Keyboard Shortcuts

File
u :up to issue
m :publish + mail comments
M :edit review message
j / k :jump to file after / before current file
J / K :jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
Side-by-side diff
i :toggle intra-line diffs
e :expand all comments
c :collapse all comments
s :toggle showing all comments
n / p :next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :next / previous line
<Enter> :respond to / edit current comment
d :mark current comment as done
Issue
u :up to list of issues
m :publish + mail comments
j / k :jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :open current patch in side-by-side view
i :open current patch in unified diff view
Issue List
j / k :jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :open current issue
# : close issue
Comment/message editing
<Ctrl> + s or <Ctrl> + Enter :save comment
<Esc> :cancel edit
Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(28)
Issues Repositories Search
Open Issues | Closed Issues | All Issues | Sign in with your Google Account to create issues and add comments

Issue 6567067: cmd/jujud: allow for a clean exit

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
13 years, 3 months ago by rog
Modified:
1 year, 1 month ago
Reviewers:
niemeyer , mp+126980, jayngrace666
CC:
jay1986blncs_gmail.com
Visibility:
Public.
cmd/jujud: allow for a clean exit When a unit or a machine dies, we want the unit or machine agent to exit cleanly, so prepare for the worker to return ErrDead in that case, and exit cleanly when the unit or machine is dead to start with. https://code.launchpad.net/~rogpeppe/juju-core/093-jujud-lifecycle/+merge/126980 Requires: https://code.launchpad.net/~rogpeppe/juju-core/064-uniter-upgrade/+merge/126714 (do not edit description out of merge proposal)

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 7
Created: 13 years, 3 months ago
Download [raw] [tar.bz2]
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+189 lines, -79 lines) Patch
A [revision details] View 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M cmd/jujud/machine.go View 3 chunks +7 lines, -0 lines 4 comments Download
M cmd/jujud/machine_test.go View 1 chunk +29 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M cmd/jujud/unit.go View 2 chunks +6 lines, -0 lines 2 comments Download
M cmd/jujud/unit_test.go View 3 chunks +85 lines, -28 lines 0 comments Download
M cmd/jujud/upgrade_test.go View 9 chunks +52 lines, -51 lines 0 comments Download
M upstart/upstart.go View 2 chunks +2 lines, -0 lines 1 comment Download
M upstart/upstart_test.go View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M worker/machiner/machiner.go View 2 chunks +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M worker/uniter/uniter.go View 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
Total messages: 3
|
niemeyer
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/machine.go File cmd/jujud/machine.go (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/machine.go#newcode58 cmd/jujud/machine.go:58: if err == machiner.ErrDead { Should this be ...
13 years, 3 months ago (2012年09月28日 14:54:54 UTC) #1
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/machine.go
File cmd/jujud/machine.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/machine.go#newcode58
cmd/jujud/machine.go:58: if err == machiner.ErrDead {
Should this be worker.ErrDead?
Also:
log.Printf("machine is dead")
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/machine.go#newcode61
cmd/jujud/machine.go:61: log.Printf("machiner: %v", err)
This should be changed with your suggestion.
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/unit.go
File cmd/jujud/unit.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/unit.go#newcode60
cmd/jujud/unit.go:60: if err == uniter.ErrDead {
Same as for machine.
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/upstart/upstart.go
File upstart/upstart.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/upstart/upstart.go#newcode96
upstart/upstart.go:96: normal exit 0
Nice.
Sign in to reply to this message.
rog
for reasons best known to itself, the branch corrupted itself, so i'm submitting in another ...
13 years, 3 months ago (2012年09月28日 15:39:45 UTC) #2
for reasons best known to itself, the branch corrupted itself, so i'm submitting
in another CL: https://codereview.appspot.com/6574060
https://code.launchpad.net/~rogpeppe/juju-core/093-jujud-lifecycle/+merge/126998
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/machine.go
File cmd/jujud/machine.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/machine.go#newcode58
cmd/jujud/machine.go:58: if err == machiner.ErrDead {
On 2012年09月28日 14:54:54, niemeyer wrote:
> Should this be worker.ErrDead?
> 
> Also:
> 
> log.Printf("machine is dead")
Done.
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/machine.go#newcode61
cmd/jujud/machine.go:61: log.Printf("machiner: %v", err)
On 2012年09月28日 14:54:54, niemeyer wrote:
> This should be changed with your suggestion.
Done.
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/unit.go
File cmd/jujud/unit.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6567067/diff/1/cmd/jujud/unit.go#newcode60
cmd/jujud/unit.go:60: if err == uniter.ErrDead {
On 2012年09月28日 14:54:54, niemeyer wrote:
> Same as for machine.
Done.
Sign in to reply to this message.
jayngrace666
1 year, 1 month ago (2024年12月06日 06:03:26 UTC) #3
Sign in to reply to this message.
|
Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /