Applications
- (add yourself)
Rationale
The moderation team was created at the very begining of the Forgejo project and has not been approved by the Forgejo community. This needs to change given how important it became. Now that there exists an embryo of decision making, I propose it is done as follows.
- A discussion happens in this issue regarding how the moderation team is to be appointed
- Forgejo community members apply to be part of the future moderation team (following the examples set by the existing applications in other teams (see 1 and 2) or whatever they think more appropriate).
- The larger Forgejo community is actively asked for feedback when there is at least two applicants (the assignee of this issue are accountable to make that happen)
- When at least two members meet the approval of the community, the existing moderation team is disolved and hand over their duties to the newly formed team.
When created, the moderation team is expected to define its own procedures, base on the existing seminal work or however they see fit.
Does that sound like a sensible way to create a legitimate moderation team?
### Applications
* (add yourself)
### Rationale
The moderation team was created at the very begining of the Forgejo project and has not been approved by the Forgejo community. This needs to change given how important it became. Now that there exists an [embryo of decision making](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/src/branch/readme/DECISION-MAKING.md), I propose it is done as follows.
* A **discussion** happens in this issue regarding how the moderation team is to be appointed
* Forgejo community members **apply** to be part of the future moderation team (following the examples set by the existing applications in other teams (see [1](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/142) and [2](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/141)) or whatever they think more appropriate).
* The larger Forgejo community is **actively asked for feedback** when there is at least two applicants (the assignee of this issue are accountable to make that happen)
* When at least two members meet the approval of the community, the existing moderation team is disolved and hand over their duties to the newly formed team.
When created, the moderation team is expected to define its own procedures, base on the [existing seminal work](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/138) or however they see fit.
Does that sound like a sensible way to create a legitimate moderation team?