librewolf/issues
25
145

[ER] Suggestions to make letterboxing more friendly/usable #2759

Open
opened 2025年12月20日 09:46:09 +01:00 by tclementdev · 4 comments

Hello, I tried using letterboxing but unfortunately I can't make it feel right to me. So I wanted to suggest adding a few options which I think would make it more friendly. Not sure if it matters much but I'll mention it when Mullvad has the option.

  • center the letterbox vertically in the window (Mullvad offers a setting for this)
  • reuse the last window size when opening a new window / relaunching the app (Mullvad offers a setting for this)
  • set a distinct background color that appears outside of the letterbox + border color around the letterboxed content
Hello, I tried using letterboxing but unfortunately I can't make it feel right to me. So I wanted to suggest adding a few options which I think would make it more friendly. Not sure if it matters much but I'll mention it when Mullvad has the option. - center the letterbox vertically in the window (Mullvad offers a setting for this) - reuse the last window size when opening a new window / relaunching the app (Mullvad offers a setting for this) - set a distinct background color that appears outside of the letterbox + border color around the letterboxed content

Actually, reusing the last window size may be just broken on macOS? It seems like it is reusing the last window size when testing on Linux.

Actually, reusing the last window size may be just broken on macOS? It seems like it is reusing the last window size when testing on Linux.
tclementdev changed title from (削除) [ER] Improvements to make letterboxing more usable (削除ここまで) to [ER] Suggestions to make letterboxing more friendly/usable 2025年12月20日 09:57:12 +01:00

I think you shouldn't even use letterboxing at all, it's not necessary. Because it makes you even more unique and stand out. You can test it for yourself. Go on CoverYourTracks site, make Librewolf fullscreen, enable RFP, enable letterboxing. Now test and look at the "one in x" metric. Note it. Now, make Librewolf windowed, with either letterboxing enabled or disabled, it doesn't matter, but with rfp. You'll see it'll make you less unique. So that's generally better - using the browser in windowed mode instead of relying on letterboxing which makes you even more unique in fullscreen.

I think you shouldn't even use letterboxing at all, it's not necessary. Because it makes you even more unique and stand out. You can test it for yourself. Go on CoverYourTracks site, make Librewolf fullscreen, enable RFP, enable letterboxing. Now test and look at the "one in x" metric. Note it. Now, make Librewolf windowed, with either letterboxing enabled or disabled, it doesn't matter, but with rfp. You'll see it'll make you less unique. So that's generally better - using the browser in windowed mode instead of relying on letterboxing which makes you even more unique in fullscreen.

Oh now I'm confused, I thought letterboxing would put more people together into the same size steps and therefore make them less unique. The initial reason I enabled letterboxing is because I wanted LibreWolf to always reuse the last window size, and I thought letterboxing would help privacy in that case.

Oh now I'm confused, I thought letterboxing would put more people together into the same size steps and therefore make them less unique. The initial reason I enabled letterboxing is because I wanted LibreWolf to always reuse the last window size, and I thought letterboxing would help privacy in that case.

@MrFox wrote in #2759 (comment):

I think you shouldn't even use letterboxing at all, it's not necessary. Because it makes you even more unique and stand out. You can test it for yourself. Go on CoverYourTracks site, make Librewolf fullscreen, enable RFP, enable letterboxing. Now test and look at the "one in x" metric. Note it. Now, make Librewolf windowed, with either letterboxing enabled or disabled, it doesn't matter, but with rfp. You'll see it'll make you less unique. So that's generally better - using the browser in windowed mode instead of relying on letterboxing which makes you even more unique in fullscreen.

You don't seem to be making much sense here...?

@MrFox wrote in https://codeberg.org/librewolf/issues/issues/2759#issuecomment-9120216: > I think you shouldn't even use letterboxing at all, it's not necessary. Because it makes you even more unique and stand out. You can test it for yourself. Go on CoverYourTracks site, make Librewolf fullscreen, enable RFP, enable letterboxing. Now test and look at the "one in x" metric. Note it. Now, make Librewolf windowed, with either letterboxing enabled or disabled, it doesn't matter, but with rfp. You'll see it'll make you less unique. So that's generally better - using the browser in windowed mode instead of relying on letterboxing which makes you even more unique in fullscreen. You don't seem to be making much sense here...?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
Branding
Issues that relate to our logo or the branding of our browser and website.
Broken Upstream
Issue is also present in Firefox
Build
Alpine
Issues specific to the Alpine Linux build of LibreWolf.
Build
AppImage
Issues specific to the AppImage release of LibreWolf.
Build
AUR
Issues specific to the AUR build of LibreWolf.
Build
Debian
Issues specific to our official release for Debian based distros.
Build
DebianOBS
Issues specific to the non-official OBS build of LibreWolf.
Build
Fedora
Issues specific to our official release for Fedora.
Build
FedoraCOPR
Issues specific to the non-official COPR build of LibreWolf.
Build
Flatpak
Issues specific to the Flatpak release of LibreWolf.
Build
Gentoo
Issues specific to the Gentoo build of LibreWolf.
Component: Infrastructure
Issues related to infrastructure provided by LibreWolf
Component
Builds
Issues related to how we build LibreWolf
Component
Patches
Issue with one of the patches in our source code.
Component
Settings
Issues related to the settings of LibreWolf.
Component
UI
A purely cosmetic issue in our browser.
Component
Website
Issues with our website.
Docs
Change required
A needed change in our documentation.
Docs
FYI
Issues that document a change, or how stuff gets patched, built or configured.
Flag
Caution
Change that might be tricky or that needs to be carefully evaluated. Best suited for core members.
Flag
Good first issue
Suited for a first contribution as it is a straightfoward task!
FreeBSD
Issues related to the FreeBSD release of LibreWolf.
Linux
Issues realted to one or all our Linux releases.
macOS
Issues realated to the MacOS release of LibreWolf.
Needed
Help
We are stuck :-(
Needed
Info
Closing in ten days if no details are provided.
Needed
Testing
We are almost there!
Prio
High
Issues with a high priority
Prio
Low
Prio
Normal
Prio/Urgent
Issues needing immediate attention
Repositories
An issue with our repositories.
Research
Collecting informations to document something or to evaluate a change.
Source
Issues related to the source code of LibreWolf.
Status
Blocked
An issue blocked by another one.
Status
Duplicate
Look for existing issues.
Status
Icebox
Change that is not happening soon or issue that cannot be tested.
Status
Known issue
An issue that we are aware of but that we cannot fix at the moment.
Status
Not Planned
The requested feature is currently not planned
Status
Upstream
Either we upstreamed the issue or a fix is coming directly from Mozilla!
Status
Won't fix
Does not require a fix.
Type
?
What?
Type
Bug
Ouch...
Type
Discussion
Let's have a talk...
Type
Feature
A feature request.
Type
Question
Not a issue but just a user question
Type
Task
This needs to be done
Windows
Issues related to the Windows release of Librewolf.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
librewolf/issues#2759
Reference in a new issue
librewolf/issues
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?