Hi, thanks for opening the issue. First time I am hearing about this app store. Is this a GrapheneOS default store or just a standalone one? No promise when, but I will add it to Accrescent app store.

👍 2

mmarif added the

🏗️

Build

label

2025年05月03日 17:21:32 +02:00

ptibouchon commented

2025年05月03日 23:29:50 +02:00

Author

Copy link

@mmarif

Is this a GrapheneOS default store or just a standalone one?

From what I know about Accrescent :

It is still in alpha
It comes from the GrapheneOS community
It can be downloaded from the GrapheneOS store but is different from the GrapheneOS store (because it is what GrapheneOS promotes to download apps I think) but it is not specific to GrapheneOS and it can also be downloaded from any android device.
It is not (or will not be) open-source only apps like F-Droid

(I think having more Play Store alternatives is a good thing and should be encouraged, that is the reason for this issue)

@mmarif > Is this a GrapheneOS default store or just a standalone one? From what I know about Accrescent : - It is still in alpha - It comes from the GrapheneOS community - It can be downloaded from the GrapheneOS store but is different from the GrapheneOS store (because it is what GrapheneOS promotes to download apps I think) but it is not specific to GrapheneOS and it can also be downloaded from any android device. - It is not (or will not be) open-source only apps like F-Droid (I think having more Play Store alternatives is a good thing and should be encouraged, that is the reason for this issue)

mmarif commented

2026年01月13日 20:52:46 +01:00

Owner

Copy link

Tried to create an account on their console and was greeted with the registration on invite only message.

Also right now it only accepts GitHub logins, strange. I get the idea behind it to avoid bots/spam accounts, but it could have been handled in a more proper way with other options.

Also the "Domain Verification" process does not make sense to me. It is not necessary that user own the the domain similar to the app ID. There could be different scenarios in that case for having totally different ID. App could be com.domain. and user may have domain.net or no domain at all or sub domain.

Anyway their site, their rules. But right now I don't see GitNex will be soon there.

Tried to create an account on their [console](https://console.accrescent.app) and was greeted with the registration on invite only message. Also right now it only accepts GitHub logins, strange. I get the idea behind it to avoid bots/spam accounts, but it could have been handled in a more proper way with other options. Also the "Domain Verification" process does not make sense to me. It is not necessary that user own the the domain similar to the app ID. There could be different scenarios in that case for having totally different ID. App could be `com.domain.` and user may have `domain.net` or no domain at all or sub domain. Anyway their site, their rules. But right now I don't see GitNex will be soon there.

Screenshot_20260114_004257.png

22 KiB

Screenshot_20260114_004257.png

No Branch/Tag specified

Branches Tags

main

release-14.0

android-17-permission-feature

release-13.0

release-12.0

release-11.0

release-10.0