Archived
15
23
Fork
You've already forked meta
6

Create Wikipedia page for Codeberg with Forgejo #127

Open
opened 2023年01月25日 15:34:41 +01:00 by circlebuilder · 9 comments
Contributor
Copy link

The Gitea wikipedia page mentions Forgejo but there are no pages yet.

The Gitea page is very minimal. If someone likes to pick up some wiki editing a great Forgejo page might be created, and linked from various other locations.

The Gitea wikipedia page [mentions Forgejo](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitea#2022) but there are no pages yet. The Gitea page is very minimal. If someone likes to pick up some wiki editing a great Forgejo page might be created, and linked from various other locations.

For the record, Forgejo would need to match the Wikipedia notability criteria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability to be accepted. It would have a negative impact on Forgejo to create a page at this point in time because it does not. It needs to wait at least another two years.

For the record, Forgejo would need to match the Wikipedia notability criteria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability to be accepted. It would have a negative impact on Forgejo to create a page at this point in time because it does not. It needs to **wait at least another two years**.
Ghost added the due date 2025年02月12日 2023年01月25日 18:06:52 +01:00

'german' wikipedia says this :)

For software, a certain current or historical perception or distribution must be verifiable. An article about software should therefore contain media attention, for example in the form of literature, detailed test reports/reviews, serious comparisons or lists of the best, treatment at specialist conferences or a noteworthy mention in the press. For article requirements, see: Articles about software.

'german' wikipedia says this :) > For software, a certain current or historical perception or distribution must be verifiable. An article about software should therefore contain media attention, for example in the form of literature, detailed test reports/reviews, serious comparisons or lists of the best, treatment at specialist conferences or a noteworthy mention in the press. For article requirements, see: Articles about software.
Author
Contributor
Copy link

In chat there was mention about Codeberg not having its own page. They likely fit notability criteria.

So creating a Codeberg page, describing its services in sub-sections, and then giving it a big sub-section on recently launched Forgejo under their fostering umbrella is an alternative option.

Having that sub-section would also enable cross-linking from other wikipedia pages, probably?

In chat there was mention about Codeberg not having its own page. They likely fit notability criteria. So creating a Codeberg page, describing its services in sub-sections, and then giving it a big sub-section on recently launched Forgejo under their fostering umbrella is an alternative option. Having that sub-section would also enable cross-linking from other wikipedia pages, probably?
circlebuilder changed title from (削除) Create Wikipedia pages and links for Forgejo (削除ここまで) to Create Wikipedia page for Codeberg with Forgejo 2023年01月26日 07:41:31 +01:00

In chat there was mention about Codeberg not having its own page. They likely fit notability criteria.

FYI, I've been making small steps towards filling in some info and paragraphs on the Codeberg draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Codeberg

> In chat there was mention about Codeberg not having its own page. They likely fit notability criteria. FYI, I've been making small steps towards filling in some info and paragraphs on the Codeberg draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Codeberg

Also, for Forgejo I'd lean towards adding a section in the Gitea article and making a Forgejo -> Gitea redirect.

Also, for Forgejo I'd lean towards adding a section in the Gitea article and making a `Forgejo -> Gitea` redirect.
Author
Contributor
Copy link

Hey great @tranzystorek-io .. did you create a codeberg Community issue for it? May help give more eyes and helping hands on it..

Hey great @tranzystorek-io .. did you create a codeberg Community issue for it? May help give more eyes and helping hands on it..

Just added it there: Codeberg/Community#912

Just added it there: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/912
Author
Contributor
Copy link

Just collecting a couple of external sources featuring Codeberg. Maybe some can be used in reference to establish notability criteria for publishing:

I skipped some (not bad) personal blogs. I think the noteworthiness requirement might get tricky.

Just collecting a couple of external sources featuring Codeberg. Maybe some can be used in reference to establish notability criteria for publishing: - https://www.ubuntubuzz.com/2020/06/an-adventure-in-codebergorg-review-by-a-non-programmer.html - https://rewind.com/blog/github-alternatives-a-review-of-bitbucket-gitlab-and-more/ - https://alternativeto.net/software/codeberg-org/about/ - https://linuxnews.de/2022/11/15/git-hosting-plattform-codeberg-zieht-um/ (german) - https://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/26650/aus-teahub-wird-codeberg.html (german) I skipped some (not bad) personal blogs. I think the noteworthiness requirement might get tricky.
Contributor
Copy link

As one of my follow-ups I was introduced to a journalist at FOSDEM.
I pitched the idea of writing about Forgejo but have to drop him an e-mail with some more information.

As one of my follow-ups I was introduced to a journalist at FOSDEM. I pitched the idea of writing about Forgejo but have to drop him an e-mail with some more information.
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
No Branch/Tag specified
readme
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
[Decision] Building proposal(s)
We're in a decision-making process, buiding one or more proposals to address the shared aim based on the criteria
[Decision] Gathering criteria
We're in a decision-making process, gathering criteria, considerations and needs
[Decision] Integrating concerns
We're in a decision-making process, working with a proposal, trying to integrate concerns and create modifications/support such that the proposal works for everyone
Accessibility
Relates to Accessibility (a11y) of product, project and process.
Agreement proposal
Forgejo agreement proposal, following a discussion
Communication
Relates to all channels, social media, website, blog posts.
Election
Process of appointing a person into a role or team (if choosing people just for a specific one-time task, use the Entrustment label)
Entrustment
Process of choosing/approving specific people to do a critical/high-impact one-time task (if choosing people for an ongoing role/team, use the Election label)
Governance
Relates to processes, procedures and decision-making.
Meeting
An upcoming team meeting
User research - Accessibility
Requires input about accessibility features, likely involves user testing.
User research - Blocked
Do not pick as-is! We are happy if you can help, but please coordinate with ongoing redesign in this area.
User research - Community
Community features, such as discovering other people's work or otherwise feeling welcome on a Forgejo instance.
User research - Config (instance)
Instance-wide configuration, authentication and other admin-only needs.
User research - Errors
How to deal with errors in the application and write helpful error messages.
User research - Filters
How filter and search is being worked with.
User research - Future backlog
The issue might be inspiring for future design work.
User research - Git workflow
AGit, fork-based and new Git workflow, PR creation etc
User research - Labels
Active research about Labels
User research - Moderation
Moderation Featuers for Admins are undergoing active User Research
User research - Needs input
Use this label to let the User Research team know their input is requested.
User research - Notifications/Dashboard
Research on how users should know what to do next.
User research - Rendering
Text rendering, markup languages etc
User research - Repo creation
Active research about the New Repo dialog.
User research - Repo units
The repo sections, disabling them and the "Add more" button.
User research - Security
User research - Settings (in-app)
How to structure in-app settings in the future?
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
5 participants Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

2025年02月13日

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
forgejo/meta#127
Reference in a new issue
forgejo/meta
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?