fibonacci functions, this may explain it.
Instead of abbreviating one function to fib(), name it inline_fibonacci() or something similar. It'll at least make the function calls less-confusing.
timedFibonacci() seems to be doing a little too much. Consider returning the final times and having main() print them.
If you won't need those commented-out lines, then remove them. Don't clutter the code.
Since the times are in double, it's not very likely that you'll get the exact same times.

answered Oct 8, 2016 at 3:24

answered Oct 8, 2016 at 3:24

Read this question regarding the proper use of inline. If you get very similar results between the two Fibonacci functions, this may explain it.
Instead of abbreviating one function to fib(), name it inline_fibonacci() or something similar. It'll at least make the function calls less-confusing.
timedFibonacci() seems to be doing a little too much. Consider returning the final times and having main() print them.
If you won't need those commented-out lines, then remove them. Don't clutter the code.
Since the times are in double, it's not very likely that you'll get the exact same times.

lang-cpp