Discussing the content of the website #2

Ghost commented 2022年11月06日 11:16:55 +01:00

• tagline Beyond Coding. We Forge.
• logo
• mascotte
• home page
• about
• legal/imprint
• privacy
• Code of Conduct / well being / moderation
• FAQ #33
• announcement blog post #34

image

image

- [x] [tagline](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/42) Beyond Coding. We Forge. - [x] [logo](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/src/branch/readme/logo) - [x] mascotte - [x] [home page](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/src/branch/main/src/pages/index.astro) - [x] [about](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/src/branch/main/src/pages/about.md) - [x] [legal/imprint](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/src/branch/main/src/pages/imprint.md) - [x] [privacy](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/src/branch/main/src/pages/privacy-policy.md) - [x] [Code of Conduct / well being / moderation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/src/branch/main/src/pages/well-being.md) - [x] FAQ https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/33 - [x] announcement blog post https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/34  

realaravinth commented 2022年11月06日 11:50:48 +01:00

The website should mention how the project differs from Gitea. I like the HedgeDoc timeline which describes how it came into existence.

The website should mention how the project differs from Gitea. I like the [HedgeDoc timeline](https://hedgedoc.org/history/) which describes how it came into existence.

Ryuno-Ki commented 2022年11月06日 12:24:09 +01:00

@circlebuilder suggested to aim at launching on 14th November 2022.

@circlebuilder suggested to aim at launching on 14th November 2022.

Ryuno-Ki commented 2022年11月06日 12:27:23 +01:00

@dachary You suggested, that

As someone who heard of the fork and consider using [...] it because it gives them a Free Software guarantee that Gitea no longer provides, I would like to see single page that shows (i) what it is, (ii) where to get releases.
As a potential contributor (that's a tiny minority of the audience) I would also need a link „Contribute" that redirects to the repository.

@dachary You suggested, that > As someone who heard of the fork and consider using [...] it because it gives them a Free Software guarantee that Gitea no longer provides, I would like to see single page that shows (i) what it is, (ii) where to get releases. > As a potential contributor (that's a tiny minority of the audience) I would also need a link „Contribute" that redirects to the repository.

Ryuno-Ki commented 2022年11月06日 12:28:00 +01:00

@fnetX suggested to take a look at https://codeberg.org/about for inspiration

@fnetX suggested to take a look at https://codeberg.org/about for inspiration

oliverpool commented 2022年11月06日 17:24:58 +01:00

• code of conduct
• matrix rooms

- code of conduct - matrix rooms

oliverpool commented 2022年11月06日 17:27:09 +01:00

I guess a small biography of the maintainers/contributors could be nice. To show the experience with codename as well as current responsabilities/focus.

I guess a small biography of the maintainers/contributors could be nice. To show the experience with codename as well as current responsabilities/focus.

oliverpool commented 2022年11月06日 17:29:00 +01:00

Another content possibility would be a blog, but it need motivated people to regularly write posts...

Another content possibility would be a blog, but it need motivated people to regularly write posts...

Ghost commented 2022年11月06日 17:29:37 +01:00

I guess a small biography of the maintainers/contributors could be nice. To show the experience with codename as well as current responsabilities/focus.

Something like the Garuda Linux about page (this one was the first that came to my mind).

> I guess a small biography of the maintainers/contributors could be nice. To show the experience with codename as well as current responsabilities/focus. > Something like the [Garuda Linux about page](https://garudalinux.org/about.html) (this one was the first that came to my mind).

Ghost commented 2022年11月06日 17:48:49 +01:00

The website should mention how the project differs from Gitea. I like the HedgeDoc timeline which describes how it came into existence.

Something like:
Gogs -> Gitea -> codename

> The website should mention how the project differs from Gitea. I like the [HedgeDoc timeline](https://hedgedoc.org/history/) which describes how it came into existence. Something like: Gogs -> Gitea -> codename

Ghost commented 2022年11月06日 22:57:41 +01:00

Another content possibility would be a blog, but it need motivated people to regularly write posts...

This is rare, very. It would be great that someone with that talent is inspired by "codename".

> Another content possibility would be a blog, but it need motivated people to regularly write posts... This is rare, very. It would be great that someone with that talent is inspired by "codename".

Gusted commented 2022年11月07日 17:10:37 +01:00

I would also like to see an FAQ, this was something discussed by @dachary and me in the forgefriends online coworking session, we might want to have a FAQ whereby one of the questions would be: "Why is this forked backed/supported/hosted by Codeberg" (needs different phrasing).

I would also like to see an FAQ, this was something discussed by @dachary and me in [the forgefriends online coworking session](https://forum.forgefriends.org/t/forgefriends-online-coworking-november-7th-2pm-utc-1/941), we might want to have a FAQ whereby one of the questions would be: "Why is this forked backed/supported/hosted by Codeberg" (needs different phrasing).

Ryuno-Ki commented 2022年11月07日 21:24:26 +01:00

• release pages (with Changelog?) or at least links to the Release Page (in case Codeberg has that. Never seen it but never looked for it either). I would expect the valid GPG Key ID there.

+ release pages (with Changelog?) or at least links to the Release Page (in case Codeberg has that. Never seen it but never looked for it either). I would expect the valid GPG Key ID there.

Ghost commented 2022年11月08日 11:04:58 +01:00

I added a pad for collaborative editing and propose we discuss the bare minimal content the website must have at the date of the launch which is likely early december.

I factored in the pad the content of this discussion except for:

• the bio of maintainers because I think the "who" could simply be Codeberg as a community because it already has a good enough reputation
• the blog because I don't know that anyone is willing to commit to that (and the release notes could be a kind of techno blog at the beginning?)

I added [a pad for collaborative editing](https://pad.gusted.xyz/6e40KhdMSwOZxDAZihzInA#) and propose we discuss the bare minimal content the website must have [at the date of the launch](https://codeberg.org/codename/meta/issues/9) which is likely early december. I factored in the pad the content of this discussion except for: * the bio of maintainers because I think the "who" could simply be Codeberg as a community because it already has a good enough reputation * the blog because I don't know that anyone is willing to commit to that (and the release notes could be a kind of techno blog at the beginning?)

Ryuno-Ki commented 2022年11月08日 15:56:43 +01:00

• the blog because I don't know that anyone is willing to commit to that (and the release notes could be a kind of techno blog at the beginning?)

If we blog release notes they should be structured in a way, that it is possible to have a RSS / Atom feed just for them alone. Be it via category or tax or any other taxonomy.

> * the blog because I don't know that anyone is willing to commit to that (and the release notes could be a kind of techno blog at the beginning?) If we blog release notes they should be structured in a way, that it is possible to have a RSS / Atom feed just for them alone. Be it via category or tax or any other taxonomy.

Ghost commented 2022年11月08日 17:15:02 +01:00

Do you have an example of what you mean? I think I'm only getting that idea vaguely.

Do you have an example of what you mean? I think I'm only getting that idea vaguely.

Ryuno-Ki commented 2022年11月08日 21:58:40 +01:00

For example, Wordpress allows you to have a main feed:

http://boffosocko.com/feed/

as well as per category:

https://boffosocko.com/category/mathematics/feed/

(Taking a fellow IndieWeb person as example).

Since not everyone is interested in everything, releases would allow to notify those that are particular interested in this information.

For example, Wordpress allows you to have a main feed: http://boffosocko.com/feed/ as well as per category: https://boffosocko.com/category/mathematics/feed/ (Taking a fellow IndieWeb person as example). Since not everyone is interested in everything, releases would allow to notify those that are particular interested in this information.

Ghost commented 2022年11月14日 22:27:52 +01:00

Added https://codename.codeberg.page/privacy-policy/ at codename/website@2c82fdf183

Added https://codename.codeberg.page/privacy-policy/ at https://codeberg.org/codename/website/commit/2c82fdf183d610653575ae11d9e14fd523960dd4

Ghost commented 2022年11月14日 22:54:52 +01:00

Chatroom discussion about the target audience at launch time to define what the homepage should contain.

And the corresponding pull request codename/website#15

Chatroom [discussion](https://pad.gusted.xyz/haW-va-8Tf60xBIkvfy_Vw#Audience-targeted) about the target audience at launch time to define what the homepage should contain. And the corresponding pull request https://codeberg.org/codename/website/pulls/15

Ghost commented 2022年12月01日 10:33:30 +01:00

I summarized what is done for the content of the website and what's left to do:

• FAQ
• announcement blog post
• Call for help with interview / survey to build the roadmap

I [summarized what is done for the content of the website](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/issues/2#issue-198944) and what's left to do: - [x] FAQ - [ ] [announcement blog post](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/8) - [ ] Call for help with interview / survey to [build the roadmap](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/20)

Ghost commented 2022年12月04日 15:36:30 +01:00

Items for the FAQ have been proposed

Items [for the FAQ have been proposed](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/33)

Ghost commented 2022年12月04日 23:52:51 +01:00

The announcement blog post is discussed in this PR #34

A survey was drafted and is experimented with

The announcement blog post is discussed in this PR https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/34 A survey was drafted [and is experimented with](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/20#issuecomment-704220)

Ghost commented 2022年12月06日 10:45:22 +01:00

Closing this as the essential content for the website are present. The focus of this issue was to act as a checklist so nothing is missing.

Closing this as the essential content for the website are present. The focus of this issue was to act as a checklist so nothing is missing.