|
|
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 1
Total messages: 2
|
wan
http://codereview.appspot.com/4442041/diff/1/include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h File include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4442041/diff/1/include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h#newcode210 include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h:210: const operand2_type::value_type* const& str, \ We don't need GTEST_CREF_WORKAROUND_ ...
|
14 years, 9 months ago (2011年04月15日 18:01:07 UTC) #1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
http://codereview.appspot.com/4442041/diff/1/include/gtest/internal/gtest-int... File include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4442041/diff/1/include/gtest/internal/gtest-int... include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h:210: const operand2_type::value_type* const& str, \ We don't need GTEST_CREF_WORKAROUND_ here?
I remember needing this here too. To be honest I'm not 100% if it works without it. I also figured that it's the same pattern and that it meritted refactoring. On 2011年04月15日 18:01:07, wan wrote: > http://codereview.appspot.com/4442041/diff/1/include/gtest/internal/gtest-int... > File include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4442041/diff/1/include/gtest/internal/gtest-int... > include/gtest/internal/gtest-internal.h:210: const operand2_type::value_type* > const& str, \ > We don't need GTEST_CREF_WORKAROUND_ here?