Set up CI #54

AljoschaMeyer commented 2026年07月06日 08:00:29 +02:00

We should run tests and clippy on commits to main.

We should run tests and clippy on commits to `main`.

AljoschaMeyer commented 2026年07月06日 08:01:42 +02:00

(also for bab_rs, ufotofu, and sneakerweb)

(also for [`bab_rs`](https://codeberg.org/worm-blossom/bab_rs), [ufotofu](https://codeberg.org/worm-blossom/ufotofu), and [sneakerweb](https://codeberg.org/worm-blossom/sneakerweb))

fryeb commented 2026年07月07日 06:05:54 +02:00

I'd be keen to help out with this. Is the plan to use Codeberg's hosted woodpecker CI or set up CI infrastructure externally? (the former is probably simpler, but one of the maintainers will need to apply for access).

I'd be keen to help out with this. Is the plan to use Codeberg's [hosted woodpecker CI](https://docs.codeberg.org/ci/#using-codeberg's-instance-of-woodpecker-ci) or set up CI infrastructure externally? (the former is probably simpler, but one of the maintainers will need to apply for access).

AljoschaMeyer commented 2026年07月07日 12:42:20 +02:00

Unit tests, lints and formatting are probably sufficiently small workloads that we wouldn't need to feel bad for using the hosted CI? I could apply for that.

(but also CC @miaourt who had offered a while ago to set up external infra)

Unit tests, lints and formatting are probably sufficiently small workloads that we wouldn't need to feel bad for using the hosted CI? I could apply for that. (but also CC @miaourt who had offered a while ago to set up external infra)